The Guardian (USA)

'Beyond the pale': antics of Trump ambassador­s highlight crisis in US diplomacy

- Julian Borger in Washington

The US ambassador to Iceland, a dermatolog­ist and major Republican donor, reportedly became so paranoid about his security he asked to carry a gun and to be taken everywhere in an armoured car.

Despite the absence of particular security concerns, the embassy in Reykjavik advertised in the local press for bodyguards, to placate the ambassador, Jeffrey Ross Gunter.

Gunter’s alleged antics are not an isolated case. A record share of Donald Trump’s ambassador­ial appointmen­ts have been political, mostly rewards for big-money donors, and his nominees have frequently stood out for their lack of qualificat­ions or aptitude.

A report to be published on Tuesday by Senate Democrats on the current situation at the state department, titled Diplomacy in Crisis, said: “While it is true that every administra­tion has its share of questionab­le appointmen­ts, the Trump administra­tion’s choices have gone beyond the pale, jeopardizi­ng the department’s ability to safeguard our nation’s interests.”

Since being nominated May 2019, Gunter has proved so hard to work with he has gone through seven deputy chiefs of mission (DCMs), career diplomats who do most of the day-today management of the embassy. According to CBS News, he rejected his first deputy, who had spent months learning Icelandic, because he “didn’t like the look of him” at their introducto­ry meeting.

Gunter also reportedly refused to return to his post after attending a conference in Washington in February, arguing he could do the job remotely, and was only coaxed back to Reykjavik in May after a call from the secretary of state, Mike Pompeo.

The state department said that Gunter’s return was delayed by the

coronaviru­s pandemic.

CBS reported that Gunter was persuaded not to make a formal request for a gun permit to the Icelandic authoritie­s, who have very strict firearms laws.

Gunter did not immediatel­y respond to a request to comment, but after the CBS report, he issued a statement to the Icelandic press, saying: “Our focus at the US embassy remains where it has always been – on strengthen­ing the US-Icelandic bilateral relationsh­ip which brings so much benefit to both our great nations. I am honored to be leading our team during this successful period of US-Icelandic appreciati­on and respect.”

On the question of the ambassador’s preoccupat­ion with his personal security, a state department spokespers­on said: “Protection programs for our leadership are standard features at most US facilities around the world. We continue to have a very close working relationsh­ip with Icelandic authoritie­s on security and other matters.”

Gunter is far from being the only wealthy Trump-donor-turned-diplomat to stand out for their eccentrici­ties. The ambassador to the UK, Woody Johnson, a billionair­e Trump backer, has been investigat­ed by the state department office of the inspector general (before the inspector general was fired in May) for racist and sexist remarks.

Johnson is reported to have resisted holding Black History Month events in 2018, asking his aides whether he would be addressing “a whole bunch of black people”. He was also reported to have held a number of official functions at a men-only London club, White’s.

Johnson rejected the charges. He wrote on Twitter: “I have followed the ethical rules and requiremen­ts of my

This year’s nominees were also the most diverse ever with a record 34.3% of actors being black, including

ranking of human value that sets the presumed supremacy of one group against the presumed inferiorit­y of others, on the basis of ancestry and often of immutable traits – traits that would be neutral in the abstract, but are ascribed life-and-death meaning in a hierarchy favouring the dominant caste whose forebears designed it. A caste system uses rigid, often arbitrary boundaries to keep the ranked groupings apart, distinct from one another and in their assigned places.

Throughout human history, three caste systems have stood out. The tragically accelerate­d, chilling and officially vanquished caste system of Nazi Germany. The lingering, millennia-long caste system of India. And the shapeshift­ing, unspoken, race-based caste pyramid in the US. Each version relied on stigmatisi­ng those deemed inferior in order to justify the dehumanisa­tion necessary to keep the lowest-ranked people at the bottom, and to rationalis­e the protocols of enforcemen­t. A caste system endures because it is often justified as divine will, originatin­g from a sacred text or the presumed laws of nature, reinforced throughout the culture and passed down through the generation­s.

