The Guardian (USA)

Helen Mirren at 75: wild costumes, blazing performanc­es – and a spell as a rock banshee

- Michael Billington

Who is Helen Mirren? Looking back over her career, as she hits 75, it is tempting to see her as two separate people. First, there was the outspoken young classical actor who fiercely resisted objectific­ation, whether from newspapers (“Stratford’s very own sex queen” was a notorious Sunday Times headline) or TV chatshow hosts. Then came the mature Mirren with a gift for playing monarchs (Elizabeth I on TV, Elizabeth II on screen and stage), for picking up every award going, and for being a great dame associated with excellent causes. Among many, she is an ambassador for Women Internatio­nal.

Yet I see no great gulf between the two Mirrens. Having followed her career for 50 years, several things strike me. One is that she has always been a dedicated, highly skilled actor. Another is that she is a perennial mix of the nomadic and the majestic: you don’t get to play Cleopatra, as she did for the National Youth Theatre when she was 20, without some inbuilt imperiousn­ess.

Indeed, one of my few brief encounters with her took place around that time, when I went to a party hosted by one of her Youth Theatre contempora­ries. My abiding memory is of a self-possessed young woman who made many of the men at the party feel like boys (and I, for one, was five years older).

Where does that confidence come from? You could argue that it is partly genetic. It is well-known that she was born Helen Mironoff and that her paternal grandfathe­r was a Russian aristocrat who fought in the tsar’s army and who was negotiatin­g an arms deal in Britain when he and his family were stranded by the 1917 revolution.

One can make too much of this, but it is fascinatin­g how many of the great British actors have foreign ancestry. John Gielgud’s stockbroke­r father came from a Slav family and Peggy Ashcroft’s mother was part Danish, part GermanJewi­sh. I suspect, in Mirren’s case, that her bloodline is significan­t. It’s no accident that, when she was at the Royal Shakespear­e Company, Trevor Nunn referred to her as a “Russian princess”, or that one of her biggest TV hits was as the empress Catherine the Great.

Yet within the aristocrat­ic Mirren there has always been an adventurer up for any challenge. From 1967 to 71, she was a key member of the RSC, playing – among many other roles – Shakespear­e’s

Cressida and Ophelia, as well as Strindberg’s Miss Julie. With a clas

 ??  ?? Imperious … in Caligula in 1979. Photograph: Photos 12/Alamy
Imperious … in Caligula in 1979. Photograph: Photos 12/Alamy
 ??  ?? Self-destructiv­e … in David Hare’s Teeth ’n’ Smiles, 1975. Photograph: Dennis Hart/ Daily Mail/Rex/Shuttersto­ck
Self-destructiv­e … in David Hare’s Teeth ’n’ Smiles, 1975. Photograph: Dennis Hart/ Daily Mail/Rex/Shuttersto­ck

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States