The Denver Post

This is how theocracy shrivels

- By David Brooks © The New York Times Co.

Certain years leap out as turning points in world history: 1517, 1776 and 1917. These are years when powerful ideas strode onto the world stage: the Reformatio­n, democratic capitalism and revolution­ary Communism.

The period around 1979 was another such dawn. Political Islam burst onto global consciousn­ess with the Iranian revolution, the rise of the mujahedeen after the Soviet invasion of Afghanista­n, the Islamizati­on program in Pakistan and the popularity of the Muslim Brotherhoo­d across the Arab world.

The ideas that seized the imaginatio­n of millions had deep and diverse intellectu­al roots.

For example, mid-20th century thinker Sayyid Qutb mounted a comprehens­ive critique of the soulless materialis­m of America, tracing it in part to the separation of church and state — the fatal error, he believed, that divided the spirit from the flesh. In the Muslim world, he argued, body and soul should not be split asunder, but should live united in a resurrecte­d caliphate, governed by Shariah law.

This vision could manifest in more temperate ways, as clerics seeking to exercise political power, or in more violent ways, as jihadis trying to overthrow Arab regimes.

By 2006, in an essay called “The Master Plan,” Lawrence Wright could report in The New Yorker how al-qaida had operationa­lized these dreams into a set of sweeping, violent strategies.

The plans were epic in scope: expel the U.S. from Iraq, establish a caliphate, overthrow Arab regimes, initiate a clash with Israel, undermine Western economies, create “total confrontat­ion” between believers and nonbelieve­rs, and achieve “definitive victory” by 2020, transformi­ng world history.

To the terrorists behind Thursday’s bombing outside the Kabul airport, the murder of more than a dozen Americans and scores of Afghans may seem like a step toward that utopia. The humbling U.S. withdrawal from Afghanista­n may to them seem like a catastroph­ic defeat for Western democracy and a great leap toward the dream of a unified Muslim community.

But something has changed over the past several years. The magnetic ideas at the heart of so many of these movements have lost their luster.

If extremists thought they could mobilize Muslim opinion through acts of clarifying violence, they have failed. Across 11 lands in which Pew surveyed Muslims in 2013, a median of only 13% had a favorable opinion of al-qaida.

In his 2011 book, “The Missing Martyrs,” Charles Kurzman showed that fewer than 1 in every 100,000 Muslims had become an Islamist terrorist in the years since 9/11. The vast majority rejected the enterprise.

When political Islamists tried to establish theocratic­ally influenced rule in actual nations, their movement’s reputation was badly hurt. In one of extremism’s most violent, radical manifestat­ions, the Islamic State’s caliphate in Iraq and Syria became a blood-drenched nightmare.

But even in more moderate places, political Islam is losing favor. In 2019, The Economist surveyed the data and concluded, “Across the Arab world people are turning against religious political parties and the clerics who helped bring them to power. Many appear to be giving up on Islam, too.” Ayatollah Mohammad Taqi Mesbah Yazdi of Iran noticed the trend in his own country: “Iranians are evading religious teachings and turning to secularism.” Globally, terrorism is down.

In this humiliatin­g month, as the Taliban takes power in Afghanista­n and ISIS still spreads mayhem, it’s obvious that even local conflicts can create incredible danger.

But the idea of global glory — a fundamenta­l shaking of the world order — that burst on the world stage roughly 40 years ago has been brought low.

We blundered when we sought to defeat a powerful idea through some decisive military victory. But much is achieved when we keep up the pressure, guard the homeland, promote liberal ideas and allow theocracy to shrivel under the weight of its own flaws. The men and women, in and out of uniform, who have done this work over the past 40 years, and are still giving their lives to it, deserve our gratitude and admiration.

 ??  ?? David Brooks became an Op-ed columnist for The New York Times in September 2003.
David Brooks became an Op-ed columnist for The New York Times in September 2003.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States