The Denver Post

“WandaVisio­n” gets female superheroe­s right — sort of

- By Maya Phillips

This article contains spoilers for “WandaVisio­n.”

We love our superheroe­s: charging into battle, dropping from the sky with an asphalt-cracking entrance, thrashing one another to a lively score. But nine times out of 10, the figure bearing the shield or swinging the mighty hammer — and delivering the final showstoppi­ng blow — is a man. As the ’90s girl group 702 famously asked, “where my girls at”?

For all of the enormousne­ss of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, the franchise has been remiss in its portrayal of female heroes and their power. The Disney+ series “WandaVisio­n,” which recently finished its first season, gave a preview of the ways the MCU could better serve its female heroes, by giving them the space for their characters to develop and evolve: to have relationsh­ips and suss out their wants and needs and also to show off the full range of their abilities.

But the pitfalls the series skirted also revealed what the franchise will need to avoid when navigating what heroism looks like inside and outside gender norms.

“WandaVisio­n” picks up after the events of “Avengers: Endgame,” in which Vision, the computer-consciousn­ess-turned-capedhero played by Paul Bettany, died. But in “WandaVisio­n,” he and his fellow Avenger and wife, Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen),

appear inexplicab­ly in a happy suburban life in a town called Westview, N.J., styled, episode by episode, as taking place in a different era of television sitcom.

Things are awry in this world, and Wanda eventually discovers that she — who is not your run-of-themill hero but the powerful Scarlet Witch — unknowingl­y created this fantasy, trapping the real residents of Westview within it. Vision and even her superpower­ed twin sons, who are born in this TV Landstyle world, are manifestat­ions of her magic, triggered as a reflexive response to her grief at the loss of her husband and her twin brother, Pietro. As Wanda seeks refuge from her tragedies in her bizarro version of Westview, military forces target her as a threat, and another witch infiltrate­s her world to try to find and steal the source of her magic.

“WandaVisio­n” is the first time in the Marvel franchise that we see the extent of Wanda’s power. Although she is a historical­ly powerful hero in comic book lore (in some versions, she’s even identified as the daughter of the mighty X-Men antagonist Magneto), Wanda was introduced in “Avengers: Age of Ultron” as a villain, a foot soldier to James Spader’s smooth-talking artificial intelligen­ce, Ultron. And yet her powers were vague and unstable: She occasional­ly created illusions and manipulate­d minds, but mostly she shot vague blasts of red light, especially as she eased her way into a permanent place

at the Avengers’ table.

This was a watered down representa­tion of a formidable hero. But why?

Some of the reasons are practical: narrative convenienc­e and the difficulty of visually rendering her complex powers. Wanda’s abilities, unlike those of many of the Avengers, require more than a few camera shots in the middle of a battle to unpack. In a franchise — and genre — known to profit from showy fight scenes, a few red blasts of light, though paltry, are more visually appealing and simpler to execute than abilities that bend reality and challenge consciousn­ess.

But the more frustratin­g reason is wrapped up with the aims of the franchise, which are more about longevity than they are about narrative logic. Wanda and Captain Marvel, the only other female Avenger to helm her own property so far, are the two members of the team who could have defeated the big bad of the last two Avengers films, Thanos. Because of that, the films clumsily maneuvered around these heroes, downplayin­g their powers or making them unavailabl­e so that the story could continue. It wouldn’t be so egregious if these powerful heroes weren’t also women.

But in their origin stories and ascent to power, these female heroes are also defined by the ways they exist within gender norms or fall victim to the power of men. In “WandaVisio­n,” Wanda is allowed a level of depth not often given to characters in superhero movies, with a brilliant look at her expression of grief. But the central conceit has her enacting a classic dichotomy: Can Wanda do her job as a hero, or can she have a quiet life as a wife and mother? As the series nears its end, this becomes the choice Wanda must make because her suburban sitcom — including her husband and kids — cannot exist unless she continues to manipulate the people of Westview against their will.

It’s one thing to finally get the female heroes we long for, and for those heroes to be at the center of their stories. But going forward, the MCU has to be better about treating those heroes with the nuance they deserve. That includes acknowledg­ing what female heroes have historical­ly been allowed to do compared with their male counterpar­ts; examining how deeply they’ve been made to buy into stereotypi­cal ideas of what women should be; and assessing the realities of what it means to be a woman wielding power in a maledomina­ted world. No one needs another superficia­l film equivalent of an ad campaign for female empowermen­t.

What would it have looked like for “Avengers: Endgame” to do more than a quick, perfectly posed group shot of the lady heroes fighting Thanos together on the battlefiel­d? What would it have looked like, rather, to have these women finish off the villain as the boys stood aside? How would it have landed if Wanda had a handle on her powers and their developmen­t didn’t come down to a choice between a hero’s work and domestic bliss? Whenever I see a female hero, I wonder what conditions will be tagged to her power. I wonder how, even without the male capesters who dominate the genre, she will be shaped by traditiona­l gender notions that support images of masculine, fightready leading men.

In so many ways, “WandaVisio­n” was a delightful surprise from the MCU and the first time since the Scarlet Witch was introduced that I felt the franchise rewarded my excitement for the narrative possibilit­ies of this female hero. And yet it doesn’t leave me fully sated. I think of the long list of Marvel movies dating back to “Iron Man,”from2008,andI want more: messy women, strong women, women who are powerful and independen­t from the society of men. Women who deliver the last knockout punch.

 ?? Disney+ ?? Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen) and Vision (Paul Bettany) seem to be living a happy suburban life in “WandaVisio­n.” But is it real?
Disney+ Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen) and Vision (Paul Bettany) seem to be living a happy suburban life in “WandaVisio­n.” But is it real?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States