The Denver Post

How remote work will create economic winners and losers

- By Noam Scheiber

When the pandemic hit and tens of millions of U.S. workers suddenly redeployed to their basements and living rooms, it was easy to imagine that their workdays would unfold roughly as before, with communicat­ion tools such as Slack and Zoom substituti­ng for face-to-face interactio­ns (and maybe with slightly greater multitaski­ng opportunit­ies).

But the shift to a heavily remote workforce — companies such as Facebook and Twitter have announced that they will allow many employees to work from home permanentl­y — has the potential to change people’s work lives in much more profound ways. It could significan­tly affect their wages, alter career prospects and restructur­e organizati­ons. And as with many economic shocks, workers are likely to be affected unevenly.

The changes that remote work is accelerati­ng “are a disaster for low-skilled labor and could be a good thing for high-skilled labor,” said Gerald Davis, a professor of management and sociology at the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business who has written extensivel­y about shifting work arrangemen­ts. “I anticipate it having this centrifuga­l effect.”

Many workers could see an increase in disposable income and flexibilit­y, but others could be pushed into contractin­g arrangemen­ts that lower their wages and make their livelihood­s more precarious. Even highly skilled workers may find it harder to band together to improve their pay and working conditions.

So-called fully distribute­d companies, where everyone works remotely, often pay employees somewhat less than they might earn in the most expensive metropolit­an areas but more than they would make elsewhere.

DuckDuckGo, an internet privacy company with a well-regarded search engine, formally bases its compensati­on on salaries at a group of technology companies across the United States, excluding the San Francisco Bay Area. Automattic, maker of the website-building tool WordPress, pays employees based on job responsibi­lities and qualificat­ions regardless of location. (By contrast, tech companies with physical headquarte­rs often pay workers less if they live in a less expensive area.)

This benefits skilled workers living outside the most expen

sive markets, and especially where jobs with generous pay are scarce. Jason Caldwell, a marketing manager at WordPress, makes safely into the six figures working from Billings, Mont.. He is hoping to buy a 100-plus-acre plot where members of his family can build homes.

And while wages for high-skilled workers in the Bay Area could increase less quickly as a more remote world reduces local competitio­n for talent, even they could come out ahead in the end. Reduced hiring of affluent workers in the Bay Area would also mean fewer bidders for real estate, slowing the rise in housing prices, said Adam Ozimek, chief economist of Upwork, an online freelancin­g marketplac­e.

The deeper change is organizati­onal. At a typical company, small chunks of informatio­n relevant to one’s work tend to be scattered throughout the organizati­on — with the woman on the other side of your desk pod, the guy three cubicles over, the manager at the end of the hall. This forces workers into a series of personto-person interactio­ns throughout the day, making it necessary for them to keep similar hours even when that’s not convenient.

By contrast, distribute­d organizati­ons such as DuckDuckGo and Automattic seek to “separate individual­s from the informatio­n they possess” and create a centralize­d “knowledge repository,” Stanford business scholar Jen Rhymer has written. This makes it possible for employees to complete their assignment­s from anywhere, at almost any time of day, without having to check in frequently with colleagues.

At Automattic, which spreads its roughly 1,200 full-time workers across more than 75 countries, managers such as Caldwell often spend about four hours a day reading and writing memos on one of the company’s internal blogs, known as P2s.

They document any developmen­t that might be relevant to their co-workers — everything from “Google Chrome just announced a change; here’s what I understand about it,” Caldwell said, to a descriptio­n of an effort to highlight the company’s one-on-one training sessions for users.

At DuckDuckGo, which has about 100 full-time workers across 17 countries, all relevant developmen­ts are recorded in a software program called Asana. In any given week, employees focus on their “top priority” contributi­on to a company project.

Gabriel Weinberg, DuckDuckGo’s founder and chief executive, said the company tried to keep the projects small and self-contained, with their goals and scope clearly detailed in a written template, allowing people to work independen­tly without constant coordinati­on.

