The Denver Post

How to punish legal immigrants

- By Catherine Rampell

Many people assume that the Trump administra­tion’s immigratio­n agenda is about punishing the undocument­ed. But for a taste of how it is punishing legal immigrants — and their U.S.citizen families — consider the case of Maria, a doctor who came to California legally from Mexico.

The first thing you need to know is that when her first child was born, five years ago, Maria had trouble breastfeed­ing.

Her medical training had taught her how important good nutrition is for newborns. But reading textbooks and treating patients didn’t help her when her own baby wouldn’t latch, or when breastfeed­ing was painful, or she couldn’t produce enough milk.

Maria was far from home. She didn’t have anyone nearby she could turn to for advice. Worse, her marriage was deteriorat­ing. She worried how she’d support a child on her own since her Mexican credential­s didn’t authorize her to practice medicine in the United States.

“I was here alone,” said Maria, who spoke to me (both for this column and a PBS “NewsHour” segment) on the condition that I not disclose her last name because she fears retaliatio­n from immigratio­n authoritie­s. “No family, no friends.”

Salvation came from the federally funded Special Supplement­al Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), which offered lactation support and, later, nutritiona­l and parenting guidance.

“To receive that call every week and [have them] tell me, ‘Oh, just keep trying. You can do this. If you have another question you can call us’ — it was a lot of help,” she recalled.

Maria eventually divorced. Two years ago, she married a nativeborn U.S. citizen who sponsored her for a green card. This past summer, the family welcomed a baby girl.

Within days, though, the newborn lost a frightenin­g amount of weight. Maria was again having trouble producing enough milk. Her pediatrici­an recommende­d enrolling in WIC, which would provide free formula.

But this time, Maria didn’t apply.

She’d heard — from friends, from the news — that the Trump administra­tion might kick her out of the country if her family used any antipovert­y benefits. It didn’t matter that her baby (like her older daughter, and her husband) is a U.S. citizen, legally entitled to such services. Maria feared that any help she sought for her children might threaten her own ability to stay here. And she had reason to worry. From his earliest days in office, President Trump has sought to reinterpre­t — that is, massively expand — something called the “public charge” rule. It’s a relatively vague part of federal law used to screen whether an immigrant is likely to be financiall­y selfsuffic­ient or end up on the dole.

Under longstandi­ng federal policy, this rule primarily meant seeing whether more than half of an immigrant’s income came from cash welfare assistance.

But based on multiple, confusing, everchangi­ng, leaked proposals, the Trump administra­tion has long wanted to multiply the list of red flags. Sometimes if a U.S.citizen child was on Medicaid, that could disqualify the immigrant parent; sometimes not.

By the time the administra­tion published its official proposal for public comment last week, the rule — although still harsher than current policy — had narrowed significan­tly. Meanwhile, fear and confusion have already infiltrate­d immigrant communitie­s.

The current proposal, for instance, no longer treats WIC as potentiall­y disqualify­ing for immigrants. But Maria is still unwilling to enroll her infant. “Everything is changing and this year is OK, but maybe next year is not OK,” she said.

The Trump administra­tion declined a request for an interview, but it’s hard not to wonder whether this chilling effect was deliberate. At the very least, it was predictabl­e.

This is not just a bleedinghe­art story. For all the Trump administra­tion’s rhetoric about saving public dollars, it’s also likely fiscally backward. Families are pulling their kids out of safetynet programs that we know turn children into bettereduc­ated, more productive taxpayers, who are less likely to need public services in adulthood.

Not to mention the risks these children face if an expanded public charge rule results in more families fractured across borders.

“Who,” Maria asked, “is going to raise my kids?”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States