The Denver Post

Hurdle emerges as clock is ticking

Border security talks slow Sunday ahead of Friday’s deadline

- By Jonathan Lemire and Alan Fram

WASHINGTON» Bargainers clashed Sunday over whether to limit the number of migrants authoritie­s can detain, tossing a new hurdle before negotiator­s hoping to strike a border security compromise for Congress to pass this coming week. The White House wouldn’t rule out a renewed partial government shutdown if an agreement isn’t reached.

With the Friday deadline approachin­g, the two sides remained separated by hundreds of millions of dollars over how much to spend to construct President Donald Trump’s promised border wall. But rising to the fore was a related dispute over curbing Customs and Immigratio­n Enforcemen­t, or ICE, the federal agency that Republican­s see as an emblem of tough immigratio­n policies and Democrats accuse of often going too far.

Acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, in appearance­s on NBC’s “Meet the Press” and “Fox News Sunday,” said “you absolutely cannot” eliminate the possibilit­y of an-

other shutdown if a deal is not reached over the wall and other border matters. The White House had asked for $5.7 billion, a figure rejected by the Democratic-controlled House of Representa­tives, and the mood among bargainers has soured, according to people familiar with the negotiatio­ns not authorized to speak publicly about private talks.

“You cannot take a shutdown off the table, and you cannot take $5.7 (billion) off the table,” Mulvaney told NBC, “but if you end up someplace in the middle, yeah, then what you probably see is the president say, ‘Yeah, OK, and I’ll go find the money someplace else.’ ”

A congressio­nal deal seemed to stall even after Mulvaney convened a bipartisan group of lawmakers at Camp David. While the two sides seemed close to clinching a deal last week, significan­t gaps remain and momentum appears to have slowed. Although congressio­nal Democratic aides asserted that the dispute had caused the talks to break off, it was initially unclear how damaging the rift was. Both sides are eager to resolve the long-running battle and avert a fresh closure of dozens of federal agencies that would begin next weekend if Congress doesn’t act by Friday.

“I think talks are stalled right now,” Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said Sunday on “Fox News Sunday.” “I’m not confident we’re going to get there.”

But Mulvaney did signal that the White House would prefer not to have a repeat of the last shut- down, which stretched more than a month, left more than 800,000 government workers without paychecks, forced a postponeme­nt of the State of the Union address and sent Trump’s poll numbers tumbling.

This time, Mulvaney signaled that the White House may be willing to take whatever congressio­nal money comes — even if less than Trump’s goal — and then supplement that with other government funds.

The president’s supporters have suggested that Trump could use executive powers to divert money from the federal budget for wall constructi­on, though it was unclear if he would face challenges in Congress or the courts.

But declaring a national emergency remained an option, Mulvaney said, even though many in the administra­tion have cooled on the prospect.

The fight over ICE detentions goes to the core of each party’s view on immigratio­n.

Republican­s favor tough enforcemen­t of immigratio­n laws and have little interest in easing them if Democrats refuse to fund the Mexican border wall. Democrats despise the proposed wall and, in return for border security funds, want to curb what they see as unnecessar­ily harsh enforcemen­t by ICE.

People involved in the talks say Democrats have proposed limiting the number of immigrants here illegally who are caught inside the U.S. — not at the border — that the agency can detain. Republican­s say they don’t want that cap to apply to immigrants caught committing crimes, but Democrats do.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States