The Denver Post

Sexual harassment is rampant, report shows

- By Yan Zhuang

MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA» Men strutting down corridors looking women up and down. Women carrying fake binders to block unwanted advances. Forcible touches, kisses, comments about appearance. Fears of speaking out.

A sweeping review of the workplace culture in Australia’s Parliament paints a damning picture of widespread sexual harassment, with employees sharing harrowing stories of an alcohol-soaked atmosphere where powerful men blurred lines and crossed boundaries with impunity.

The report, released Tuesday, was commission­ed by the Australian government in March, shortly after a former employee’s account of being raped in Parliament House sent shock waves through Australia’s halls of power. It found that one-third of parliament­ary employees — 40% of women — had experience­d sexual harassment. About 1% of the more than 1,700 people who participat­ed in the review said they had been the victim of attempted or actual sexual assault.

In response, Australia’s sex discrimina­tion commission­er, Kate Jenkins, who conducted the study, proposed a series of measures to address the power imbalances, gender inequality and lack of accountabi­lity that she said had made Parliament a hostile workplace for many employees, especially young female staff members.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison called the findings of rampant sexual harassment “appalling” and added, “I wish I found them more surprising.” He said the government would review the report’s recommenda­tions — including the creation of an independen­t central complaints body, a code of conduct and alcohol policies — but did not commit to accepting them.

The Australian Parliament has long had a reputation as a testostero­ne-fueled bunker, a place that lagged behind the rest of society as the country’s corporatio­ns and other institutio­ns made gradual moves toward gender equality. In the past 20 years, Australia has fallen from 15th to 50th in the world for parliament­ary gender diversity.

After Brittany Higgins, a former parliament­ary staff member, said early this year that she had been raped by a more senior colleague in the defense minister’s office, thousands of women marched in cities across Australia to demand change.

Women in politics who had never felt they had an outlet to share their experience­s have come forward with accounts of the misogyny and sexual assault and harassment they endured: stories of being groped, demeaned, insulted, ignored, interrupte­d. Several federal female lawmakers have quit in recent years, in part because of the disrespect and abuse.

The new report tried to both put numbers on the breadth of the problems in Australian politics and add, in sometimes

painful detail, to the stories that have emerged. Among the comments that participan­ts shared anonymousl­y with investigat­ors:

• “The M.P. sitting beside me leaned over. Also thinking he wanted to tell me something, I leaned in. He grabbed me and stuck his tongue down my throat. The others all laughed. It was revolting and humiliatin­g.”

• “Aspiring male politician­s who thought nothing of, in one case, picking you up, kissing you on the lips, lifting you up, touching you, pats on the bottom, comments about appearance, you know, the usual.”

• “It is a man’s world and you are reminded of it every day thanks to the looks up and down you get, to the representa­tion in the parliament­ary chambers, to the preferenti­al treatment politician­s give senior male journalist­s.”

• “I thought it was normal to tell people that they should avoid certain people at events. I thought it was normal to tell people how to take alcohol to remain safe. Now that I look back on it, that is insane.”

• “I do often describe Parliament House as the most sexist place I’ve worked. I guess there is a workplace culture of drinking. There’s not a lot of accountabi­lity. The boys are lads. And that behavior is celebrated.”

• “Young women, particular­ly media advisers coming in, particular­ly the younger women coming in, were like fresh meat and challenges.”

The report describes a toxic work culture driven by power imbalances between members of Parliament and their staffs. In this pressure-cooker environmen­t, sexual harassment was normalized and offenders acted with impunity because there were few avenues for recourse, the review says.

“Parliament is inherently about power, and that power runs in multiple directions,” Jenkins said at a news conference shortly after the review was released. “We heard that power imbalances and the misuse of power is one of the primary drivers of bullying, sexual harassment and sexual assault.”

The “fly in, fly out” nature of Parliament — most lawmakers and staff members do not live in the nation’s capital, Canberra, and stay there only during the weeks when it is in session — created a sense of isolation, the report said.

One person interviewe­d for the report likened the culture to high schoolers at camp: “There’s a bunch of naughty schoolboys on a school trip, and they think everyone’s fair game, and whatever happens in Canberra stays in Canberra, and it’s a kind of free-for-all.”

Unable to go home when Parliament was sitting, “many people preferred to stay late at work or to drink with their colleagues, heightenin­g the risk of misconduct,” the review found.

Alcohol was sometimes present during parliament­ary business. “Members of Parliament have gone onto the floor of Parliament to vote under the influence of alcohol,” one submission to the review said. And at night, drinking was a key feature of networking and socializin­g events.

A workplace environmen­t characteri­zed by “intense loyalty, the prioritiza­tion of ‘optics’ and, in political offices, intense media scrutiny and public interest,” discourage­d staffers from speaking out. Doing so could be risky, they said.

Susan Harris Rimmer, a law professor at Griffith University who is a former parliament­ary staff member, called the report’s findings “a shameful picture but an accurate picture.”

The review shows that Parliament has “not been a safe workplace for women or any minority,” she said, “and that there was no recourse; bad behavior was seemingly unable to be regulated.”

The report’s recommenda­tions are similar to those put in place in Britain, the United States and Canada in years past, and implemente­d across Australian workplaces 20 years ago, Rimmer said. Calls for basic reforms found in other democratic legislatur­es, such as a complaint system independen­t of the major parties, have been ignored for years.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States