Corporate America triumphs as formula protected at WHO

There’s Big Steel. There’s Big Pharma. There’s Big Tech and Big Coal and Big Banks and Big Oil. Now comes the latest major lobbying organization to throw its weight around and demonstrate the astounding hold that corporate conservatives have on all three branches of the U.S. government.

Say hello to Big Baby.

The New York Times reported that during this year’s World Health Assembly in May, the U.S. delegation tried to undermine a resolution encouraging women around the world to breastfeed. The assembly is the annual meeting of delegates from 194 nations to the United Nations-affiliated World Health Organization.

For decades, health experts have agreed that mother’s milk is better for infants than baby formulas. The resolution urged member countries to regulate the misleading marketing claims of formula manufacturers. The resolution was in no way controversial until the U.S. delegation, representing the interests of Big Baby, started stirring up trouble.

Ecuador, which was scheduled to introduce the resolution, was threatened with trade retaliation and the possible withdrawal of U.S. military aid. Other nations, fearing similar threats, backed down. Eventually the Russians, of all people, agreed to introduce the resolution, and it passed mostly unchanged.

“We’re not trying to be a hero here,” a Russian delegate told the Times, “but we feel that it is wrong when a big country tries to push around some very small countries, especially on an issue that is really important for the rest of the world.”

This is the sort of thing that U.S. officials used to be able to say. Today they do the bidding of corporate interests. More than threefourths of the U.S. baby food market is controlled by just three companies: Nestle USA (Gerber), Abbott Inc. (Similac) and Mead Johnson (Enfamil). All three are part of Big Baby’s $47 billion-ayear global market, which is expected to grow 50 percent in the next three years no matter what the World Health Assembly says.

With Donald Trump in the White House, Republicans in control of Congress and a corporate majority on the Supreme Court, business has done spectacularly. But trying to persuade mothers in the Third World to mix up baby formula — despite having no reliable supply of clean water to mix it with — is truly perverse.

It’s the apotheosis for a movement that lay dormant during the years of the New Deal and the Great Society but began to emerge in the 1970s. Movement conservatives appropriated the word “freedom” as a substitute for untrammeled greed. It was truly brilliant how they did it.

They decided that the Gilded Age had it right, and that a nation’s greatness should not be measured, as Gandhi said, by how it treats its weakest members, but by how much wealth its strongest members could amass.

The stock market boomed. Executive compensation exploded. Blue-collar wages flatlined. A man named Leonard Leo built an obscure organization of conservative lawyers called the Federalist Society into a powerful force for the protection of corporate interests and wedge social issues. He is chiefly responsible for picking the conservative majority on the Supreme Court — including Brett Kavanaugh, the man Trump nominated as Justice Anthony Kennedy’s replacement.

“Leonard Leo was a visionary,” Tom Carter, who worked as a public relations man for Leo, told The Daily Beast. “He figured out 20 years ago that conservatives had lost the culture war. Abortion, gay rights, contraception — conservatives didn’t have a chance if public opinion prevailed. So they needed to stack the courts.”

Yes! Public opinion be damned. Just load up the courts with Federalist Society members and wait for the fun to begin. Steal a Supreme Court nomination. Ignore Trump’s abuses as long as he supports the plutocratic agenda.

It’s like taking candy from a baby. Or worse, mother’s milk.