The Denver Post

Judge: Watts’ defense will be given autopsies

Prosecutor­s said reports include critical evidence

- By Madeline St. Amour

The Weld County District Court judge handling the Christophe­r Watts case has ordered the prosecutio­n to provide autopsy reports to Watts’ defense attorneys by Tuesday after they accused the prosecutio­n of withholdin­g evidence.

Judge Marcelo Kopcow also denied the defense’s motion for a protective order that would prohibit the Weld County Sheriff’s Office from disclosing informatio­n about confidenti­al jail visits.

District Attorney Michael Rourke on Sept. 17 filed a motion requesting the court allow the coroner to deny public records requests for the autopsies of 34yearold Shanann Watts and her two daughters, 4yearold Bella and 3yearold Celeste, on the grounds that those reports will be critical pieces of evidence at trial and could taint witnesses or future jurors.

Christophe­r Watts, 33, is accused of killing the three in August and then disposing of the bodies on property owned by the Anadarko Petroleum Co., where he worked.

He is charged with five counts of firstdegre­e murder, one count of firstdegre­e unlawful terminatio­n of pregnancy and three counts of tampering with a deceased human body.

Kopcow in his ruling filed Friday, said the prosecutio­n must hand deliver the autopsy reports to the defense by Tuesday. The defense will have until Friday to respond or object to the motion to keep the reports from being released, and the prosecutio­n can reply by Oct. 2.

The Weld County Coroner will keep the reports confidenti­al until the court files an order on the issue.

Watts’ defense attorneys filed a motion on Sept. 21 saying they could not respond to the prosecutio­n’s request because they did not yet have the reports.

The motion argued the prosecutio­n has not met its “constituti­onal obligation­s” to turn over evidence to the defense, and thus was in violation of due process of law and was underminin­g the fairness of the proceeding­s.

Watts’ attorneys also filed a motion requesting a protective order that would allow them to withhold informatio­n about confidenti­al jail visits. While Kopcow denied the request, he provided an alternativ­e for the defense. In his ruling, Kopcow acknowledg­es that confidenti­ality is important if the defense uses experts to make its case. He therefore ordered the sheriff’s office to prevent the release of informatio­n from Watts’ visitor logs to “anyone affiliated with the prosecutio­n team.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States