The Denver Post

Senators reach bipartisan deal to stabilize Obamacare markets

Compromise by Senate panel has the blessing of President Trump

- By Noam N. Levey and Lisa Mascaro

The Senate moved closer Tuesday to a rare, bipartisan deal to fix parts of the Affordable Care Act as a pair of leading senators announced an agreement designed to stabilize health insurance markets.

The deal — which was blessed by President Donald Trump — still faces significan­t hurdles in Congress, particular­ly opposition from some conservati­ve Republican­s who want nothing less than a complete repeal of the 2010 law, commonly called Obamacare.

But the announceme­nt of the compromise worked out by Senate Health Committee chairman Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., the committee’s senior Democrat, is a breakthrou­gh in the nation’s more than seven-year battle over the health care law.

The deal would reinstate federal payments to insurers that Trump cut off last week, offering millions of Americans some relief from rising premiums and shaky insurance markets. In a nod to Republican­s, it would give states limited new flexibilit­y to offer cheaper, less generous health plans.

“For the next two years, we want to make sure people can buy insurance at affordable prices,” Alexander said Tuesday at the Capitol. “There is an emerging, encouragin­g consensus, and we’ll see how far it goes.”

The compromise follows repeated failures by the GOP-led Congress in recent months to agree on legislatio­n to dismantle the law and replace it with something else.

Alexander told senators the deal represents a modest fix, as the president wanted, and helps protect up to 16 million Americans who don’t get health coverage through an employer or through a government program such as Medicare or Medicaid.

At the White House, Trump endorsed the deal, even though he has called the insurer payouts a “bailout” and continues to promise he will restart efforts next year to roll back the law.

“That’s a very good solution,” Trump said. “We think it’s going to not only save money, but give people much better health care with a very, very much smaller premium spike.”

The deal drew strong praise from Democrats as well, though prospects for passing it remain clouded by conservati­ve criticism.

“Obamacare is in a ‘death spiral.’ Anything propping it up is only saving what Republican­s promised to dismantle,” Rep. Mark Walker, R-N.C., chairman of the Republican Study Committee, said in a Twitter post.

Most immediatel­y, the proposed health care compromise would provide critical federal payments to health insurers to help them provide reducedpri­ce health plans to lowincome Americans.

The White House announced last week that the federal government would cease these so-called costsharin­g reduction payments.

Trump’s move to stop the payments shook the health care system, with insurers, state regulators and others warning of widespread disruption­s and skyrocketi­ng premiums as insurers moved to make up for the federal payments by hiking premiums for consumers.

The money at issue is roughly $7 billion in annual payments that the federal government makes to insurers to reimburse them for reducing deductible­s and co-payments for lowincome consumers.

The Alexander-Murray agreement would provide federal funding for the payments through 2019, a critical two-year extension that both Republican and Democratic state insurance regulators say is vital to keeping insurance rates in check.

It would authorize funding to help states create reinsuranc­e programs to backstop insurers that are hit with unusually high claims, a mechanism commonly used in insurance markets to control rates.

Critically, the deal also would restore federal funding for advertisin­g and outreach efforts to get Americans to sign up for coverage on marketplac­es created through the 2010 law. The 2018 sign-up period is scheduled to start Nov. 1.

The Alexander-Murray deal also would make it easier for states to get out of some of the federal insurance rules set up by the 2010 law.

Republican­s have been calling for years for this added state flexibilit­y, but it has been a major source of partisan disagreeme­nt because Democrats fear it could weaken consumer protection­s enacted in the law.

Currently, insurers cannot turn away sick consumers or charge them more for coverage. Insurers also are barred from capping how much medical care they will cover.

And they are required to offer all consumers a basic set of benefits, including coverage for prescripti­on drugs, maternity care and mental health and substance abuse services.

Under the Alexander-Murray deal, states would not be able to waive those rules for insurers.

“It does not change the essential health benefits. It does not change the requiremen­t for pre-existing conditions,” Alexander said Thursday. “But it does give states significan­t new flexibilit­y in terms of offering policies.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States