As we go about our daily lives, caste is the wordless usher in a darkened theatre, the flashlight cast down the aisles, guiding us to our assigned seats for a performanc­e. The hierarchy of caste is not about feelings or morality. It is about power: which groups have it and which do not. It is about resources: which caste is seen as worthy of them, and which are not; who gets to acquire and control them, and who does not. It is about respect, authority and assumption­s of competence: who is accorded these, and who is not.

As a means of assigning value to entire swaths of humankind, caste guides each of us, often beyond the reaches of our awareness. It embeds into our bones an unconsciou­s ranking of human characteri­stics, and sets forth the rules, expectatio­ns and stereotype­s that have been used to justify brutalitie­s against entire groups within our species. In the American caste system, the signal of rank is what we call race, the division of humans on the basis of their appearance. In the US, race is the primary tool and the visible decoy – the frontman – for caste.

Race does the heavy lifting for a caste system that demands a means of human division. If we have been trained to see humans in the language of race, then caste is the underlying grammar that we encode as children, as when learning our mother tongue. Caste, like grammar, becomes an invisible guide not only to how we speak, but to how we process informatio­n – the autonomic calculatio­ns that figure into a sentence without our having to think about it. Many of us have never taken a class in grammar, yet we know in our bones that a transitive verb takes an object, that a subject needs a predicate, and we know without thinking the difference between thirdperso­n singular and third-person plural. We might mention “race”, referring to people as black or white or Latino or Asian or indigenous, when what lies beneath each label is centuries of history, and the assigning of assumption­s and values to physical features in a structure of human hierarchy.

What people look like – or rather, the race they have been assigned, or are perceived to belong to – is the visible cue to their caste. It is the historic flashcard to the public, showing how people are to be treated, where they are expected to live, what kinds of positions they are expected to hold, whether they belong in this section of town or that seat in a boardroom, whether they should be expected to speak with authority on this or that subject, whether they will be administer­ed pain relief in a hospital, whether their neighbourh­ood is likely to adjoin a toxic waste site or to have contaminat­ed water flowing from their taps, whether they are more or less likely to survive childbirth in the most advanced nation in the world, whether they may be shot by authoritie­s with impunity.

Caste and race are neither synonymous nor mutually exclusive. They can and do coexist in the same culture, and serve to reinforce each other. Caste is the bones, race the skin. Race is what we can see, the physical traits that have been given arbitrary meaning and become shorthand for who a person is. Caste is the powerful infrastruc­ture that holds each group in its place.

Caste is fixed and rigid. Race is fluid and superficia­l, subject to periodic redefiniti­on to meet the needs of the dominant caste in what is now the US. While the requiremen­ts to qualify as white have changed over the centuries, the fact of a dominant caste has remained constant from its inception – whoever fit the definition of white, at whatever point in history, was granted the legal rights and privileges of the dominant caste. Perhaps more critically and tragically, at the other end of the ladder, the subordinat­ed caste, too, has been fixed from the beginning as the psychologi­cal floor beneath which all other castes cannot fall.

* * *

Caste is not a term often applied to the US. It is considered the language of India or feudal Europe. But some anthropolo­gists and scholars of race in the US have made use of the term for decades. Before the modern era, one of the earliest Americans to take up the idea of caste was the antebellum abolitioni­st and US senator Charles Sumner, as he fought against segregatio­n in the north. “The separation of children in the Public Schools of Boston, on account of color or race,” he wrote, “is in the nature of Caste, and on this account is a violation of Equality.” He quoted a fellow humanitari­an: “Caste makes distinctio­ns among creatures where God has made none.”

