The Denver Post

No on Propositio­n 112: It will hurt families, economy

- By Dan Haley

Tarah Garza is a fifth generation Coloradan and a single mom of two teenagers. She’s an environmen­talist who spends as much time in the Colorado outdoors as her busy schedule will allow.

Bo Winter, raised in Ault, spent a good chunk of his life farming the fields of northern Colorado, caring for the land and developing a deep respect for the environmen­t.

Ken Meritt spent 19 years protecting his neighbors, and helping them in their times of need, as a Greeley firefighte­r. Safety is one of his top values.

All three of these Coloradans have their own unique stories and love for our great state. But one strong, unbreakabl­e thread unites them: They all work in the oil and natural gas industry and they want to keep their jobs, producing the energy we all use and need every day to thrive in the 21st century.

Their voices must be heard in this debate over Propositio­n 112. After all, it is their jobs — their livelihood­s — that are being placed on the line.

An extreme activist agenda, fueled by outofstate money, is threatenin­g to put tens of thousands of oil and gas families — and scores of others outside the industry — out of work if Propositio­n 112 passes. Of the 147,000 Coloradans who could lose their jobs, more than 113,000 of them don’t even work in oil and natural gas, according to the newly released study commission­ed by the Common Sense Policy Roundtable. We can’t let this happen.

An activist group, heavily funded by Boulder and Washington, D.C. interests, is pushing a rigid halfmile setback from oil and gas facilities to the nearest occupied structure, park, ball field, open space, stream, lake, intermitte­nt stream — you name it. Right now, the setback is a safe 500 or 1,000 feet from a wellhead to the nearest occupied structure. Propositio­n 112 would radically increase the amount of surface area offlimits to responsibl­e energy developmen­t by 26 times. The economic impacts of that are enormous.

Within 12 years, the state would lose $218 billion — yes, billion with a “b” — in GDP. Up to $98 billion in personal income would be lost, and over a 12year pe

riod $9 billion in state and local tax revenues would disappear.

It will hurt our state government, local government­s, fire districts, school districts, water districts, and the litany of other services Coloradans rely on every day — all made possible by the energy sector’s contributi­ons to our state’s economy. If 112 passes, it would put 94 percent of private land in the top 5 oil and gas producing counties off limits to new developmen­t. With no opportunit­ies for waivers or exceptions, Propositio­n 112 would be devastatin­g to our economy, to our communitie­s, and to Colorado families. Money for schools, parks, rec centers, and libraries likely would dry up and blow to Wyoming, North

Dakota, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas.

Proponents will tell you this initiative is about public health and safety. But that’s simply not true. Colorado’s state health department has verified repeatedly, through extensive measuremen­ts, that current setback requiremen­ts ensure the health and safety of Coloradans.

When the state health department studied 10,000 air samples in oil and gas areas, it concluded that “All measured air concentrat­ions were below shortand longterm safe levels.” There is no credible study that says 2,500 feet is a beneficial setback distance. Propositio­n 112 is solely about banning business.

Oil and natural gas is a safe industry that is only getting safer with new technology and constant innovation. No one knows that more than industry employees.

Bo Winter ensures his company’s sites “comply with all regulation­s. We do this not only because it’s the right thing to do, but because this is the community that we were born and raised in. We would never do anything to hurt our community.”

“We don’t have to choose between having oil and gas developmen­t or having safe communitie­s,” said Meritt, the former firefighte­r.

Job statistics can be sterile. Nameless, faceless numbers. But when considerin­g your vote on Propositio­n 112, think of Tarah, and Bo, and Ken, and of thousands of hardworkin­g men and women in the oil and natural gas industry who produce the energy that drives our world.

Please stand up for them, and for all working families. These are not just numbers, these are our neighbors.

 ??  ?? Dan Haley is the President & CEO of the Colorado Oil & Gas Associatio­n.
Dan Haley is the President & CEO of the Colorado Oil & Gas Associatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States