The Guardian (USA)

Matt Bomer: 'If Dad was really on fire for the Lord, you knew the hammer would come down'

- Ryan Gilbey

Matt Bomer looks too good to be true: zinging blue eyes, dark shirt partially unbuttoned, glossy black hair a mere kiss-curl away from Christophe­r Reeve-era Superman. The 42year-old actor even has a sunny dispositio­n, despite it being not yet 10am in Los Angeles. He is video-calling from the bright attic room of the home he shares with his husband, the Hollywood publicist Simon Halls, and their three sons; a rubber plant yoo-hoos over his shoulder. Presumably, Bomer just tumbled out of bed looking that way and plonked himself in front of the webcam. “I wish,” he smiles, exuding the faintly weary graciousne­ss of someone whose appearance has been attracting comment since long before he was named sexiest man on TV in 2011. “I’ve already been up a while, making breakfast, getting the kids settled into ‘Zoom school’ and trying to get my meditation in.”

That reference to meditation can’t help but call to mind the Oprah-quoting, reiki-practising stripper Ken, whom he played in the two Magic Mike movies. “I don’t really know if I use the same meditation techniques that Ken does,” he laughs. “But I think there was definitely something about me there which Reid [Carlin, the screenwrit­er] was riffing on.”

Bomer’s latest film, The Boys in the Band, is an altogether pricklier propositio­n. Adapted from Mart Crowley’s 1968 play, a staple of the gay canon, it takes place entirely at a birthday party thrown by Michael (Jim Parsons) for his imperious friend Harold (Zachary Quinto). Bomer plays Michael’s squeeze, Donald, who is content to take a backseat as the bitching and soulbaring stretch into the wee small hours. “Donald has done enough work on himself to be a compassion­ate observer,” Bomer says. “He’s not a saint by any means but he can see outside his own neurosis.”

The actor wasn’t familiar with the play, or with William Friedkin’s 1970 film version, before he was cast in the 50th anniversar­y Broadway run in 2018. That production, which went on to win the Tony for best revival of a play, was a minor breakthrou­gh: it boasted an entirely out gay cast, the same one that has been reunited for the film version. Not that Bomer thinks such roles should be played only by gay performers. “I’ve been doing theatre profession­ally since I was 17,” he says. “Everyone just played everything, really. But I do understand the need for equal opportunit­y and access to roles for people across the LGBTQ spectrum. We need to see access for everyone.” And then? “May the best actor win, I guess.”

The self-pitying tenor of some of the characters may sit uneasily with our fluid and unabashed times but Bomer believes the play’s importance comes from capturing an age before queerness was clearly defined, let alone accepted. “It all takes place a few months before Stonewall,” he points out. “It’s about this moment right before that explosion, that revolution, and in a way the characters feel like they’re going to be trapped in this play until something changes. My favourite line is when Michael asks what time it is and I reply: ‘It’s early.’ I feel that’s true for the movement and where these men were; it really was early in their developmen­t. Donald is looking to the horizon for something beyond all this and there’s nothing there – it’s uncharted territory.”

Making the film took a heavier toll even than performing the show eight times a week. “At the end of the play each night there’s some closure. You’ve purged. Whereas on film, you have time to go home and overthink. It’s this lingering experience that bubbles up throughout the shoot. Sometimes with films I need to do something ritualisti­c to bring the experience to a close once it’s finished.” I ask for an example but he demurs. “Oh, it will all sound too esoteric and strange. I’d rather keep it mysterious than make it corny.” In the absence of further clarificat­ion, we will just have to picture him dancing naked around a campfire as he feeds his Boys in the Band script to the flames one page at a time.

Donald remarks of his sexuality that he has “always known it about myself”. Did Bomer? “I did once I reached my early teens. But I was also part of a very religious family living in a hyperconse­rvative environmen­t in the bible belt in Texas so it became a bifurcated experience for me.” Even television and film were off-limits on occasion. “The boundaries shifted quite a bit. Sometimes they’d be relaxed, sometimes more stringent, depending on where my family’s religious values were at any given time. If Dad was really on fire for the Lord all of a sudden, you knew the hammer would come down. Although my brother and I as kids always found a

way to access everything we wanted to see.” Forbidden fruit, eh? “Exactly. What could be more biblical than that?”

He came out to his parents in a letter, which was met with six months of silence from them followed by a raging argument – and, some years later, their eventual acceptance. A public coming-out occurred in an awards speech in 2012 during which he thanked Halls and their children. His career was already on the rise by then, though it might be argued that there was no other direction it could have gone in after the 2006 horror prequel The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning. “I thought: ‘Michael Bay’s producing, it’s Texas, it’s a world I understand, and it ends with the guy becoming Leatherfac­e with my face on. Why not?’”

