Rich hospitals profit from patients in car crashes
When Monica Smith was badly hurt in a car accident, she assumed Medicaid would cover the medical bills. Smith, 45, made sure to show her insurance card after an ambulance took her to Parkview Regional Medical Center in Fort Wayne, Ind. She spent three days in the hospital and weeks in a neck brace.
But the hospital never sent her bills to Medicaid, which would have paid for the care in full, and the hospital refused requests to do so. Instead, it pursued an amount five times higher from Smith directly by placing a lien on her accident settlement.
Parkview is among scores of wealthy hospitals that have quietly used centuryold hospital lien laws to increase revenue, often at the expense of low-income people such as Smith. By using liens — a claim on an asset, such as a home or a settlement payment, to make sure someone repays a debt — hospitals can collect on money that otherwise would have gone to the patient to compensate for pain and suffering.
They can also ignore the steep discounts they are contractually required to offer to health insurers, and instead pursue their full charges.
The difference between the two prices can be staggering. In Smith’s case, the bills that Medicaid would have paid, $2,500, ballooned to $12,856 when the hospital pursued a lien.
“It’s astounding to think Medicaid patients would be charged the full-billed price,” said Christopher Whaley, a health economist at the RAND Corp. who studies hospital pricing. “It’s absolutely unbelievable.”
The practice of bypassing insurers to pursue full charges from accident victims’ settlements has become routine in major health systems across the country, court records and interviews show. It is most lucrative when used against low-income patients with Medicaid, which tends to pay lower reimbursement rates than private health plans.
In a memo that surfaced in 2014 litigation, a hospital in Washington state estimated that this practice generated $10 million annually.
As part of its check-in process, a Catholic hospital in Oklahoma offers some accident victims a waiver to sign stating they do not want their health plan billed for care. One patient received the waiver shortly after a car accident in which her head hit the windshield. She said she had no recollection of signing the document, but faced a $34,106 lien as a result.
“The way they are spinning it is, you don’t want to use your health insurance because someone else caused this,” said Loren Toombs, an Oklahoma trial lawyer who represented the patient. “It’s clearly a business tactic and a huge issue, but it’s not always illegal.”
Hospitals have come under scrutiny in recent years for increasingly turning to the courts to recover patients’ unpaid bills,
even in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic. Hospitals, many of which received significant bailouts last year, have used these court rulings to garnish patients’ wages and take their homes.
But less attention has been paid to hospital lien laws, which many states passed in the early 20th century, when fewer than 10% of Americans had health coverage. The laws were meant to protect hospitals from the burden of caring for uninsured patients, and to give them an incentive to treat those who could not pay upfront.
“If there is a patient that has viable coverage from multiple sources, it would be a reasonable position to seek payment from whoever is going to pay more,” said Joe Fifer, chief executive of the Healthcare Financial Management Association, a trade group of hospital financial officers.
Fifer said that state and federal laws often dictate which insurer should be billed, and that hospitals regularly must navigate between health and auto insurers that claim the other is responsible. He advises member executives tobe clear at the out set with patients about how the lien process works.
“I feel sorry for patients in these situations,” Fifer said.
When states have permissive hospital lien laws, some hospitals take advantage in ways that hurt patients. These hospitals tend to be wealthier, The New York Times found, and many of those that received hundreds of millions of dollars in federal bailout funding during the pandemic are among the most aggressive in pursuing payment through hospital liens.
Community Health Systems, which owns 86 hospitals across the country, received about $250 million in federal funds during the pandemic, according to data compiled by Good Jobs First, which researches government subsidies of companies.
One of its hospitals in Tennessee refused to bill Medicare or the veterans health insurance of Jeremy Greenbaum after a car crash aggravated an old combat wound to his ankle. Instead, the hospital filed liens in 2019 for the full price of his care, records show.
“I could cut off a finger and the VA would cover it,” Greenbaum said, adding “the insurance is just that good.” The worst part, Greenbaum said, was the nearly constant collection calls that made him feel like a “real deadbeat.” Greenbaum is now part of a lawsuit against the hospital, Tennova Healthcare Clarksville, that accuses it of predatory lien practices.
Ann Metz, a spokeswoman for Tennova, said that “Tennessee state law allows hospitals to file provider liens as a way to ensure that health care providers can be paid for treatment.”
In the early 2010s, Indiana legislators passed a law that required hospitals to bill insured patients’ coverage before pursuing additional debts with a lien.
The legislation initially specified Medicare, Medicaid and private health plans as those that had to be billed. At the last minute, Medicaid was taken out. Supporters of the new law paid little attention to the change, assuming that legislation requiring hospitals to bill “health insurance” would suffice.