The Denver Post

About that “breach of trust”

-

This is excerpted from an editorial by The Washington Post.

Before rushing to judgment on the latest surge of disclosure­s about Facebook data and how it was used by Cambridge Analytica, everyone should take a deep breath. The very essence of Facebook and social media is to share informatio­n, to entertain and enlighten users, and to sustain a business model that has transforme­d marketing, advertisin­g and news. Those who enter the ecosystem of social networking should not suddenly be shocked that informatio­n is being shared. What they should want is transparen­cy and a robust digital world that does not become a hidden surveillan­ce state.

A key question is: Who owns personal informatio­n? Facebook allowed an outside researcher in 2013 to develop an app on the platform that paid users a small sum to answer questions and download the app, which then harvested private informatio­n from their profiles and their friends. Facebook permitted such data mining at the time. It is doubtful many users knew what was happening or read the fine print. The researcher, Aleksandr Kogan of Cambridge University, then provided the data — on some 50 million people — to Cambridge Analytica, a private firm founded by Steve Bannon, the conservati­ve political operative; and Robert Mercer, the wealthy financier; and another firm.

This transfer of data to a third party broke Facebook’s internal policies. In 2015, Facebook found out, removed the app and demanded the data be destroyed. Apparently, it was not, and may have been exploited to help Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign. The transfer may also have violated Facebook assurances about user privacy to the Federal Trade Commission in a 2011 settlement.

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg responded Wednesday with an admission of “a breach of trust” and a promise of tighter controls. Further examinatio­n of how this happened should come from Facebook, Congress and the FTC.

However, users must be realistic. Social media platforms are in business to share. Anyone who spends time browsing online will soon discover hidden sinews that connect each click. Consumers benefit when they get recommenda­tions for a product “we thought you might like.” But at the same time, no one wants a nightmaris­h surveillan­ce state like that under constructi­on in China, where every citizen is being assigned a “social credit” score.

The trick is to find the right path.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States