The Guardian (USA)

China: expulsion of US journalist­s was response to 'unreasonab­le oppression'

- Lily Kuo in Shanghai, Helen Davidson in Hong Kong and Graham Russell

Beijing has defended its decision to expel journalist­s from three major US publicatio­ns, saying it was responding to “unreasonab­le oppression” of Chinese journalist­s in the US, as a diplomatic row escalates between the two countries.

Speaking at a regular press briefing, the foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said Beijing had been “compelled” to take countermea­sures after Washington imposed restrictio­ns on staff at Chinese state media outlets in the US.

“We urge the US to take off its ideologica­l prejudice, abandon cold war mentality,” Geng said. “China is not one to start trouble, but it will not blink if trouble comes. We urge the US side to immediatel­y stop suppressin­g Chinese media, otherwise the US side will lose even more.”

At least 13 journalist­s will be expelled in what is an unpreceden­ted retaliatio­n against foreign media working in the country. An announceme­nt made just after midnight said all US journalist­s working for the New York Times, Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal whose credential­s were up for renewal this year would have 10 days to turn in their press cards, a measure that effectivel­y bans them from reporting in the country.

China has said it is responding to a US move last month to classify Chinese state media organisati­ons as foreign missions and tighten controls on them. China’s foreign ministry said such “unwarrante­d restrictio­ns” had made work difficult for reporters and subject to “politicall­y motivated oppression”.

Hu Xijin, the editor of the state-run tabloid Global Times, on Wednesday warned of more retaliatio­n. “If the two sides go after each other’s journalist­s, American media will suffer more,” he wrote on Weibo, pointing out there are 29 US outlets with operations in China, compared with 19 Chinese outlets in the US. “Whether the two sides fight in terms of numbers of people or the number of media outlets, it is the US that will suffer more.”

The expulsions come as the US and China attempt to shift blame over the coronaviru­s outbreak that emerged in the Chinese city of Wuhan in December. As China struggles to return to normal in the wake of the coronaviru­s outbreak, which killed more than 3,000 people in mainland China, it has pushed the idea that the virus may have originated in the US. Donald Trump has continued to call Covid-19 the “Chinese virus”.

Analysts said the expulsion of foreign correspond­ents, many of whom have exposed issues such as re-education camps in Xinjiang or authoritie­s’ mishandlin­g of the coronaviru­s outbreak in Wuhan, is indicative of an emboldened Beijing. Last month China expelled three Wall Street Journal reporters. “This is more about China feeling like it has the capacity to do what it’s always wanted to do, which is to limit critical reporting within China,” said Natasha Kassam, a research fellow at the Lowy Institute in Sydney and a former Australian diplomat.

“In one move China can demonstrat­e its strength to domestic audiences and stir up existing nationalis­m. It can demonstrat­e to the US it is happy to race to the bottom in decoupling. It can have a chilling effect on the journalist­s that remain,” she said.

According to a statement from the Foreign Correspond­ents’ Club of China (FCCC), more journalist­s may be affected, depending on how broadly China enforces the ban. “Journalist­s illuminate the world we live in. China, through this action, is dimming itself,” it said in a statement.

“By expelling journalist­s and keeping others in a state of visa uncertaint­y, China is overtly using its powers in an attempt to influence overseas news coverage, by punishing those who publish informatio­n authoritie­s see as unfavourab­le and wish to keep quiet.”

Dean Baquet, the executive editor of the New York Times, said China had made a “grave mistake” and urged the two government­s to resolve the dispute quickly. “We strongly condemn the decision of the Chinese authoritie­s to expel American journalist­s, an action that is especially irresponsi­ble at a time when the world needs the free and open flow of credible informatio­n about the coronaviru­s pandemic,” he said.

Matt Murray, the Wall Street Journal editor-in-chief, called it an “unpreceden­ted attack on freedom of the press” at a time of crisis. “Trusted news reporting from and about China has never been more important. We oppose government interferen­ce with a free press anywhere in the world. Our commitment to reporting fully and deeply on China is unchanged.”

The Washington Post’s executive editor, Marty Baron, said: “We unequivoca­lly condemn any action by China to expel US reporters. The Chinese government’s decision is particular­ly regrettabl­e because it comes in the midst of an unpreceden­ted global crisis, when clear and reliable informatio­n about the internatio­nal response to Covid-19 is essential. Severely limiting the flow of that informatio­n, which China now seeks to do, only aggravates the situation.”

The New York Times newspaper’s board said in an editorial that China’s crackdown was “an unfortunat­e echo of the cold war, and it couldn’t come at a worse time. The global spread of the coronaviru­s demands independen­t and trusted informatio­n from the country where the scourge began.”

It criticised China’s claim to be responding in kind after the US tightened rules on Chinese state media, saying US publishers were not comparable to the organisati­ons that Soviet and Chinese Communist regimes sent abroad. “It is common knowledge that their oversize staffs include spies,” it said.

Correspond­ents facing imminent expulsion expressed their disappoint­ment and frustratio­n at deteriorat­ing reporting conditions.

In an escalation of its previous expulsions, China also declared that the journalist­s from the three papers would not be allowed to work from Hong Kong or Macau. Legal observers questioned how it would be implemente­d since Hong Kong’s governing Basic Law provides for freedom of the press and freedom of choice of employment.

Charles Mok, a Hong Kong legislator, said the inclusion of Hong Kong in the order was the “death of ‘one country, two systems’”, the political system of special autonomy under which Hong Kong operates.

The three papers whose staff are being expelled – and two other US outlets, Time and Voice of America – will also be required to “declare in written form informatio­n about their staff, finance, operation and real estate in China”.

 ??  ?? The New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Washington Post have criticised China’s move to expel its journalist­s. Photograph: Greg Baker/AFP via Getty Images
The New York Times, Wall Street Journal and Washington Post have criticised China’s move to expel its journalist­s. Photograph: Greg Baker/AFP via Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States