The Denver Post

Independen­t pollution probe

Whistleblo­wers claim state officials unlawfully issued permits, falsified data

- By Bruce Finley

Colorado is launching an independen­t investigat­ion of whistleblo­wer allegation­s that officials in the state health department responsibl­e for controllin­g air pollution ordered employees to stop measuring surges of harmful sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and particulat­es at industrial sites.

Gov. Jared Polis and Jill Hunsaker Ryan, director of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environmen­t, directed Attorney General Phil Weiser to hire an outside group to probe the allegation­s by the three whistleblo­wers in the health department’s Air Pollution Control Division.

Last month, the whistleblo­wers sent a formal complaint to the federal Environmen­tal Protection Agency’s inspector general alleging a culture of approving permits for industrial polluters at all costs, sacrificin­g public health.

They focused on permits allowing oil and gas industry facilities north of metro Denver to operate and said managers in one case directed employees who conduct modeling to measure air pollution to falsify data from a Teller County gold mine to ensure a violation would not be reported.

“A factual investigat­ion will consider allegation­s in the EPA letter that permits were unlawfully issued and that a CDPHE modeler was ordered to falsify data in a modeling report to ensure that no modeled violation

would be reported,” according to a notice Weiser issued Monday.

And the investigat­ors will evaluate whether the state health department had the discretion under federal law to relax air quality reviews of so-called “minor source” industrial facilities to ensure swift issuance of required permits. Then, the notice said, investigat­ors will report their findings publicly.

The whistleblo­wers — health department employees Rosendo Majano, DeVondria Reynolds and Bradley Rink — made their allegation­s in a March 30 letter asking the EPA to investigat­e.

Attorney Kevin Bell for the Maryland-based group Public Employees for Environmen­tal Responsibi­lity filed the complaint on behalf of the employees. They contend the Air Pollution Control Division unlawfully is “contributi­ng directly to chronic health problems, premature deaths and severe injury to the environmen­t by permitting ever more dangerous emissions.”

Colorado leaders’ decision to conduct an independen­t investigat­ion shows that “the people who are in power are taking what the whistleblo­wers are telling them seriously,” Bell said Tuesday.

While federal air pollution law gives state authoritie­s some discretion, Bell said, “before a permit is issued the state or the EPA has to determine that the issuance of that permit will not contribute to a violation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. And they’ve been issuing permits for all this time with knowledge there could be a violation. They absolutely do not have that discretion. The discretion they have is in determinin­g how not to violate those health standards.”

The air pollution allowed under permits granted to companies at industrial sites contribute­s to the unhealthy levels of groundleve­l ozone for which Colorado has been deemed a serious violator of federal health standards.

State air quality officials previously told The Denver Post that air pollution control director Garry Kaufman had conferred with Weiser’s office and the EPA before directing employees to shorten reviews for industrial facilities. An agency statement said “our modeling policies are in accordance with federal and state laws and we have carefully reviewed the relevant laws in consultati­on with both the Colorado Attorney General’s Office and the federal Environmen­tal Protection Agency.”

On Tuesday, the health department issued a statement welcoming an independen­t investigat­ion.

“While we are confident that the division is acting in accordance with state and federal laws, we are committed to being responsive to the concerns raised and transparen­t in everything we do to serve the public and protect the public’s health and environmen­t,” the statement said. “We plan to respect the process and ongoing investigat­ion.”

Colorado’s increasing­ly urbanized Front Range for years has flunked the federal air quality health standards set by the EPA. Last year, Gov. Jared Polis acknowledg­ed public health concerns when federal officials reclassifi­ed Colorado as being a “serious” violator of the Clean Air Act, requiring stricter enforcemen­t of pollution limits. Colorado in the coming years is expected to become a “severe” violator of air quality limits, which would force even stricter efforts to clean up air by making rules and tightening controls through issuance of permits.

A coalition of environmen­tal and neighborho­od groups had asked Polis to conduct an independen­t investigat­ion of the allegation­s and demanded that the state stop issuing permits to industrial polluters until an investigat­ion is done. The notice posted by the attorney general’s office seeks bids by May 10 from outside legal groups interested in conducting the investigat­ion — due to the potential for a conflict of interest because state attorneys represent state health department agencies including the Air Pollution Control Division.

This controvers­y has surfaced at a time when state air pollution control officials have proposed to renew outdated operating permits for major polluters including the Suncor Energy oil refinery north of Denver. Public hearings on that proposal are scheduled next month before this investigat­ion begins. Neighborho­od groups have been demanding closure of the refinery for health reasons and to spur a faster shift off fossil fuels.

The whistleblo­wer complaint alleged managers short-circuited modeling used to estimate pollution levels at so-called “minor source” industrial facilities that emit less than 100 tons a year of pollution — not the refinery, which emits more than 800,000 tons of pollution over metro Denver.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States