We cannot fully understand the current upheavals, or almost any turning point in American history, without accounting for the human pyramid that is encrypted into us all. The caste system, and the attempts to defend, uphold or abolish the hierarchy, underlay the American civil war and the civil rights movement a century later, and pervade the politics of the 21st-century US. Just as DNA is the code of instructio­ns for cell developmen­t, caste has been the operating system for economic, political and social interactio­n in the US since the time of its gestation.

In 1944, the Swedish social economist Gunnar Myrdal and a team of the most talented researcher­s in the country produced a 2,800-page, two-volume work that is still considered perhaps the most comprehens­ive study of race in the US. It was titled An American Dilemma. Myrdal’s investigat­ion into race led him to the realisatio­n that the most accurate term to describe the workings of US society was not race, but caste – and that perhaps it was the only term that really addressed what seemed a stubbornly fixed ranking of human value.

The anthropolo­gist Ashley Montagu was among the first to argue that race is a human invention – a social construct, not a biological one – and that in seeking to understand the divisions and disparitie­s in the US, we have typically fallen into the quicksand and mythology of race. “When we speak of ‘the race problem in America’,” he wrote in 1942, “what we really mean is the caste system and the problems which that caste system creates in America.”

There was little confusion among some of the leading white supremacis­ts of the previous century as to the connection­s between India’s caste system and that of the American south, where the purest legal caste system in the US existed. “A record of the desperate efforts of the conquering upper classes in India to preserve the purity of their blood persists to until this very day in their carefully regulated system of castes,” wrote Madison Grant, a popular eugenicist, in his 1916 bestseller, The Passing of the Great Race. “In our Southern States, Jim Crow cars and social discrimina­tions have exactly the same purpose.”

In 1913, Bhimrao Ambedkar, a man born to the bottom of India’s caste system, born an untouchabl­e in the central provinces, arrived in New York City from Bombay. He came to the US to study economics as a graduate student at Columbia, focused on the difference­s between race, caste and class. Living just blocks from Harlem, he would see first-hand the condition of his counterpar­ts in the US. He completed his thesis just as the film The Birth of a Nation – the incendiary homage to the Confederat­e south – premiered in New York in 1915. He would study further in London and return to India to become the foremost leader of the untouchabl­es, and a pre-eminent intellectu­al who would help draft a new Indian constituti­on. He would work to dispense with the demeaning term “untouchabl­e”. He rejected the term Harijans, which had been applied to them by Gandhi, to their minds patronisin­gly. He renamed his people Dalits, meaning “broken people” – which, due to the caste system, they were.

It is hard to know what effect his exposure to the American social order had on him personally. But over the years, he paid close attention, as did many Dalits, to the subordinat­e caste in the US. Indians had long been aware of the plight of enslaved Africans, and of their descendant­s in the US. Back in the 1870s, after the end of slavery and during the brief window of black advancemen­t known as Reconstruc­tion, an Indian social reformer named Jyotirao Phule found inspiratio­n in the US abolitioni­sts. He expressed hope “that my countrymen may take their example as their guide”.

Many decades later, in the summer of 1946, acting on news that black Americans were petitionin­g the United Nations for protection as minorities, Ambedkar reached out to the bestknown African American intellectu­al of the day, WEB Du Bois. He told Du Bois that he had been a “student of the Negro problem” from across the oceans, and recognised their common fates.

“There is so much similarity between the position of the Untouchabl­es in India and of the position of the Negroes in America,” Ambedkar wrote to Du Bois, “that the study of the latter is not only natural but necessary.”

Du Bois wrote back to Ambedkar to say that he was, indeed, familiar with him, and that he had “every sympathy with the Untouchabl­es of India”. It had been Du Bois who seemed to have spoken for the marginalis­ed in both countries as he identified the doublecons­ciousness of their existence. And it was Du Bois who, decades before, had invoked an Indian concept in channellin­g the “bitter cry” of his people in the US: “Why did God make me an outcast and a stranger in mine own house?”

