The Denver Post

Harris’ health care retreat shows it never pays to follow the herd

- By Jennifer Rubin

The meme, pushed by President Donald Trump, that the Democrats have all gone far left turns out to be, in the words of former Vice President Joe Biden, a moderate who still leads the presidenti­al primary race, a “bunch of malarkey.” The Washington Post reports:

“I don’t think it was any secret that I was not entirely comfortabl­e — that’s an understate­ment,” Harris said, holding a to-go cup from a Mexican restaurant at a recent stop.

“I finally was like, ‘I can’t make this circle fit into a square.’ I said: ‘We’re going to take hits. People are going to say she’s waffling. It’s going to be awful.’ ” But, she said, she decided it was worth it.

The Post also wrote: The Democratic senator from California is hardly alone. The idea of Medicare for all — a unified government health program that would take over the basic function of private insurance — became a liberal litmus test at the outset of the presidenti­al campaign, distinguis­hing Democratic contenders who cast themselves as bold visionarie­s from more moderate pragmatist­s.

Well, the only ones who seem to be pushing for it as a litmus test are Trump, who wants to define the Democrats as socialists; self-described socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.; and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., who every now and then sounds like she has room for a step-by-step approach.

Harris and others who have decided against full-blown Medicare for all should be commended, not ridiculed as “small thinkers” for eschewing an enormously costly and choice-averse concept at a time Americans want discrete, concrete things (e.g., low drug prices). By listening to experts and voters, watching poll numbers and thinking strategica­lly about how to beat Trump, Harris likely made the best political decision, longterm, for her campaign. There are good policy and political reasons to wind up where she did.

First, Medicare for all is totally unnecessar­y. If you give people the option of selecting Medicare, then all the problems described by proponents of Medicare for all go away.

Those people won’t get surprise bills. They won’t have to

hassle with insurance companies.

They won’t have to work about escalating premiums. By telling voters they cannot even have the choice, Sanders and Warren channel the liberal stereotype of people who don’t allow others to make their own decisions, even ones the two senators insist are obvious.

Second, Sanders and Warren have yet to grapple fully with the cost. Shouldn’t someone with a revolution­ary plan to change the face of health insurance tell us in detail how much it will cost and who is going to pay? This is not simply a quaint affection for fiscal sobriety.

If the price is outlandish­ly high, then the idea is never going to happen, supporters should fess up. Moreover, the bigger the price tag, the more obvious it is how many people will have taxes raised.

Who exactly? By how much? It seems highly unusual that Warren, who’s got a well-thought-out proposal for everything, hasn’t thought through the full ramificati­ons of her most controvers­ial proposal.

On the political front, Warren and Sanders are now wrestling for the votes of the most progressiv­e voters.

Biden’s poll numbers to date, however, suggest a candidate aiming for a wider ideologica­l coalition in the primary can do just fine, and quite possibly win. That becomes even more true as the race gets down to the final three to five candidates. Why try to out-Sanders and out-Warren the two Medicare-for-all proponents when the winner could very well be Biden or the person prepared to scoop up Biden voters if and when he falters?

And finally, a nominee who avoids Medicare for all makes it that much easier to oust Trump. Plenty of voters are tired of gigantic, unfulfille­d promises to reinvent the Affordable Care Act, which they finally have figured out and like. (Thanks to Trump, the ACA still draws close to majority support.) You shift the health care debate back where it should be: Trump tried to take away health care once; if re-elected, is there any doubt he will do it?

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States