The Denver Post

Colorado can fix its roads without a sales tax increase

- By John W. Suthers John Suthers is the mayor of Colorado Springs and the former attorney general for Colorado.

New roads without a tax increase, or undetermin­ed projects with a 21 percent sales tax increase. That’s the choice Colorado voters will have this fall between Propositio­n 109 and Propositio­n 110.

The choice couldn’t be simpler. Prop 109, Fix Our Damn Roads, requires the Colorado Department of Transporta­tion to bond $3.5 billion to immediatel­y build 66 of the most needed road and bridge projects around Colorado. The bonds will be paid for by the surplus revenues pouring into the state, not a tax increase.

Unlike the taxincreas­ing Prop 110, these projects are listed in the actual ballot language, so there can be no baitandswi­tch. That is, unlike 110, you know exactly what you are voting on.

A quick history lesson might be helpful. In 1999 then Gov. Bill Owens used this same strategy when we voted “yes” for the Trex projects, which put another lane on Interstate 25 to the Tech Center and 21 other projects around the state without raising taxes. Detractors then said we couldn’t build more roads without a tax increase. Yet we easily did. Now those bonds have been paid off.

But with so many more people coming to Colorado and the traffic getting so bad, and with surplus revenue flooding state coffers, we need to do it again. It’s one of the reasons Bill Owens has joined me in supporting Prop 109.

For the last decade the state legislatur­e has failed to put any real funding into new road projects, even while the state budget has ballooned. The legislatur­e has found money to expand Medicaid to the point where one out of every four Coloradans is on Medicaid, but

they wouldn’t fund roads.

Our Department of Transporta­tion found money to build a new headquarte­rs and build multimilli­ondollar bike paths, but we’re told there’s no money to build roads. There was even money to give movie producers millions of dollars in incentives to make a movie that didn’t even take place in Colorado, but there’s no money to build roads?

Like so many Coloradans trapped in endless traffic, I’m very skeptical. Building and maintainin­g our state roads and bridges is a core function of state government which seems to have been lost in the state bureaucrac­y.

What the special interests promoting the competing taxincreas­e proposal don’t like talking about is the fact that Colorado taxpayers are already going to pay a large tax increase they didn’t vote for. The new federal tax code under the Trump tax cuts lowers the income tax most of us will pay, but only on the federal level. It has the reverse effect on our Colorado state income taxes. Since there are fewer deductions allowed on the federal level, on average our “Federal Taxable Income” goes up. Your Colorado state taxes are figured on that number. As that number goes up, so does your state income tax.

Colorado’s Legislativ­e Council predicts that within a few years we’ll collective­ly be paying almost $900 million more a year in state income taxes. That is a huge windfall for the state. By voting for Fix Our Damn Roads, Prop 109, you are telling the legislatur­e to spend less than a third of the windfall on building new roads. The cost of the bonds is only $260 million a year.

Or to look at it another way, Propositio­n 109 tells the state to reallocate less than 1 percent of its massive budget to roads. We all could find 1 percent of our household budget if we needed to. Do you really believe the state couldn’t do the same?

The promoters of the tax increase want you to raise the state sales tax by 21 percent, hurting working families. It would raise the total sales tax in places like Commerce City to 10 percent. As a mayor myself I oppose this idea because it will raise sales taxes so high that if a city needs a local sales tax increase for anything from essential public infrastruc­ture to more fire or police services, or new parks, it won’t be able to. Local government­s should pay for local infrastruc­ture and state government should pay for state infrastruc­ture.

By no mean is Fix Our Damn Roads a silver bullet for every transporta­tion challenge we have. But it also isn’t a Christmas wish list disguised as a transporta­tion tax increase.

We don’t need to punish working families who are already struggling with high health care costs and soaring housing prices with a large, regressive tax increase while we have so much revenue flooding state coffers. Let’s Fix Our Damn Roads without a tax increase.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States