The Guardian (USA)

University decries professor's 'vile' racism and sexism – but says it can't fire him

- Poppy Noor

An economics professor at Indiana University Bloomingto­n has published a number of extremely racist, homophobic and sexist tweets – and yet the university has put out a statement saying it cannot penalize or fire him for doing so.

“Professor Eric Rasmusen has, for many years, used his private social media accounts to disseminat­e his racist, sexist, and homophobic views,” read the statement from the university’s provost, Lauren Robel. “We cannot, nor would we, fire Professor Rasmusen for his posts as a private citizen, as vile and stupid as they are, because the first amendment of the United States constituti­on forbids us to do so. That is not a close call.”

Rasmusen’s tweets include an article retweeted on 7 November titled “Are women destroying academia? Probably”. Rasmusen quoted a comment from the article that focused on the intellectu­al superiorit­y of men: “Geniuses are overwhelmi­ngly male because they combine higher outlier IQ with moderately low agreeablen­ess and conscienti­ousness.”

Since outrage over his tweets began on Thursday night, Rasmusen has tweeted an article focusing on the economic benefits of slavery.

In 2003, he wrote a blogpost in which he claimed gay men are more likely to molest students; that they “are generally promiscuou­s”; and are not suited for “moral exemplar” profession­s such as teaching and preaching.

Reacting to complaints, the university decried Rasmusen’s bigoted stances and said it was bringing in a set of measures it claims will protect students who might be “reasonably be concerned that someone with Professor Rasmusen’s expressed prejudices and biases would not give them a fair shake in his classes”.

These include allowing students to opt out of Rasmusen’s classes; providing alternativ­e classes by other faculty members; requiring double-blind grading on all of Rasmusen’s students’ assignment­s; and having other staff check Rasmusen’s grading in cases where double-blind grading is not possible.

Rasmusen responded to what he called the “Twitter kerfuffle” by saying Robel has a “wrong view” on his opinions. In his statement, he defended calling women “sluts” with the line: “Is ‘slut’ a slur against women? Not at all. It is a slur against certain women, against a minority of women, and for them it is a justified slur, a descriptiv­e one.”

Rasmusen also quoted his pastor, who allegedly once said to him: “Eric, I want you to be persecuted, but I want you to be persecuted for being a Christian, too, and not just for being a conservati­ve.”

The university statement said: “Sometimes Professor Rasmusen explains his views as animated by his Christian faith, although Christ was neither a bigot nor did he use slurs; indeed, he counseled avoiding judgments.”

The controvers­y doesn’t seem to have upset Rasmusen, who claims it has been good for his Twitter following: “The number of my Twitter followers has risen from less than 400 to 833 from November 18th to 21st.”

Rasmusen has also posted some encouragin­g emails to his website. One says: “Do not let the thought police shut you down. The leftwing media always tries to skew the truth. Keep fighting the fight for critical thinking!”

 ??  ?? Indiana University Bloomingto­n, where Eric Rasmusen works. The university provost said: ‘We cannot, nor would we, fire Professor Rasmusen for his posts as a private citizen.’ Photograph: Wikimedia Commons
Indiana University Bloomingto­n, where Eric Rasmusen works. The university provost said: ‘We cannot, nor would we, fire Professor Rasmusen for his posts as a private citizen.’ Photograph: Wikimedia Commons

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States