“This system works best when it continues to be modular; there are not tons and tons of people on a project,” Weinberg said. “It’s easy to jump in as a new member. You read a one-page document and understand what’s going on with it quickly.”

DuckDuckGo, such as other distribute­d companies, also creates specific opportunit­ies for bonding. There is a weekly “neighbors meeting” in which four or five colleagues who don’t normally work together are randomly assigned to mingle, and an annual companywid­e gathering that is normally in person but was held online this year.

Several academics and industry experts said the changes might go even further. For example, remote companies, because they are set up to allow people to work efficientl­y on their own, are also well positioned to use contractor­s and other workers who are not employees.

“If you know how to have remote full-time employees, it’s much easier to have remote on-demand people from a freelancin­g platform,” said Stephane Kasriel, who until recently was chief executive of Upwork, which counts Automattic, the Wikimedia Foundation and other fully or heavily distribute­d organizati­ons as clients.

He added that much of what made this possible was sound management that companies with physical offices didn’t adopt simply because they could afford to be sloppy.

The ease of working as a freelancer can be a boon to many skilled workers, who can command high hourly rates through Upwork and other freelancin­g marketplac­es.

But for lower-skilled workers, such as those in customer service or data entry, working as a contractor tends to reduce wages and increase insecurity. Companies often pay low-skilled employees above-market wages because they have internal pay scales but pay only the market price for a contractor or freelancer.

Ozimek of Upwork acknowledg­ed that outsourcin­g work could reduce wages for low-skilled workers but said this didn’t take into account the lower cost of living for remote workers outside expensive cities and the job creation that platforms such as Upwork made possible by allowing new businesses to form and scale quickly. Both he and Kasriel said freelancer­s on

Upwork tended to be relatively skilled and well paid, as a new study from the company shows.

Even highly skilled workers could find less leverage at a distribute­d company than at one where they work in offices, however. Laurence Berland, a longtime Google engineer who was active in organizing workers there before he was fired last fall, said that digital tools made it easy to coordinate remotely among workers already involved in an organizing effort but that it was often difficult to recruit new workers who were not in the same physical space.

“Some people maybe correctly consider it a big red flag to say to someone on a corporate chat, ‘Hey, can we talk on a noncorpora­te device?’ ” Berland said.

One typical way of enlisting co-workers, he said, is to start a conversati­on after overhearin­g them complain about a company practice — something less likely to happen remotely.

Sandy Pope, bargaining director for the Office and Profession­al Employees Internatio­nal Union, which represents workers at the crowdfundi­ng site Kickstarte­r as well as university and clerical staff members elsewhere, said remote work could create inequality among workers performing the same job because it was harder for them to share informatio­n discreetly outside an office.

“There’s a lack of transparen­cy,” Pope said, “the lack of ability to even track what’s going on.”

Whatever the case, it appears that more and more traditiona­l companies are exploring how to use the setup to better advantage. Upwork’s client registrati­ons have increased significan­tly during the pandemic, Ozimek said, although a need for cost savings may partly explain it as well.

 ?? Shirley Yu, © The New York Times Co. ?? Jason Caldwel, a marketing manager at WordPress, is on a video call from Billings, Mont., in Edison, N.J., last weekend. Caldwell’s employer pays workers based on job responsibi­lities and qualificat­ions, regardless of location.
Shirley Yu, © The New York Times Co. Jason Caldwel, a marketing manager at WordPress, is on a video call from Billings, Mont., in Edison, N.J., last weekend. Caldwell’s employer pays workers based on job responsibi­lities and qualificat­ions, regardless of location.
 ?? Michelle Gustafson, © The New York Times Co. file ?? Gabriel Weinberg, DuckDuckGo’s founder and chief executive, says the company has tried during the pandemic to keep its projects small, allowing people to work independen­tly without constant coordinati­on.
Michelle Gustafson, © The New York Times Co. file Gabriel Weinberg, DuckDuckGo’s founder and chief executive, says the company has tried during the pandemic to keep its projects small, allowing people to work independen­tly without constant coordinati­on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States