The Denver Post

Hackers used U.S. online infrastruc­ture against itself

Indictment released Friday reconstruc­ts use of web servers, bitcoin financing

- By Tami Abdollah

WASHINGTON» Exactly seven months before the 2016 presidenti­al election, Russian government hackers made it onto a Democratic committee’s network.

One of their carefully crafted fraudulent emails had hit pay dirt, enticing an employee to click a link and enter her password.

That breach of the Democratic Congressio­nal Campaign Committee was the first significan­t step in gaining access to the Democratic National Committee network.

To steal politicall­y-sensitive informatio­n, prosecutor­s say, the hackers exploited some of the United States’ own computer infrastruc­ture against it, using servers they leased in Arizona and Illinois. The details were included in an indictment released Friday by special counsel Robert Mueller, who accused the GRU, Russia’s military intelligen­ce agency, of taking part in a wide-ranging conspiracy to interfere in the 2016 presidenti­al election. The companies operating the servers were not identified in the court papers.

The Russians are accused of exploiting their access to inexpensiv­e, powerful servers worldwide — convenient­ly available for rental — that can be used to commit crimes with impunity. Reaching across oceans and into networks without borders can obfuscate their origins.

The indictment painstakin­gly reconstruc­ts the hackers’ movements using web servers and a complex bitcoin financing operation.

Two Russian hacking units were charged with tasks, including the creation and management of a hacking tool called “Xagent” that was implanted onto computers. The software allowed them to monitor activity on computers by individual­s, steal passwords and maintain access to hacked networks. It captured each keystroke on infected computers and took screenshot­s of activity displayed on computer screens, including an employee viewing the DCCC’s online banking informatio­n.

From April to June 2016, the hackers installed updated versions of their software on at least 10 Democratic computers. The software transmitte­d informatio­n from the infected computers to a GRU-leased server in Arizona, the indictment said. The hackers also created an overseas computer to act as a “middle server” to obscure the connection between the DCCC and the hackers’ Arizonabas­ed server.

Once hackers gained access to the DCCC network, it searched one computer for terms that included “hillary,” ‘‘cruz,” and “trump” and copied select folders, including “Benghazi Investigat­ions.”

In emails, the hackers embedded a link that purported to be a spreadshee­t of Clinton’s favorabili­ty ratings, but instead it directed the computers to send its data to a GRU-created website.

Meanwhile, around the same time, the hackers broke into 33 DNC computers and installed their software on their network. Captured keystrokes and screenshot­s from the DCCC and DNC computers, including an employee viewing the DCCC’s banking informatio­n, were sent back to the Arizona server.

The Russian hackers used other software they developed called X-Tunnel to move stolen documents through encrypted channels to another computer the GRU leased in Illinois.

Despite the use of U.S.-based servers, such vendors typically aren’t legally liable for criminal activities unless it can be proved in federal court that the operator was party to the criminal activity.

A 1996 federal statute protects internet vendors from being held liable for how customers use their service, and except for a few exceptions, provides immunity to the providers. The law is considered a key part of the legal infrastruc­ture of the internet, preventing providers from being saddled with the behemoth task of monitoring activity on their servers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States