The Denver Post

Trump moved to fire special counsel in June

Plan to remove Mueller brought White House counsel to brink of leaving

- By Rosalind S. Helderman and Josh Dawsey

WASHINGTON» President Donald Trump sought the firing of Robert Mueller III last June, shortly after the special counsel took over the investigat­ion into Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election, and he backed off only after White House Counsel Donald McGahn threatened to resign over the move.

The extraordin­ary showdown was confirmed by two people familiar with the episode, which was first reported by The New York Times.

McGahn did not deliver his resignatio­n threat directly to Trump but was serious about his threat to leave, according to a person familiar with the episode.

The president’s effort came in the weeks after Mueller’s appointmen­t in May to lead the probe into Trump’s campaign and whether it coordinate­d with Russian attempts to tilt the election.

Mueller was tapped for the role by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein after Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, and his probe has quickly expanded to include an exploratio­n of whether Trump has attempted to obstruct the ongoing investigat­ion.

The incident could become part of Mueller’s examinatio­n of whether Trump has taken steps to try to stymie the investigat­ion.

Peter Carr, a spokesman for the special counsel’s office, declined to comment. McGahn did not immediatel­y respond to requests for comment.

A White House spokesman referred questions to Ty Cobb, the attorney coordinati­ng the administra­tion’s response to the Russia investigat­ions, who did not immediatel­y respond to requests for comment. John Dowd, an attorney for the president, declined to comment.

Sen. Mark Warner, Va., the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee, which is conducting its own investigat­ion of Russian interferen­ce, said in a statement that “firing the Special Counsel is a red line that the President cannot cross. Any attempt to remove the Special Counsel, pardon key witnesses, or otherwise interfere in the investigat­ion, would be a gross abuse of power, and all members of Congress, from both parties, have a responsibi­lity to our Constituti­on and to our country to make that clear immediatel­y.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States