Working past 65? A degree is a plus
Health, physical jobs take toll on many bluecollar employees
NEW YORK» Close to one in five Americans who’s 65 or older is still working, the highest percentage in more than half a century. And it’s the ones who are still working who may be better off.
As more Americans delay retirement, it’s those with a college degree that find it easiest to keep working past 65. Their lesseducated peers, meanwhile, are having a more difficult time staying in the workforce.
It’s a crucial distinction because financial experts say both groups would benefit from working an extra year or more to improve their retirement security. By staying on the job, older Americans can build up their savings, which in too many cases are inadequate. Plus, they can allow bigger Social Security benefits to accrue. Besides, many older Americans like the idea of staying engaged by working.
Lesseducated Americans, though, aren’t always able to follow this path, even though they tend to have less in retirement savings. Instead, many are forced to retire before their mid60s because of poor health, the inability to do jobs that require a lot of physical activity or other reasons.
“If lesseducated people were retiring early and comfortable in their retirement years, good for them, but we know they aren’t,” said Matt Rutledge, research economist at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
There is a widening gap in retirement ages between college
and highschool graduates, Rutledge says, one that is most apparent when looking at the average age of retirement for men. The increasing number of women in the workforce in recent decades can skew the overall figures.
Men with college degrees are retiring at an average age of 65.7, according to Rutledge’s calculations, based on government data. That’s nearly three years later than men with only highschool degrees, who are retiring at an average age of 62.8.
In the late 1970s, though, the two groups were retiring at nearly the same age: 64.6 for college graduates and 64.1 for highschool graduates.
“We see people intending to work a whole lot longer, but the problem is that for the most part, it’s a lot easier for the college graduates to fulfill that plan,” Rutledge said.
What’s driving the retirement divide
This divide between highly and lesseducated Americans begins long before the golden years. Starting from their 20s, college graduates are more likely to have jobs and to make more money than their lesseducated peers. Last year, for example, the typical college graduate earned nearly twothirds more than the typical highschool graduate, among all workers aged 25 and above.
That’s driving a split in retirement savings: The typical households run by someone with a college degree has $116,900 in a retirement account, more than triple the $36,000 median for households run by someone with only a highschool diploma.
Health is a big factor in deciding when to retire, Rutledge said. A stroke, heart attack or depression could knock anyone into an earlierthanexpected retirement, but lesseducated Americans tend to have worse health as a group than their highereducated peers.
Lesseducated Americans also are more likely to be in physically demanding jobs, which are tougher to keep as age increases.
Among men aged 50 and older, for example, 61 percent of workers without a college degree have to move heavy loads (or people) as a regular part of their job.
That’s more than double the 23 percent rate of their collegegraduate peers, according to researchers at Harvard University, RAND Corp. and the University of California, Los Angeles. Lowereducated workers also are much more likely to have jobs that require them to stand all the time, do repetitive hand movements or be in tiring or painful positions.
“It’s much easier to work sitting down at a computer at 65 than in a warehouse,” said Craig Copeland, senior research associate with the Employee Benefit Research Institute.
The federal government said recently that 19.2 percent of everyone aged 65 and older was employed as of September. That’s tied for the highest rate since 1962, and nearly double the level of the mid1980s.
Why keep working
Incentives are aligned for people to keep working — even past their mid60s.
When clients at wealth adviser Brouwer & Janachowski come to CEO Stephen Janachowski, he shows them how much in spending money they’ll have each year in retirement, if they retire at 62. But then he shows how much larger that number would be if they wait until 67 — as much as 50 percent higher in some cases.
“We’re not even trying to talk them into it,” he said. “It’s more giving them options. Do you want to be able to take more trips, spend more time with your family, and is it worth it to you to work longer and have more of those things?”
Consider someone who turns 66 this year and would get $1,000 monthly as their Social Security benefit. If that person had retired at 62, their monthly benefit would have been only $750. For each year they delay getting benefits past 66, the size of that benefit will grow by 8 percent, until they reach age 70.
A busy set of golden years
Gerry Goldsholle just celebrated his 78th birthday, and he’s still working. He has degrees from William and Mary and Columbia University, and after a roughly twodecade career with Metlife, he took an earlyretirement offer when he was 50 years old.
His first wife had recently died, and he was ready for a big change. But after just three months of retirement, he was bored. “I missed the action and working with smart people,” he said.
He started doing consulting work after people from his days with Metlife reached out to him for help with projects. This gig grew into Advice Co., which runs the legaladvice site FreeAdvice.com. Goldsholle is CEO of the company and also travels extensively with his wife — he remarried in 1996 — who says she would prefer that he “reretire.”
“But I think she knows that’s not likely as long as I remain healthy and so long as my colleagues and I feel I am making a positive contribution,” he said in an email interview.