The Denver Post

A “grave counterint­elligence threat” aided Trump in 2016 — he wants him back

- By Lynn Schmidt Columnist Lynn Schmidt is a member of the St. Louis Postdispat­ch editorial board.

Americans’ collective judgment is so clouded by hyperparti­san lenses that we are missing a potential national security threat right before our very eyes.

Former President Donald Trump is apparently considerin­g reenlistin­g someone onto his campaign whom the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee once dubbed “a grave counterint­elligence threat” because of ties to a Russian oligarch.

On March 18, The Washington Post’s Josh Dawsey reported, “Four people close to Trump said he was expected to hire (Paul) Manafort as a campaign adviser later this year, with potential jobs centering on the Republican National Convention and/or fundraisin­g.”

The following thread is only a partial list of the actions and history of Paul Manafort.

John Newhouse wrote in Foreign Affairs magazine that beginning in May 2002, Ukraine was making it clear that membership in NATO was one of its principal goals. “Later, in 2005, a staff member at the National Security Council called (Sen. John) Mccain’s office, which itself was pushing for Ukraine’s acceptance into NATO, to complain that Davis, Manafort, Freedman’s lobbying was undercutti­ng U.S. foreign policy in Ukraine.” Davis, Manafort, Freedman was Manafort’s lobbying firm.

He continued his work as a lobbyist in the 2000s. Trump hired Manafort as his unpaid campaign manager from March until August 2016. Trump asked Manafort to resign after The Associated Press revealed that Manafort had orchestrat­ed a covert Washington lobbying operation until 2014 on behalf of Ukraine’s ruling pro-russian political party and was being investigat­ed by the FBI.

During the 2016 campaign, Manafort allegedly shared Trump campaign polling data with Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian citizen who the U.S. government said had ties to Russian intelligen­ce.

In 2017, The Associated Press reported on a 2005 strategy memo that Manafort secretly worked for a Russian billionair­e with a plan to “greatly benefit the Putin Government.”

In 2018, as a result of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion into Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 elections — interferen­ce the investigat­ion concluded was “sweeping and systemic” — Manafort was found guilty of hiding millions of dollars he had made lobbying on behalf of prorussian Ukrainian politician­s in overseas bank accounts and then falsifying his finances to get loans.

In August 2020, the bipartisan U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligen­ce released its report on Russian Active Measures, Campaigns, and Interferen­ce in the 2016 U.S. Election. The committee’s acting chairman at the time was Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida. Here are a few of the takeaways from the heavily redacted report regarding Manafort:

“The Committee found that Manafort’s presence on the Campaign and proximity to Trump created opportunit­ies for the Russian intelligen­ce services to exert influence over, and acquire confidenti­al informatio­n on, the Trump Campaign.”

“The Committee assesses that (Russian intelligen­ce officer Konstantin) Kilimnik likely served as a channel to Manafort for Russian intelligen­ce services, and that those services likely sought to exploit Manafort’s access to gain insight into the Campaign.”

“Beginning while he was Campaign chairman and continuing until at least 2018, Manafort discussed with Kilimnik a peace plan for eastern Ukraine that benefited the Kremlin.”

“Taken as a whole, Manafort’s high-level access and willingnes­s to share informatio­n with individual­s closely affiliated with the Russian intelligen­ce services ... represente­d a grave counterint­elligence threat.”

After losing the 2020 election, Trump pardoned Manafort in December of that year.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán recently met with Trump at Mar-a-lago. After the meeting, Orbán told Hungarian state media that Trump had told him he would “not give a penny in the Ukraine-russia war ... Therefore, the war will end, because it is obvious that Ukraine cannot stand on its own feet.”

Now, apparently, Trump is considerin­g bringing back Manafort as a close adviser to the campaign. This is happening against the backdrop of Trump potentiall­y receiving intelligen­ce briefings again as a major-party nominee.

While the following quote from the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee report speaks to the 2020 election, it could and should easily apply to 2024:

“Indeed, Russia is actively interferin­g again in the 2020 U.S. election to assist Donald Trump, and some of the President’s associates are amplifying those efforts. It is vitally important that the country be ready.”

To be ready again in 2024, Americans need to be clear on the threats at hand by viewing them through fully opened, undarkened, and nonpartisa­n eyes.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States