The Guardian (USA)

Netflix should testify before Congress over Cuties? The culture war is out of control

- Jessa Crispin

It’s inspiring to see the left and the right of the US finally unite to create a bipartisan statement: there is a French movie that is bad and we should do something about it. It’s not a second stimulus package or universal healthcare, but in our polarized culture, we take what we can get.

Cuties, which is directed by French-Senegalese Maïmouna Doucouré, is set in Paris and follows Amy, the 11-yearold daughter of Senegalese immigrants, who is torn between her traditiona­l Islamic upbringing and her new dance troupe friends who spend their time flirting with boys and twerking and gyrating during rehearsals for a dance competitio­n.

Soon after its release on Netflix, “Cancel Netflix” was trending on Twitter over the weekend. Republican Senator Ted Cruz has called for a Department of Justice investigat­ion into whether the film violated child pornograph­y laws. The Republican senator Josh Hawley asked Netflix to “immediatel­y remove” Cuties and informally invited Netflix to testify about the film before Congress on Twitter. The Democratic congresswo­man Tulsi Gabbard called Cuties “child porn” which she said would “whet the appetite of pedophiles & help fuel the child sex traffickin­g trade”.

The film contains no sex or nudity of the girls themselves, though in one scene in Amy uploads a photo of her genitals on social media (we never see the picture). The dance moves, though sexualized, are no different from the WAP-themed TikToks that teens and pre-teens are posting online by the millions.

Still, the backlash has crystalliz­ed much of the fear around the sexual vulnerabil­ity of children that has been swirling around from the revelation­s around Jeffrey Epstein’s Lolita Express and the QAnon conspiraci­es about child traffickin­g. To critics like Hawley, the film titillates an imagined, enormous audience of insatiable sexual monsters.

Doucouré has been making the rounds trying to do damage control, but it’s too late, the posturing is already solidifyin­g. Cuties has a few film critics as defenders, but the culture war has already probably lost this battle,

and it will not be surprising if Netflix pulls the film and issues an apology to save its subscriber base soon. (It has already apologized for the promotiona­l material for the film, saying it was not representa­tive of the film.)

Cuties is not a good movie, but it’s an artistic failure rather than a moral one. It strings together a series of coming-of-age cliches and engages in the same over-the-top handwringi­ng that its congressio­nal audience does. In one scene, they are seemingly watching about an X-rated sex scene on their smartphone (again, we don’t see any explicit content – only their reaction to it). In another scene they dare each other to sneak into a boys bathroom to try to film a classmate’s private parts while he is at the urinal. Moments like this almost feel like they come directly from the overheated imaginatio­n of Ben Shapiro after watching WAP.

The problem is that the film’s underlying message – it is bad to sexualize young girls – kind of gets lost in all of the sexualizat­ion of young girls happening on screen. Look, I watched it twice in order to write this, and the scene where the preteen girls are all twerking and the camera goes in for a close up of a young girl’s ass barely covered in short shorts made me come this close to taking the QAnon pledge.

It’s happened before, where a work of art creates a public sex panic about the safety of children. There was the various scandals over Sally Mann’s photograph­s of her nude children, Bill Henson’s portraits of pubescent boys and girls, the Larry Clark film Kids, not to mention the David LaChapelle Rolling Stone cover portrait of a childlike but also sexualized 16-year-old Britney Spears in her underwear, clutching a Tellytubby. Each scandal consisted of the obligatory demonstrat­ions of outrage, a smattering of death threats, and of course performed concern for the poor powerless children, who couldn’t possibly know what they were participat­ing in and must be hopelessly damaged as a result.

But no one tried to drag Jann Wenner from Rolling Stone in front of Congress to walk through the cultural relevance of Britney’s Baby One More Time video. And that is because we as a nation had not yet whipped ourselves into a feverish frenzy about traffickin­g, conspirato­rial notion that there is some powerful undergroun­d network of predators and pedophiles, whose tentacles span the country and penetrate the “deep state”. This new panic was a long time coming, built on years of Stranger Danger hysteria, mixed with unresolved anxiety from the Catholic church’s abuse scandal, made frothy by thousands of poorly factchecke­d true crime podcasts and streaming docudramas.

Cuties is bad, but it’s not bad. If we absolutely have to have the culture wars again over children’s welfare, let us make it about things that actually endanger children: Republican­s’ cuts to child social welfare programs, subsidized housing and addiction treatment that only leave the young more vulnerable.

Cuties is not a good movie, but it’s an artistic failure rather than a moral one

 ?? Photograph: AP ?? ‘The problem is that the film’s underlying message – it is bad to sexualize young girls – kind of gets lost in all of the sexualizat­ion of young girls happening on screen.’
Photograph: AP ‘The problem is that the film’s underlying message – it is bad to sexualize young girls – kind of gets lost in all of the sexualizat­ion of young girls happening on screen.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States