The Denver Post

The downsides of multitaski­ng

How to focus on one thing at a time

-

As you would probably expect, the potential harm varies depending on the activity and how adept you are at doing it. But, generally, “when we switch between tasks, we pay what’s been dubbed a ‘switch cost,’” Wagner said. “We’re going to be slower and less accurate than we would have been if we stayed on a single task.”

Speed and precision aren’t the only risks, either. Multitaski­ng is more cognitivel­y demanding, even when we’re doing things we find enjoyable or easy. When we multitask, we can tax our working memory, or our ability to hold and handle informatio­n in our mind, Byers explained. “The more we overload that system and the more we’re trying to keep in our brains at once, the more mental fatigue it can lead to,” she said. And other studies have found that multitaski­ng can set our heart racing, raise our blood pressure, trigger anxiety, dampen our mood and negatively impact our

Mark suggested you start by observing yourself throughout the day, noticing when and how you task-switch without realizing it. From there, the advice is simple yet challengin­g: You’ll need to practice monotaskin­g, or doing one thing at a time, to gradually retrain your focus and build your tolerance.

Monotaskin­g might be easiest during times when you mentally perform best, Mark said. It differs from person to person, but in one workplace study, she and her colleagues found that most people’s ability to tackle challengin­g work peaked around midmorning and midafterno­on.

If you’re struggling, start small. Can you monotask for five minutes? How about 10? “When it comes to our brains, slow and steady is always a good strategy,” Byers said.

Your life is probably going to include some level of task-switching, but there are ways to be more intentiona­l about it.

Stick to your strengths. Certain activities “strain our systems and drain our brain power more or less than others,” Byers said. So if a task is stressful or requires a lot of mental effort when doing it solo, you probably won’t be better off multitaski­ng. For example, you might be good at crocheting while watching TV, but a beginner might need full concentrat­ion to avoid skipping stitches.

• Weigh the risks. Some tasks might feel like second nature, but there are still times when you want your wits about you. “Even if we feel able to do something without paying much attention, we cannot predict the unpredicta­ble nature of the world,” Wagner said. “Highly skilled drivers can’t anticipate when a car will swerve into your lane.”

The stakes don’t have to be life or death for multitaski­ng to be not worth it: It can leave the door open for serious mistakes at work or stop you from being as present as you want to be at home.

• Find break points. When and how we switch tasks matters, too. Rather than pivoting at the drop of a distractio­n, Mark suggested swapping at what she called “break points,” places in your work flow where it will be “easy to pick it up again without having to do redundant work.” As you read this article you might try getting to the end before checking your notificati­ons. If that’s not possible, you might aim for at least the end of this paragraph.

• Use multitaski­ng when it actually helps. Stacking habits, particular­ly activities you like with ones you don’t, can give your brain more positive reinforcem­ent than monotaskin­g alone. If, for instance, you’re more likely to do the dishes with the TV on, it’s probably worth sacrificin­g a bit of attention. “Our brains may not like change,” Byers said. “But they do really like rewards.”

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States