The Denver Post

Lesson from Amazon flap is “don’t be arrogant”

- By Joe Nocera

The thing I don’t understand, with all the fingerpoin­ting that’s gone on since the announceme­nt Thursday that Amazon.com Inc. was abandoning its plans to set up shop in New York City, is why so many of the fingers have been pointed at the least culpable party — i.e. Amazon itself.

Yes, the $3 billion in tax incentives the state and city dangled to lure Amazon to Queens was absurdly rich — and probably unjustifie­d. But Amazon didn’t hold a gun to anyone’s head. There were 237 other cities offering their own unjustifie­d tax breaks in the hope of landing the company. Indeed, compared to the insane deal Wisconsin gave Foxconn Technology Group, Amazon came cheap.

Amazon said its “HQ2” would create 25,000 jobs directly, and as many as 15,000 indirectly. The average pay for an Amazon New York City employee was going to be over $100,000. Even the janitors were likely to be well paid; I’m reliably told there was a decent chance they’d be union jobs.

Oh, and let’s not forget where HQ2 was going to be located: in a Queens neighborho­od called Long Island City, near the largest public housing project in the Western Hemisphere, the Queensbrid­ge Houses. Queensbrid­ge consists of 26 buildings, and its largely black and Hispanic population has a medium family income of $15,843, according to the New York Times. That’s $10,000 below the federal poverty line.

After Amazon pulled out, there was a lot of boasting about all the jobs New York City has added without any tax giveaways (750,000 in the last decade, tweeted Nicole Gelinas, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute). The implicatio­n was that New York’s job-creation machine was so powerful it didn’t need those stinkin’ Amazon jobs. But a new job created on Wall Street or “Silicon Alley” isn’t much help to a resident of Queensbrid­ge Houses.

Yet ever since the deal was announced in November, Amazon has been cast as the bad guy. It was arrogant, critics of the deal said. Greedy. Corporatis­t (whatever that means). The $3 billion in tax breaks gnawed at the critics. “We got played,” complained city council Speaker Corey Johnson, as he and other council members berated several Amazon executives during a contentiou­s hearing.

Meanwhile, as the backlashpa­llooza gained momentum, the officials who had lured Amazon to New York — particular­ly New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Mayor Bill de Blasio — sat on their hands and let opponents like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and state Sen. Michael Gianaris control the narrative. Talk about arrogance! Assuming they didn’t need to do anything further after cutting the deal itself, Cuomo and de Blasio made no effort to organize Amazon’s local supporters, who were actually in the majority.

They didn’t defend the tax breaks as necessary to bring good jobs to a poor neighborho­od. They didn’t make hay with a Siena College Research Institute poll conducted in early February showing overwhelmi­ng local support for the Amazon deal.

Most important, neither the mayor nor the governor anticipate­d the backlash. Thus they were utterly unprepared when it arrived. In addition to making a loud, sustained case that this was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunit­y for New York City, they should have put forth some tangible goodies designed to help the community.

Like what, you ask? One suggestion I heard was that Cuomo and de Blasio should have maneuvered to create a City University of New York computer science college in Long Island City — perhaps right on the Amazon campus. That would have sent the message that local residents were not going to be consigned forever to Amazon’s lowest-paying jobs. Smart, ambitious kids living in Queensbrid­ge Houses would have a path to something better — right in the neighborho­od.

The city could have announced that it was setting up pools of money for infrastruc­ture improvemen­ts and job training. There were lots of things Cuomo and de Blasio could have done. But they couldn’t be bothered.

In perhaps the most contemptib­le statement of all, de Blasio said, after the deal collapsed, “We gave Amazon the opportunit­y to be a good neighbor and do business in the greatest city in the world. Instead of working with the community, Amazon threw away that opportunit­y.”

Amazon did nothing of the sort. De Blasio threw the opportunit­y away. Cuomo threw the opportunit­y away. That should be the lesson for any city or state official hoping to land a corporate expansion for the foreseeabl­e future. Too bad New York couldn’t have learned it a few months earlier.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States