The Denver Post

Humane Clothing Act passes with latest batch of results

- By Deborah Swearingen Daily Camera

Boulder will now ban the sale and manufactur­e of new fur products, the latest election update from the Boulder County clerk’s office confirmed.

The Humane Clothing Act, which initially had been too close to call, hung on to its lead, passing with 51% of the vote.

Formally known as Ballot Question 301 and informally as Fur Free Boulder, the measure makes it unlawful to “manufactur­e, sell, display for sale, distribute or trade for monetary or nonmonetar­y considerat­ion any fur or fur product” in Boulder.

“Boulder is leading the way in making a more compassion­ate world for animals,” campaign organizer Brent Johannes said in a statement. “This historic act will usher in a new wave of animal rights legislatio­n, and we hope to soon see a statewide ban considered.” Although it bans the manufactur­e and sale of fur products, the measure includes some exemptions. For example, the ballot language states it would not apply to used or secondhand products, nor would it apply to animal products other than fur, such as leather or wool.

Additional­ly, it excludes fur items that are used for sacred or religious purposes in Indigenous cultures, namely those that fall under the American Indian Religious Freedom Act and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriati­on Act.

Fur Free Boulder organizers believe the measure will have minimal impact on local businesses and view the measure largely as a symbolic one. They hope its success will inspire other cities and towns or the state as a whole.

“This is further evidence that ordinary people want to see animals protected, not abused,” Johannes said.

However, some small businesses say the suggestion that the measure won’t impact them is false, and they worry the measure may have unintended consequenc­es.

Laurel Tate’s business survived the 2008 financial crisis and the ongoing pandemic. Now, she is worried Ballot Question 301’s success will have a negative economic impact on her downtown boutique.

Two Sole Sisters, the shop Tate co-owns with her sister, carriessom­e products with fur, including hats with fur pompoms and fur-lined gloves, as well as some more ambiguous products made with other natural fibers.

“This is how I pay my mortgage,” she said. “It’s very, very frustratin­g and dishearten­ing.”

Tate said she is in a holding pattern right now, waiting to hear more from the city about how it intends to enforce the measure.

“I’m curious how the city is going to interpret the measure and how they are going to roll out the measure in a legal way,” she said.

Currently, the Humane Clothing Act is set to go into effect on Jan. 1. However, Tate said there is precedent for an injunction that would allow an extension so local retailers such as herself can sell the merchandis­e they already have in stock.

Initially, the Boulder Chamber didn’t take an official position on the measure.

However, it later decided to oppose it, expressing concerns about unintended impacts on local retailers that carry products such as shoes, boots and hats that incorporat­e certain natural fibers. Now that the measure has passed, the chamber is planning a webinar for businesses looking for clarificat­ion and to avoid unnecessar­y impacts from the measure.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States