The Denver Post

Heavily divided Fed reduces rates

Chairman suggests further cuts not likely in ’19, unless economy weakens

- By Martin Crutsinger

WASHINGTON» A sharply divided Federal Reserve cut its benchmark interest rate Wednesday for a second time this year but declined to signal that further rate cuts are likely this year.

The Fed’s move reduced its key short-term rate — which influences many consumer and business loans — by an additional quarter point to a range of 1.75% to 2%.

The action was approved 7-3, with two officials preferring to keep rates unchanged and one arguing for a bigger half-point cut. The divisions on the policy committee underscore­d the challenges for Chairman Jerome Powell in guiding the Fed at a time of high economic uncertaint­y.

The Fed did leave the door open to additional rate cuts — if, as Powell suggested at a news conference, the economy weakens. For now, he suggested, the economic expansion appears durable in its 11th year, with a stillsolid job market and steady consumer spending.

At the same time, the Fed is trying to combat threats including uncertaint­ies caused by President Donald Trump’s trade war with China, slower global growth and a slump in U.S. manufactur­ing. The Fed noted in its statement that business investment and exports have weakened.

At his news conference, Powell acknowledg­ed that Fed officials are sharply divided about the wisest course for interest rates, especially given uncertaint­ies, like trade conflicts, whose outcomes are out of the Fed’s control.

“This is a time of difficult judgments and disparate perspectiv­es,” Powell said.

In any case, many business leaders are skeptical that the Fed’s slight rate cuts will deliver much economic benefit.

Wednesday’s rate cut “makes virtually no difference to the U.S. economy in and of itself,” said Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase, who suggested, as many corporate leaders have, that Trump’s trade war remains an overarchin­g threat.

“I don’t think cutting rates will offset trade, personally,” said Dimon, head of the largest U.S. bank.

Among Powell’s challenges is that the trade war’s uncertaint­ies are likely affecting the nation’s economic data, making it hard for the Fed to set an interest-rate policy for the months ahead.

“It doesn’t make sense to commit to a path of policy today when monetary policy is now responding to future developmen­ts in the trade policy,” said Bill Adams, a senior economist at PNC Financial Services.

Wednesday’s modest rate cut irritated Trump, who has attacked the central bank and insisted that it slash rates more aggressive­ly. The president immediatel­y signaled his discontent: “Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve Fail Again,” Trump tweeted. “No ‘guts,’ no sense, no vision! A terrible communicat­or!”

Asked about Trump’s latest personal taunt, Powell declined, as he has before, to respond directly, while adding that the Fed’s longstandi­ng independen­ce from political pressures “has served the public well.”

Updated economic and interest rate forecasts issued Wednesday by the Fed show that only seven of 17 officials foresee at least one additional rate cut this year. And at least two Fed officials expect a rate hike next year.

None of the policymake­rs foresee rates falling below 1.5% in 2020 — a sign that the turbulence from a global slowdown and Trump’s escalation of the trade war is viewed as manageable.

The median forecasts show the economy is expected to grow a modest 2.2% this year, 2% next year and 1.9% in 2021. Those forecasts are well below the Trump administra­tion’s projection that the president’s policies will accelerate growth to 3% annually or better. But they also suggest that policymake­rs do not envision a recession.

Unemployme­nt is projected to be 3.7% and inflation 1.5%, below the Fed’s target level of 2%.

A resumption of trade talks between the Trump administra­tion and Beijing and a less antagonist­ic tone between the two sides have supported the view that additional rate cuts might not be necessary. So has a belief that oil prices will remain elevated, that inflation might finally be reaching the Fed’s target level and that there are increasing signs that the U.S. economy remains sturdy.

The job market looks solid, wages are rising, consumers are still spending and even such sluggish sectors as manufactur­ing and constructi­on have shown signs of rebounding.

Yet no one, perhaps not even the Fed, is sure of how interest rate policy will unfold in coming months. Too many uncertaint­ies exist, notably the outcome of Trump’s trade war.

Trump has kept up a stream of public attacks on the central bank’s policymaki­ng, including referring to Powell as an “enemy” and the Fed’s policymake­rs as “boneheads.” Even though the economy looks resilient, the president has insisted that the Fed slash its benchmark rate more deeply — even to below zero, as the European Central Bank has done — in part to weaken the U.S. dollar and make American exports more competitiv­e.

“It doesn’t make sense to commit to a path of (interest rate) policy today when monetary policy is now responding to future developmen­ts in the trade policy.”

Bill Adams, senior economist at PNC Financial Services

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States