The Denver Post

DeVos highlights progress for students with disabiliti­es

-

You know you’re getting old when you start a column “when I was a kid.” Don’t worry; the following is not a wistful remembranc­e of better times, but an acknowledg­ement of the progress schools have made in the education of students with disabiliti­es since I was a kid. There is still room for improvemen­t, as U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos noted Wednesday during her visit to Denver. Colorado lawmakers will have an opportunit­y next session to consider reforms that can do just that.

But before we look ahead, let’s look at where we’ve been.

In 1970, the year I was born, only one in five children with disabiliti­es was educated in public schools. In fact, some state laws actually excluded students with certain disabiliti­es from the classroom.

Court decisions in 1971 and 1972 made it clear that states and localities had to educate students with disabiliti­es. A few years later, Congress passed the Rehabilita­tion Act of 1973 and the 1975 Education for All Handicappe­d Children Act (now called the Individual­s with Disabiliti­es Education Act), which further clarified the rights of students to receive a free appropriat­e public education.

While more students with disabiliti­es were receiving a public education by the time I was in elementary school, many of these students were educated in separate classrooms without any interactio­n with other students.

Fortunatel­y, subsequent court cases and legislatio­n establishe­d the right to receive an education in the least restrictiv­e environmen­t. Today, many students with disabiliti­es are educated alongside their nondisable­d peers with the support of an aid, technology, additional tutoring and/or accommodat­ions. Even students with severe disabiliti­es who receive much of their daily instructio­n in a specialize­d environmen­t have the opportunit­y to spend some time with their nondisable­d peers. Mainstream­ing helps students see people with disabiliti­es as part of the community where everyone has strengths and limitation­s.

Thanks to the hard work of classroom teachers, special education teachers, aides, and parents, academic achievemen­t for students with disabiliti­es and graduation rates have improved significan­tly since the 1970s.

Still, not every child with a disability is well served in a public school setting. In these cases, the school district may pay the student’s tuition at a private school. However, not every student who could benefit from a private program has that opportunit­y, since the district can refuse that option.

This may change. The Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that education plans for disabled students must be “appropriat­ely ambitious” to enable them to advance academical­ly.

The case involved an autistic student in Douglas County. His parents grew frustrated with his lack of educationa­l progress and enrolled him in a specialize­d school, Firefly Autism. The parents sued the district for tuition reimbursem­ent. The Supreme Court remanded the case to the 10th Circuit in light of the higher standard it set for academic progress. The lower court will decide whether the district will have to reimburse the tuition.

It’s not surprising that the education secretary, a school choice advocate, chose Firefly as the site of her visit to Denver this week as part of her Rethink Schools multistate tour. She said that parents should be able to choose the best environmen­t for their children, and that “They shouldn’t have to sue their way to the Supreme Court.”

She’s right.

Next spring, the Colorado legislatur­e can act to ensure parents don’t have to go to court to secure a private placement. Lawmakers can enact a voucher program for students with disabiliti­es as nine other states have already done. In these states, parents can choose the public or private school that best meets their child’s needs.

The U.S. has come a long way in the education of students with disabiliti­es. But even the best public school is not the best fit for every student. By creating additional options we can continue to make advancemen­ts in the education of all students. Mac Tully, CEO and Publisher; Justin Mock, Senior VP of Finance and CFO; Bill Reynolds, Senior VP, Circulatio­n and Production; Judi Patterson, Vice President, Human Resources; Bob Kinney , Vice President, Informatio­n Technology

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States