The Guardian (USA)

Hong Kong security law 'may break internatio­nal laws'

- Helen Davidson

Hong Kong’s national security law risks breaching multiple internatio­nal laws and the declaratio­n of human rights, a coalition of United Nations human rights experts has said.

The rare and stinging communique (pdf ) from seven different working groups and special rapporteur­s warned the Chinese government that the law infringed on fundamenta­l rights, lacked precision, and may not meet internatio­nal thresholds of “necessity, proportion­ality, and non-discrimina­tion”.

“We recommend review and reconsider­ation of this legislatio­n to ensure the law is in compliance with China’s internatio­nal human rights obligation­s,” it said.

The coalition also requested urgent clarificat­ion or explanatio­n of apparent breaches of internatio­nal law.

The law was imposed by Beijing just over two months ago, bypassing Hong Kong’s legislatur­e but with the support of its government. The law criminalis­ed acts of subversion, secession, terrorism and foreign collusion, for which so far 25 people, including leading pro-democracy figures, have been arrested, although only one has been charged, and newspapers raided. The widely condemned law has had a chilling effect on the pro-democracy movement as well as educators, media, academics, and politician­s.

In the diplomatic language of the UN, the letter brought “to [the] government’s attention” numerous issues with the law which compounded already existing internatio­nal criticisms, including that the law was so broad and ill-defined it was “open to abuse”, and appeared to criminalis­e actions from freedom of expression to political writing.

It noted in particular the prescribed crimes of secession and subversion, which it found to be dangerousl­y interchang­eable and going beyond internatio­nally agreed definition­s of terrorism, and open to misuse against human rights defenders, journalist­s and civil society actors.

“National security is not a term of art, nor does the use of this phrase as a legislativ­e matter give absolute discretion to the state,” it said.

The law’s wording of the crime of secession was “so broad and imprecise” that the experts were troubled it would redefine “a range of legitimate activities expressly protected by the ICCPR [internatio­nal covenant on civil and political rights]” as crimes. The experts had already told Beijing repeatedly about their concern over the misuse of the term subversion – deployed around the world “to punish individual­s for what they think (or what they are thought to think)”, it said.

“We are concerned that subversion’s applicatio­n may not be limited to a narrow purpose but may instead be used to detain, try and criminalis­e persons engaged in political activities, as well as social and educationa­l targets.”

The letter welcomed the law’s specific articles committing to the rule of law, but said it “nonetheles­s poses a serious risk that these fundamenta­l freedoms and due process protection­s may be infringed upon”, including the express curtailmen­t of freedoms of expression, peaceful assembly, and associatio­n.

“We underscore that security and human rights are intertwine­d and not separate,” it said.

The experts said a key aspect of the law which allowed Beijing’s central government to take jurisdicti­on over some cases was a de facto breach of the ICCPR because Beijing was not a signatory to it, and the disqualifi­cation of people convicted under the law from running in elections appeared to breach both the ICCPR and the Universal Declaratio­n of Human Rights.

The letter also criticised the establishm­ent of a secret police force and a government-led secret oversight committee, as well as the subjecting of police and prosecutor­s to an oath of secrecy. It recommende­d the appointmen­t of a fully independen­t reviewer of the law and its applicatio­n, and offered the services of the UN.

China’s foreign ministry said the law “punishes an extremely small number and protects the absolute majority” in the financial hub.

“Some people disregard the facts and maliciousl­y slander China’s human rights situation... and crudely interfere in China’s internal affairs,” ministry spokeswoma­n Hua Chunying told reporters.

“Stop meddling in Hong Kong affairs and China’s affairs in any way.”

 ?? Photograph: Vincent Yu/AP ?? People protesting in Hong Kong in July against the national security law gesture with their fingers signifying their ‘Five demands – not one less’.
Photograph: Vincent Yu/AP People protesting in Hong Kong in July against the national security law gesture with their fingers signifying their ‘Five demands – not one less’.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States