You can’t compare Trump’s record to Bidenomics

Let’s talk about political theater for a moment.

Last fall a House subcommittee held a hearing to discuss the impact of one of President Joe Biden’s key pieces of legislation: the Inflation Reduction Act. Predictably, Republicans hated it. They were particularly peeved about the clean-energy tax incentives. Rep. Glenn Grothman, Rwis., framed his criticism around a populist message.

“Some of these green cars, electric cars can cost $100,000 a year, and so almost by definition the really wealthy showoffs of our society are the people building them,” he said, before asking a witness: “You mean they give special credits to the rich guy who likes to show off with his $100,000-a-year Chevy but you don’t get a credit if you’re an average guy trying to buy a car for $35,000?”

Grothman’s Norma Rae impersonation was so convincing you almost forget he is the same politician who was once cornered by hundreds of pro-union protesters as they yelled, “Shame, shame, shame!” because his policies were so harmful to the “average guy.” His stunt last fall was bold political theater.

As was the answer that came from the witness, Preston Brashers, a research fellow at the Heritage Foundation. That is the same think tank that is reportedly guiding the policies that a future Trump administration would enact should the former president be elected in November. Brashers, who once bafflingly accused the Biden administration of plundering the American people, lamented the lack of affordability of green-ticket items such as solar panels.

Hold on, now. We all get that many Americans were feeling pinched financially last year. But this brain trust wants us to believe the stress at the grocery checkout line was caused by one year of Biden’s inflation policy? After Trump spent four years pillaging the economy to serve the rich? Corporate tax receipts under Trump fell to an almost 75year low.

We can have a discussion about fiscal policy without pretending our problems are all Biden’s fault.

We can have a discussion about spending without vilifying Republicans.

But there’s no longer room for debate about Trump’s ability to handle the economy. That’s done.

Even before he first ran for president, Trump led businesses into bankruptcy six times. (He explained that away as shrewd business.) Trump ballooned the deficit by $7.8 trillion — and $3.3 trillion of that was before COVID-19 hit the U.S. and necessitated vast stimulus programs.

It’s all theater.

And yet for Trump, the show is not over. In some ways it is just beginning, and the next act does not look good for him.

Because as someone whose entire image has been based on wealth and power, he has to be suffering now that so many more Americans know for certain that he inflated his wealth by billions of dollars.

We need to talk about the economy: Last June, the Congressional Budget Office estimated in its 30-year outlook that publicly held debt will be equal to a record 181% of American economic activity by 2053. But anyone who pretends Trump is a proven expert on financial matters instantly will lose as much credibility as the former president has. His record is clear: Trump’s policies wrecked the federal government’s finances much as they have run his businesses into the ground.

Trump’s record as a public official: When he left office, he had grown the federal deficit by $23,500 per person. Just the 2017 tax cuts for corporations and wealthy Americans dug the nation $2 trillion deeper into debt.

Trump’s record as a businessman: He has now been exposed as having lied about his success. That’s not an opinion; it’s a finding proved in court. Just in the past two months, he has lost court cases with price tags adding up to nearly $600 million.

We can debate Biden’s record vs. Trump’s on most anything else: public health, immigration, you name it.

But pretending as if the former president should be given the keys to our economy is beyond the limits of political theater. It’s dangerous.