The Denver Post

Trump’s Republican­s, brought to their knees

- By Frank Bruni

During the first of the three presidenti­al impeachmen­ts in my lifetime, we contemplat­ed the smudging of a blue dress. During the second, the smearing of a political rival.

During this one, which ended with Donald Trump’s predictabl­e but infuriatin­g acquittal? The shrieking of a police officer as a mob crushed and bloodied him. It was rawer and uglier. So is America.

But I keep thinking about the late 1990s, Bill Clinton, that whole melodrama and how Republican­s used it in the service of a particular identity for their party. I keep thinking about what a lie that identity was then and what an absolute joke it is now.

Republican­s sought to define themselves as the caretakers of tradition, the guardians of propriety, the proudly oldfashion­ed champions of honor, order, patriotism and such. Clinton’s background, especially the accusation­s of infidelity, helped them do that. They turned him into a symbol of America’s turpitude. They reasoned that the more thoroughly they demonized him (and Hillary), the more persuasive­ly they sanctified themselves.

He was lies and they were truth. He was lust and they were modesty.

Monica Lewinsky dropped into that crusade like a gift from the gods. What you saw on the faces of many Republican­s as they discussed Clinton’s dalliance with her wasn’t indignatio­n. It was glee, and it fueled the charade that men like Newt Gingrich — who was then the House speaker and was cheating on his second wife with the much younger woman who would become his third — were the bulwarks against moral chaos.

Chaos. That’s precisely what Trump wrought. Not metaphoric chaos, but actual chaos, deadly chaos, on grueling, gutting display in the footage of Jan. 6 that House Democrats presented at his Senate trial. It showed rioters coming for lawmakers like lions for lambs. (“Hang Mike Pence!” “Naaaaaancy, where are you?!?”) It showed lawmakers fleeing for their lives. It showed stampeding, smashing, stomping, screeching.

It showed hell, or something close enough that when all but seven Republican senators shrugged it off so that they could vote to acquit Trump, they finally forfeited any claim to virtue or to “values,” a word that had long been their mantra. They irrevocabl­y lost all rights to lecture voters on such things. They affirmed that they, like Gingrich, were gaseous with hot air all along.

They’re fine with hell, so long as they’re reelected.

The era of Trump has been the era of Republican unmasking, and many Republican­s didn’t have their masks successful­ly affixed in the first place. This trial and that footage left them nothing to hide behind. What Trump incited — the insanity of it, the profanity of it, the body count — represents the antithesis of everything that the party purported to hold dear.

Trump’s lawyers excused it and gave Republican senators their rationale for acquittal by talking about free speech but that cast the president of the United States — the most powerful person in the world, entrusted with the security of his country — as just any old crank spouting off. It minimized his station. It trivialize­d the stakes. It also overlooked that it’s not OK to yell “fire” in a crowded theater, though

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., reminded them of that, describing Jan. 6 as “a case where the town fire chief who’s paid to put out fires sends a mob not to yell ‘fire!’ in a crowded theater but to actually set the theater on fire.”

The lawyers also turned history on its head, essentiall­y bookending Trump’s presidency by minting the precise sorts of “alternativ­e facts” that Kellyanne Conway smugly heralded at the start. “Unlike the left, President Trump has been entirely consistent in his opposition to mob violence,” one of his lawyers, Michael van der Veen, said, scaling new summits of prepostero­usness. Trump blessed mob violence at his campaign rallies. He blessed mob violence in Charlottes­ville, Virginia. He’s against mob violence the way I’m against spaghetti carbonara. Which is to say that he thrills to it and eats it up.

Both before and during the Senate trial, Trump’s defenders asserted that there’s no clear causal link between his malfeasanc­e and that police officer’s screams. But the House Democrats effectivel­y destroyed that argument by documentin­g not only Trump’s words in the days, hours and minutes before the mob attacked but also his long, painstakin­g campaign to erode trust in democratic processes, so that if those processes didn’t favor him, his supporters were primed to junk them. He’s a study in slow-motion treason. Jan. 6 was simply when he slammed his foot down on the accelerato­r.

It was also, in retrospect, the climax that his presidency was always building toward, the inevitable fruit of his meticulous indoctrina­tion of his base, his methodical degradatio­n of American institutio­ns, his romancing of right-wing media and his recruitmen­t of the most ambitious and unscrupulo­us Republican lawmakers. At his behest, Josh Hawley, Ted Cruz and several other Republican senators promoted the lethal falsehood that the election was fraudulent, yet that didn’t disqualify them from sitting as jurors to render a foregone verdict on a man whose delusions they had already endorsed. What a system. What a farce.

They were distracted, cavalier jurors at that. Rick Scott, who of course voted “not guilty,” was seen studying and then fiddling with a map or maps of Asia. Dare we dream that he’s plotting his own relocation there? Hawley, who also voted “not guilty,” at one point moved to the visitors gallery above the Senate floor and did some reading there, his feet propped up, his lanky body a pretzel of petulance. What happened to Republican­s’ respect for authority? What happened to basic decency and decorum?

Clinton was a supposedly unendurabl­e offense against that, but then along came Trump, and Republican­s decided that decency and decorum were overrated. Truth, too. Heck, everything that they claimed to stand for in the Clinton years was now negotiable, expendable, vestigial. Nothing was beyond the pale.

But that footage was beyond the pale. Did you really look at it, Sens. Hawley, Scott and Cruz (yet another “not guilty”)? Did you see the blood and the terror on that police officer’s face? Do you honestly contend that there’s no connection between Trump’s lies — refined over years, repeated incessantl­y and rendered in the most incendiary fashion possible — and the officer’s pain?

Do you sleep soundly at night?

On Friday, as the trial drew nearer to the moment when senators would render their verdict, President Joe Biden was asked for his thoughts on the proceeding. “I’m just anxious to see what my Republican friends do — if they stand up,” he said.

What a generous statement. Trump brought these Republican­s to their knees long ago. Stand? They can barely crawl at this point.

Frank Bruni has been with The New York Times since 1995 and held a variety of jobs — including White House reporter, Rome bureau chief and chief restaurant critic — before becoming a columnist in 2011. He is the author of three best-selling books.

 ??  ??
 ?? Illustrati­on by Earl Wilson, The New York Times ??
Illustrati­on by Earl Wilson, The New York Times

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States