The Denver Post

How Michael grew into a 155 mph monster

- By Seth Borenstein

WASHINGTON» Moist air, warm waters in the Gulf of Mexico and ideal wind patterns supercharg­ed Hurricane Michael in the hours before it smacked Florida’s Panhandle.

Hurricane Michael was barely a hurricane Tuesday morning, with winds of 90 mph. A little over a day later, it had transforme­d into a monster. When it made landfall Wednesday afternoon, it was blowing at 155 mph. That’s a 72 percent increase in wind speed in less than 33 hours.

“Michael saw our worst fears realized, of rapid intensific­ation just before landfall on a part of a coastline that has never experience­d a Category 4 hurricane,” University of Miami hurricane researcher Brian McNoldy said Wednesday morning.

Hurricanes have something called a potential intensity. That’s how strong a storm can get if all other factors are aligned, said National Oceanic and Atmospheri­c Administra­tion climate and hurricane expert Jim Kossin said. Michael had nothing holding it back.

“Everything was there for it to reach its potential, and it did,” Kossin said.

As Michael’s eye started coming ashore, it boasted the thirdlowes­t central pressure of any storm to hit the United States, behind only a 1935 Labor Day storm and 1969’s Camille.

Meteorolog­ists first got a sense something big could be happening by watching how Michael’s eye changed shape. Early on Tuesday, it was oddly shaped and ragged. Later in the morning, it started to get better organized. By Tuesday night, realtime satellite imagery was showing the eye getting stronger and scarier by the minute.

Another factor: its pressure, the measuremen­t meteorolog­ists use to gauge a hurricane’s strength. The lower the pressure, the stronger the storm. Before landfall, Michael’s pressure fell so low, it looked like the winds were sure to pick up fast, said Ryan Maue, a meteorolog­ist for weathermod­els.com.

And none of the factors that hold a storm back were present, especially something called “wind shear.” Wind shear is when there’s a mismatch either in speed or direction between winds near the surface and those five to six miles up.

That mismatch “pushes the storm over” or decapitate­s it, Kossin said. When the wind shear near Michael eased, the storm took off, he said.

“It’s kind of like someone was holding on to it when it was trying to run, and they let it go,” Kossin said.

Another huge factor was the water temperatur­e. Warm water is the energy that fuels hurricanes, and the gulf water is 4 to 5 degrees warmer than normal.

Water temperatur­es in the Gulf of Mexico vary along with weather, but some scientists said the warm waters are signs of humancause­d climate change.

“Have humans contribute­d to how dangerous Michael is?” Kossin said. “Now we can look at how warm the waters are, and that certainly has contribute­d to how intense Michael is and its intensific­ation.”

The warm waters, Kossin said, are a “human fingerprin­t” of climate change.

Kossin and others have a study out this month in the Journal of Climate with computer simulation­s showing that humancause­d global warming will increase rapid intensific­ation of tropical weather across the globe in the future.

Other studies have shown rapid intensific­ation has already increased over past decades. One study this year in Geophysica­l Research Letters found that since 1986, the rate of intensific­ation of storms such as Michael has increased by about 13 mph.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States