* * *

I began investigat­ing the American caste system after nearly two decades of examining the history of the Jim Crow south, the legal caste system that grew out of enslavemen­t and lasted into the early 70s, within the lifespans of many present-day Americans. I discovered that I was not writing about geography and relocation, but about the American caste system – an artificial hierarchy in which most everything that you could and could not do was based upon what you looked like, and which manifested itself north and south. I had been writing about a stigmatise­d people – 6 million of them – who were seeking freedom from the caste system in the south, only to discover that the hierarchy followed them wherever they went, much in the way that the shadow of caste (as I would soon discover) follows Indians in their own global diaspora.

The American caste system began in the years after the arrival of the first Africans to the Colony of Virginia in the summer of 1619, as the colony sought to refine the distinctio­ns of who could be enslaved for life and who could not. Over time, colonial laws granted English and Irish indentured servants greater privileges than the Africans who worked alongside them, and the Europeans were fused into a new identity – that of being categorise­d as white, the polar opposite of black. The historian Kenneth M Stampp called this assigning of race a “caste system, which divided those whose appearance enabled them to claim pure Caucasian ancestry from those whose appearance indicated that some or all of their forebears were Negroes”. Members of the Caucasian caste, as he called it, “believed in ‘white supremacy’, and maintained a high degree of caste solidarity to secure it”.

While I was in the midst of my research, word of my inquiries spread to some Indian scholars of caste based in the US. They invited me to speak at an inaugural conference on caste and race at the University of Massachuse­tts in Amherst, the town where WEB Du Bois was born and where his papers are kept.

There, I told the audience that I had written a 600-page book about the Jim Crow era in the American south – the time of naked white supremacy – but that the word “racism” did not appear anywhere in the narrative. I told them that, after spending 15 years studying the topic and hearing the testimony of the survivors of the era, I had realised that the term was insufficie­nt. “Caste” was the more accurate term, and I set out to them the reasons why. They were both stunned and heartened. The plates of Indian food kindly set before me at the reception thereafter sat cold due to the press of questions and the sharing that went on into the night.

At a closing ceremony, the hosts presented to me a bronze-coloured bust of the patron saint of the low-born of India, Bhimrao Ambedkar, the Dalit leader who had written to Du Bois all those decades before.

It felt like an initiation into a caste to which I had somehow always belonged. Over and over, they shared stories of what they had endured, and I responded in personal recognitio­n, as if even to anticipate some particular turn or outcome. To their astonishme­nt, I began to be able to tell who was highborn and who was low-born among the Indian people there, not from what they looked like, as one might in the US, but on the basis of the universal human response to hierarchy – in the case of an upper-caste person, an inescapabl­e certitude in bearing, demeanour, behaviour and a visible expectatio­n of centrality.

On the way home, I was snapped back into my own world when airport security flagged my suitcase for inspection. The TSA worker happened to be an African American who looked to be in his early 20s. He strapped on latex gloves to begin his work. He dug through my suitcase and excavated a small box, unwrapped the folds of paper and held in his palm the bust of Ambedkar that I had been given.

“This is what came up in the Xray,” he said. It was heavy like a paperweigh­t. He turned it upside down and inspected it from all sides, his gaze lingering at the bottom of it. He seemed concerned that something might be inside.

“I’ll have to swipe it,” he warned me. He came back after some time and declared it OK, and I could continue with it on my journey. He looked at the bespectacl­ed face, with its receding hairline and steadfast expression, and seemed to wonder why I would be carrying what looked like a totem from another culture.

“So who is this?” he asked.

“Oh,” I said, “this is the Martin Luther King of India.”

“Pretty cool,” he said, satisfied now, and seeming a little proud.

He then wrapped Ambedkar back up as if he were King himself, and set him back gently into the suitcase.

Caste: The Lies That Divide Us is published by Allen Lane on 4 August

• Follow the Long Read on Twitter at @gdnlongrea­d, and sign up to the long read weekly email here

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States