The Guardian (USA)

The government's plans to cut student fees threaten life-changing research

-

Everywhere you go, your life is improved by breakthrou­ghs developed in the labs and classrooms of UK universiti­es. Treatments for diabetes and Parkinson’s, methods used by the police to cut violent crime, the sugar tax – even digital theology that can tackle online trolling. All of these are the work of UK academics, because the UK is a research powerhouse.

The stats bear this out: more than 80% of the research coming out of the 24 research-intensive Russell Group universiti­es is classed as world-leading or internatio­nally excellent. This brings knowledge, but also influence. The rest of the world wants to work with the UK on the latest discoverie­s and on shared challenges, from climate change to the data revolution. After Brexit, this will be crucial.

Luckily, research and developmen­t now sits at the heart of the government’s industrial strategy, which aims to put the UK at the forefront of cutting-edge industries of the future, including clean technology and artificial intelligen­ce.

Yet there is inconsiste­ncy in Whitehall’s approach. While the left arm of government is urging universiti­es to prioritise essential R&D, the right arm is making plans that could put the future of university research at risk.

A review of the funding of post-18 education, commission­ed by the prime minister, is currently underway. The widely anticipate­d outcome is a cut in tuition fees. As you might expect, this has prompted some debate on the possible consequenc­es for teaching, staff redundanci­es and course closures. Some universiti­es may even be forced over the brink and student places will be limited.

Less discussed – but also important – is the potential impact of a funding cut on research. Right now, the cost of teaching UK students breaks roughly even, through tuition fees and some government top-up. Research, however, is underfunde­d, with research councils covering just 72% of actual costs and universiti­es making up the rest through other means, such as philanthro­pic donations and internatio­nal student fees.

If a cut to tuition fees leaves big holes in teaching budgets, it’s easy to see how universiti­es could redirect funding from research. As a result, vital R&D would have to be scaled back, to the detriment of the NHS, British industry and UK citizens.

This would be a remarkable own goal. More than half of business investment in R&D in this country comes from overseas companies moving here to work with our world-class universiti­es. Take AstraZenec­a, which is moving its global headquarte­rs to Cambridge to be next to the university. If the research generated by our universiti­es goes into decline, these companies will go elsewhere, taking their vital investment with them.

This matters to the future of our economy because innovation underpinne­d by R&D drives growth in industrial­ised countries, according to Nobel prize winner Robert Solow. This is perhaps exemplifie­d by the trajectory of South Korea, which in the 1960s was roughly as wealthy as Bolivia. Today it is the 11th biggest economy in the world, powered by high-tech exports and homegrown companies including Samsung, Hyundai and LG Electronic­s. It is no coincidenc­e South Korea spends 4% of its GDP on R&D; by comparison the UK spends just 1.7%.

Some will say the way to plug future funding gaps is by recruiting more internatio­nal students who pay higher fees. But these students are not a cash cow. They enrich our learning and boost the UK’s global partnershi­ps, but we can’t expect them to prop up teaching and research budgets. In any case this wouldn’t be sustainabl­e: numbers fluctuate from year to year and there is intense and growing global competitio­n for internatio­nal students.

Instead, ministers need to ensure teaching and research are both properly supported. Let’s not see UK R&D become collateral damage in the current review of post-18 education. In these uncertain times let’s play to one of the UK’s greatest strengths. We are a giant in innovation, so let’s make the most of it. Protecting and enhancing research will bring countless more benefits to us all. Stephanie Smith is a senior research analyst at the Russell Group

 ??  ?? ‘Less discussed – but also important – is the potential impact of a funding cut on research.’ Photograph: Alamy
‘Less discussed – but also important – is the potential impact of a funding cut on research.’ Photograph: Alamy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States