The Denver Post

New laws crack down on jail informants

- By Dave Collins

A movement to put jailhouse informants under a more powerful microscope before they testify is gaining traction across the country, a byproduct of new DNA testing technology that has exonerated dozens of people wrongly locked up based on informants’ lies.

Several states have moved to toughen regulation­s on the use of such informants, whose credibilit­y has always been an issue because they’re motived to get their sentences reduced.

The new rules include requiring pretrial hearings on whether prisoners’ testimony should be allowed and forcing prosecutor­s to disclose any deals with informants as well as their history of testifying in other cases.

In Connecticu­t, Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont signed a wide-ranging bill in July that will create the nation’s first statewide system to track the use of jailhouse informants, including any benefits offered in exchange for their testimony.

“We’re really seeing the issue gain momentum around the country,” said Rebecca Brown, policy director for the New Yorkbased Innocence Project, which works to exonerate the wrongly convicted. “Jailhouse informant testimony is one of the leading factors in wrongful conviction­s.”

Of the 365 people exonerated nationwide by DNA evidence, nearly one in five were convicted based in part on lying informants, according to the Innocence Project.

Federal court rulings and the Constituti­on do require prosecutor­s to turn over certain informatio­n about witnesses, including exculpator­y evidence favorable to the defense. But civil liberties advocates say new laws are needed to specify exactly what kind of informatio­n must be disclosed including key details about informants.

While prosecutor­s agree that there needs to be skepticism about jailhouse informants, they say such witnesses offer crucial, truthful informatio­n that helps bring perpetrato­rs to justice in many cases. Some worry that new informant laws take witness credibilit­y determinat­ions out of the hands of juries and leave it to judges to decide before cases even go to trial.

Fellow inmates were key in bringing down Connecticu­t serial killer William Howell, who is serving a life sentence for killing seven people in 2003. One of Howell’s cellmates, convicted killer of four Jonathan Mills, told authoritie­s that Howell talked about the killings and where he buried the victims. It’s not clear whether Mills, also serving life in prison, received any benefits for providing the informatio­n.

 ?? Associated Press file ?? Miguel Roman, center, hugs a correction­s officer in 2011 at Superior Court in Hartford, Conn., after Pedro Miranda was sentenced to life in prison for the murder of Roman’s girlfriend, Carmen Lopez. Roman served almost two decades in prison for her killing before being freed in 2008 based on new DNA evidence. Several states have moved to toughen regulation­s on the use of jailhouse informants. Advocates said Roman’s erroneous conviction was based in part on the testimony of lying inmates.
Associated Press file Miguel Roman, center, hugs a correction­s officer in 2011 at Superior Court in Hartford, Conn., after Pedro Miranda was sentenced to life in prison for the murder of Roman’s girlfriend, Carmen Lopez. Roman served almost two decades in prison for her killing before being freed in 2008 based on new DNA evidence. Several states have moved to toughen regulation­s on the use of jailhouse informants. Advocates said Roman’s erroneous conviction was based in part on the testimony of lying inmates.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States