NATION WIND TURBINES CAN ADD TO ALL THAT HOT AIR

Harvard study says this renewable energy may actually impact climate as much as fossil fuels.

WA S HING TON» Ramping up wind power in America would also dial up the nation’s temperatures, a new study from Harvard found.

While wind energy is widely celebrated as environmentally friendly, the researchers concluded that a dramatic, allout expansion in the number of turbines could warm the country even more than climate change from burning coal and other fossil fuels, because of the way the spinning blades disturb the layers of warm and cold air in the atmosphere.

Some parts of the central United States are already seeing nights that are up to 2 degrees Fahrenheit warmer because of nearby wind farms, said study lead author Lee Miller, an environmental scientist at Harvard.

“Any big energy system has an environmental impact,” said Harvard engineering and physics professor David Keith, a study coauthor. “There is no free lunch. You do wind on a scale big enough ... it’ll change things.”

The researchers and other scientists stressed that climate change from greenhouse gas emissions is clearly a far bigger threat globally and over the long term than turbinecaused warming, which is temporary and stops when the blades aren’t turning.

Despite the potential drawbacks, wind energy still makes more sense for the environment than fossil fuels, Keith said. It’s just that advocates of wind power have been ignoring growing evidence of a downside, he said.

Overall, the Harvard study, published Thursday in the journal Joule, found that in the unlikely event that the U.S. switched massively to wind to supply nearly all its electricity, there would be so many turbines that on average the nation’s temperature would go up about 0.4 degrees (0.2 Celsius). Some central areas would see localized warming around 2.5 degrees (1.4 Celsius), though there would also be some cooling in places, such as the East Coast.

Wind is providing 6.3 percent of the nation’s electricity, according to the American Wind Energy Association.

Harvard’s study, which looked at just the United States, said the turbines would cause more warming in the short term this century than the carbon dioxide America spews into the atmosphere would. The reason for this effect: Usually, the air is more still at night, with cold air staying near the surface and warmer air resting a little higher. But turbines bring the warm air down and cool air up, making the ground a bit toastier. The effect is seen less during the day but is still there.

Still, the effect from turbines is different from humancaused climate change. It mostly consists of warming, it’s local and it’s temporary. When the turbines are still because the air is calm, there’s no warming.

Climate change, in contrast, is a global effect that involves many more elements than temperature — such as sea level rise, extreme weather, melting glaciers and shifts in the jet stream.

Even if a country stopped emitting greenhouse gases, it would still experience climate change if the rest of the world kept on polluting.

Past studies have observed a temporary nighttime warming of as much as 2 degrees (1.1 Celsius) in places with lots of wind turbines, such as in north Texas. The Harvard study took observations and used computer simulation to project what a dramatic increase in turbines would look like for temperatures.