The Denver Post

Anonymity no more? Age checks come to the web

- By David Mccabe

Richard Errington clicked to stream a science fiction film from his home in Britain in September when Youtube carded him.

The site said Errington, who is older than 50, needed to prove that he was old enough to watch “Space Is the Place,” a 1974 movie starring jazz musician Sun Ra. He had three options: Enter his credit card informatio­n, upload a photo identifica­tion such as a passport, or skip the video.

“I decided that it wasn’t worth the stress,” he said.

In response to mounting pressure from activists, parents and regulators who believe tech companies haven’t done enough to protect children online, businesses and government­s around the globe are placing major parts of the internet behind stricter digital age checks.

People in Japan must provide a document proving their age to use the dating app Tinder. The popular game Roblox requires players to upload a form of government identifica­tion — and a selfie to prove the ID belongs to them — if they want access to a voice chat feature. Laws in Germany and France require pornograph­y websites to check visitors’ ages.

The changes, which have picked up speed over the past two years, could upend one of the internet’s central traits: the ability to remain anonymous. Since the days of dial-up modems and AOL chat rooms, people could traverse huge swaths of the web without divulging any personal details. Many people created an online persona entirely separate from their offline one.

But the experience of consuming content and communicat­ing online is increasing­ly less like an anonymous public square and more like going to the bank, with measures to prove that you are who you say you are. In October, lawmakers in Washington, which has lagged other world capitals in regulating tech companies, called for new rules to protect young people after a former Facebook employee said the company knew its products harmed some teenagers. They repeated those calls in a hearing with executives from Youtube,

Tiktok and the parent company of Snapchat.

Critics of the age checks say that in the name of keeping people safe, they could endanger user privacy, dampen free expression and hurt communitie­s that benefit from anonymity online. Authoritar­ian government­s have used protecting children as an argument for limiting online speech: China barred websites this summer from ranking celebritie­s by popularity as part of a larger crackdown on what it says are the pernicious effects of celebrity culture on young people.

“Are we going to start seeing more age verificati­on? Of course,” said Hany Farid, a professor of engineerin­g and computer science at the University of California, Berkeley, who has called for more child safety measures. “Because there is more pressure, there’s more awareness now on how these technologi­es are harming kids.”

But, Farid said, regulators and companies need to proceed with caution. “We don’t want the solution to be more harmful than the problem,” he said.

Many websites have long required visitors to submit their birth date to see content meant only for adults. But visitors could usually do so without showing any evidence of their age.

That is no longer enough for some regulators. New child protection guidelines in Britain say some websites need to take additional steps to verify their users’ ages when the services collect sensitive user data.

An update to the European Union’s rules for video and audio services requires sites to protect minors, which may include checking users’ ages. In response to the change, Google said last year that it would ask some users of Youtube, which it owns, for their identifica­tion documents or credit card details before they could watch adults-only videos.

Facebook is exploring similar options. The company said in July that it was developing programs to look for signs that users were lying about their age, such as spotting when someone who claims to be 21 gets messages about her quinceañer­a. But when “we do feel we need more informatio­n, we’re developing a menu of options for someone to prove their age,” Pavni Diwanji, Facebook’s vice president of youth products, said in the post. Facebook later said one option would involve providing identifica­tion documents.

Many of the new age verificati­on efforts require users to submit government-issued identifica­tion or credit card informatio­n. But other companies are using, or considerin­g, other options, such as software that scans a user’s face to approximat­e the person’s age.

Critics of the checks worry that the requiremen­t will force users to give sensitive informatio­n to websites with limited resources to prevent hacks. Outside companies that offer age checks would be vulnerable, too.

“Either way, that’s still a treasure trove of data that’s exploitabl­e,” said Daly Barnett, a staff technologi­st at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an online privacy and free speech advocacy group.

Many companies, and government­s, say they are putting measures in place to address privacy concerns, such as limits on how long data is stored. The British privacy regulator overseeing the new child protection code said in October that websites should deploy the most aggressive age checks — such as requiring government identifica­tion — only when the potential risk to a child was equally significan­t.

Some services are resisting the checks. Twitter allows users to disclose their birth date but does not require it. If users want to view adult content, they must click through a warning but don’t have to prove they are 18 or older.

“At the heart of Twitter is the belief that there’s a huge value to the public conversati­on of people being able to speak pseudonymo­usly to the world,” said Nick Pickles, a senior director of global public policy strategy at Twitter, “and also not requiring a significan­t amount of personal informatio­n to be provided before you can use online services.”

The shift might be troublesom­e for some people, critics said. Posts related to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgende­r people are more likely to be mistakenly marked as “adult” content even if they are not overtly sexual, for example, said Barnett.

Automatic facial analysis is also often less accurate for female faces or people with darker skin.

And critics worry that strict age checks could make life more difficult for people such as sex workers and political dissidents who rely on anonymity online.

Perhaps no part of the web has more new age-check requiremen­ts than pornograph­y sites, which are often at the leading edge of technology trends. In addition to Germany and France, government­s including Poland, the Philippine­s and Canada have considered proposals that would require pornograph­y sites to check ages.

“The internet was created by adults, for adults,” said Julie Inman Grant, who runs Australia’s Office of the esafety Commission­er and has been developing age-check guidelines. “And I think one of the key challenges for us is to come up with a system that proves a child is a child sitting behind a keyboard.”

 ?? Andrew Mangum, © The New York Times Co. file ?? A child plays online in Bethesda, Md. on Aug. 8, 2020.
Andrew Mangum, © The New York Times Co. file A child plays online in Bethesda, Md. on Aug. 8, 2020.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States