The Denver Post

No use denying the way political wind is blowing

- By Ian Silverii

Republican­s across Colorado are bracing for another annihilati­on on Election Day 2020. The spin coming from the right- wing chattering class is as dizzying as a tilt- awhirl atop a carousel chained to an enormous see- saw bolted to a centrifuge. It is apparently the job of every conservati­ve politician, talking head, and Twitter troll in the state to pretend in advance that they aren’t really losing the election despite another impending Democratic landslide.

You’ve heard all of this before. The same arguments were made — and rubber- stamped by the local media — after 2018 delivered Democrats historic majorities in the Colorado legislatur­e, all statewide elected offices on the ballot that year, and victory in the GOP- held 6th Congressio­nal District. Mike Coffman held that seat for a decade, but lost in an 11 point drubbing to nowCongres­sman Democrat Jason Crow. This year, Congressma­n

Crow is cruising to reelection, facing a token challenge from former GOP state party chairman Steve House. Even the red 3rd Congressio­nal District held by the GOP for a decade is in play, thanks to the nomination of an unqualifie­d, far- right candidate Lauren Boebert against the immensely credential­ed Democrat Diane Mitsch Bush.

In 2018, Republican­s attempted to spin the defeat of a few ballot measures — an education tax increase, a confusingl­y- written road- funding initiative, and an oil and gas setback law that faced millions of dollars in opposition spending — as a conservati­ve victory despite massive Democratic wins up and down the ticket. In truth, there were roughly an equal number of ballot initiative­s from conservati­ve and progressiv­e interests, and the vast majority of them failed. The exceptions, were electoral no- brainers: Amendments Y and Z to create an independen­t legislativ­e and congressio­nal redistrict­ing and reapportio­nment commission, cracking down on payday loans, industrial hemp, and literally the abolition of slavery from Colorado’s constituti­on. It was progressiv­es who fought for Amendment A to abolish slavery, and Propositio­n 111 to regulate predatory payday loans. It was a bipartisan group that fought for independen­t redistrict­ing. In the end, the scoreboard was still advantagep­rogressive­s when all the votes were tallied.

In 2020, the game remains the same. Conservati­ve operatives will point to the likely passage of a favorably- worded tax cut as evidence that Colorado is “fiscally conservati­ve,” and on that basis claim Democrats who will have just won basically every competitiv­e election in the state somehow do not have a mandate to govern and enact their agenda. Coloradans also are poised to approve a generous and universal system of paid family and medical leave.

One difference this year is that the same self- appointed “business community” frequently cited by Republican­s as their core supporters now opposes the regressive tax cut found in

Propositio­n 116, as well as Propositio­n 117 which takes the terrible idea of TABOR and makes it even worse. They may have finally begun to understand the harm to our economy these “conservati­ve” fiscal policies do at the expense of schools, roads, and health care for the rest of us.

Unlike TABOR’s semantic rigging of revenue- increasing ballot measures, nothing in the language of Propositio­n 116 tells you that it will cost the state upwards of $ 250 million per year.

Tax cuts are perenniall­y popular with voters, especially when you don’t have to disclose the consequenc­es. Paid leave is popular too. Those are understand­able choices for individual voters, who are not and shouldn’t be expected to be fiscalpoli­cy experts. For that matter, nor are they health care experts, bioethicis­ts, ecologists, sociologis­ts, public health profession­als or any of the other expertise needed to make these policy decisions.

That’s why we elect representa­tives to chart fiscal policy. If you live in Denver, you had to vote on twenty- three separate initiative­s this year, and nearly every one of them was a decision better made by policy experts and elected officials. Having to weigh this many obscure and confusing choices makes voting miserable and regrettabl­e, and discourage­s thoughtful participat­ion.

But I digress. Colorado voters handed Democrats a powerful mandate in 2018, and in all likelihood will do so again next Tuesday. Voters in Colorado elect Democrats to carry out a Democratic agenda. Everything else is cheap spin to console the election’s losers and their pricey consultant­s who continue to cash big checks as long as they can convince big conservati­ve donors that Colorado is still, indeed, a swing state.

Ian Silverii is the executive director of ProgressNo­w Colorado, the state’s largest progressiv­e advocacy group.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States