The Denver Post

Trump likely to “decertify” Iran deal

- By Anne Gearan

President Donald Trump is expected to announce next week that he will “decertify” the internatio­nal nuclear deal with Iran, saying it is not in the national interest of the United States and kicking the issue to a reluctant Congress, people briefed on the White House strategy said Thursday.

The move would mark the first step in a process that could eventually result in the resumption of U.S. sanctions against Iran, potentiall­y derailing a deal limiting Iran’s nuclear activities reached in 2015 with the United States and five other nations.

But Trump would hold off on recommendi­ng that Congress reimpose sanctions, which would constitute a clearer break from the pact, according to four people familiar with aspects of the president’s thinking.

The decision would amount to a middle ground of sorts between Trump, who has long wanted to withdraw from the agreement completely, and many congressio­nal leaders and senior diplomatic, military and national security advisers, who believe the deal is worth preserving with changes if possible.

This week, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford expressed qualified support for the deal during congressio­nal testimony. And Mattis suggested he did not believe taking the step to decertify would scuttle the agreement.

Trump is expected to deliver a speech, tentativel­y scheduled for

Oct. 12, laying out a larger strategy for confrontin­g the nation he blames for terrorism and instabilit­y throughout the Middle East.

Officials cautioned that plans could still change, and the White House would not confirm plans for a speech or its contents. Trump faces an Oct. 15 deadline to report to Congress on whether Iran is complying with the agreement and whether he judges the deal to be in the U.S. national security interest.

“The administra­tion looks forward to sharing details of our Iran strategy at the appropriat­e time,” said Michael Anton, spokesman for the White House National Security Council.

The fate of the nuclear pact is only one considerat­ion in that larger strategy, U.S. officials said, although given Trump’s focus on it as an “embarrassm­ent,” it is the most high-profile element.

The deal signed under President Barack Obama was intended to close off the potential for Iran to quickly build a nuclear bomb by curbing nuclear activities the United States and other partners considered most troubling. It allowed some uranium enrichment to continue for what Iran claims is peaceful medical research and energy; the country says it has never sought nuclear weapons. In exchange, world powers lifted crippling U.S. and internatio­nal economic sanctions.

At issue now is the fate of U.S. sanctions lifted by Obama and by extension whether the United States will move to break the deal. That could open an internatio­nal breach with European partners who have warned they will not follow suit.

Outreach for a “trans-Atlantic understand­ing” about reopening or supplement­ing the deal is likely to be part of Trump’s announceme­nt, according to one Iran analyst who has discussed the strategy with administra­tion officials.

Trump said last month that he had decided what to do on Iran but that he would not divulge the decision.

The president’s senior national security advisers agreed within the past several weeks to recommend that Trump “decertify” the agreement at the Oct. 15 deadline, two of those people said.

The administra­tion has begun discussing possible legislatio­n to “strengthen” the agreement, congressio­nal aides and others said - a “fix it or nix it” approach suggested by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), a leading Republican hawk on Iran.

But the prospects of such an approach are highly uncertain, and many supporters of the deal consider it a dodge.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said last month that he will not reopen the agreement for negotiatio­n. Separately, representa­tives of Iran, China and Russia told Secretary of State Rex Tillerson the same thing during a meeting on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly session last month, two senior diplomats familiar with that meeting said.

Cotton appeared to preview the main elements of the administra­tion’s plan this week, although he said he does not know exactly what Trump plans to do. The two met Thursday at the White House.

In a speech Tuesday at the Council on Foreign Relations, Cotton said Trump should “decline to certify the deal and begin the work of strengthen­ing it.”

He said decertific­ation should be based on a finding that the deal is not in the U.S. “vital national security interest,” citing “the long catalogue of the regime’s crimes and perfidy against the United States, as well as the deal’s inherent weakness.”

But Cotton said he would not push for the immediate reimpositi­on of sanctions, as some conservati­ve lawmakers and outside lobbying groups are pushing to do.

He laid out proposals for Congress to pass new stipulatio­ns for U.S. participat­ion in the deal, including eliminatio­n of the “sunset clauses” under which restrictio­ns on some Iranian nuclear activities expire after several years, tougher inspection­s requiremen­ts and new curbs on Iran’s ballistica­nd cruise-missile programs.

Cotton claimed that a unified statement from Congress would help Trump forge a new agreement among European and other allies and strengthen his hand for renegotiat­ion.

“The world needs to know we’re serious, we’re willing to walk away, and we’re willing to reimpose sanctions - and a lot more than that,” Cotton said. “And they’ll know that when the president declines to certify the deal, and not before.”

In the Senate, plans have been underway for months to respond to a presidenti­al decertific­ation.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) has been Capitol Hill’s point person on discussion­s with the White House.

Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin (D-Md.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) also have been made aware of plans being discussed with the White House and State Department.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States