He progressed to the science-fiction thriller In Time and landed the lead role as a charming con-artist in six seasons of White Collar; prior to that, he has joked, he starred in so many cancelled TV series that he didn’t realise shows could last for more than one season. His prospects appear not to have been harmed or altered by coming out: he subsequent­ly played a killer in the Russell Crowe/Ryan Gosling comic thriller The Nice Guys, a farmer in the remake of The Magnificen­t Seven and the studio boss Monroe Stahr in a TV version of F Scott Fitzgerald’s The Last Tycoon. (For many years, he was set to play Montgomery Clift in a passion project he had been developing about the actor, though that recently fell through.)

“I’d be lying to you if I said certain things didn’t change for me,” he admits. “Certain rooms I used to frequent – suddenly the door was closed. But I also engaged with artists who don’t care, who just want the actor they believe is best for the role, and those are the artists I wanted to be working with anyway so I don’t count it as any kind of loss.” One of his most loyal collaborat­ors is Ryan Murphy, who produced The Boys in the Band and directed the 2014 TV adaptation of Larry Kramer’s Aids drama The Normal Heart, which won Bomer a Golden Globe.

As someone who grew up gay in the 1980s and 1990s, he is struck by the generation­al difference in attitudes today. “I look at our children’s friends and I see they don’t even bat an eyelid about our boys having two dads. That makes me very optimistic about the future.” Where does work such as The Boys in the Band and The Normal Heart fit into this utopia? “I would be upset if these heroes that came before us were forgotten or went unapprecia­ted. The younger generation I hope will take the time to understand everything our community has been through over the years and to recognise the shoulders we now stand on.”

It’s the sort of climate of equality that resulted recently in Bomer’s 15year old son Kit coming out as straight. “That is a story that people have run with,” he says with a good-natured groan. “I love that he felt so comfortabl­e he could say that. But it wasn’t some big moment where he pulled us aside; it wasn’t eventised. It was casual. Obviously it’s an interestin­g soundbite and very clickbait-y. He thinks it’s hilarious, by the way. He’s like: ‘That’s my favourite story!’” So should we play it down or play it up? “Play it down. He’s 15, you know? We really don’t need to be taking cues from him right now.” I’ll bury it near the end of the article, I promise him.

• The Boys in the Band is on Netflix from 30 September

ing implicatio­ns of his management, holding fast to the patently ridiculous premise that the FBI’s movements are informed by no political leaning. His explanatio­n for the protocol-flouting emails announceme­nt goes that the bureau must break with their custom of not commenting on open cases because the American people deserve to know who they might be voting for. (At this same time, he’s looking into possible ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, which somehow don’t merit the same level of alarm.) He reasons that if Clinton got elected and it turned out that the FBI hadn’t divulged the possibilit­y of her law-breaking, no one would ever trust them again. For this to seem nobly impartial, one must accept that the average American currently trusts the FBI, which, again, big pill.

Comey’s staffer Trisha (Amy Seimetz) steps up as the adult in the room when she notes that publicizin­g the fact they’re looking through Clinton’s computers will tip the scales in favor of Trump. Comey chastises her for even thinking that way, as if his plan is somehow exempt from its obvious partisan realities. This happens again once Trump takes office; Comey’s people beg him to stand against all the blatant violations of the presidency, and he remains confident that the normal mechanisms of government will sort this all out. At his frequent pre-firing dinners with Trump, get-togethers testing the separation between the executive branch and federal law enforcemen­t, Comey stays mum and keeps private notes that will one day take book form. He refuses to realize that doing nothing still counts as doing something. Neutrality, moving trains, et cetera.

Because this series works from Comey’s own tell-some book, A Higher Loyalty, the rationale for his actions lands with the soft touch of an absolution-seeking defense. As Ray would have it, Comey’s problem is that he’s virtuous to a fault. The writing affirms that continuing to play the game and maintain propriety and adhere to tradition was the right thing to do but simply ineffectiv­e under Trump. We now have the perspectiv­e to see that in actuality, this was a form of weakness, a form of compliance, and a form of stupidity. Comey gets to go out on a note of dignity, learning that he’s been dismissed from a TV in the background while he gives a speech to custodians at FBI headquarte­rs that everyone’s work is vitally important. To the end, he keeps a steadfast faith in the very institutio­ns that have thoroughly and repeatedly bungled their responsibi­lities under Trump. The trouble is that Ray mirrors this stance even as he scrupulous­ly illustrate­s the opposite, placing rousing inspiratio­nal music over footage of Comey dooming us all. They jointly believe in nothing but the rules – not goodness, not rightness, only standard operating procedure.

A note to the faction of viewers tuning in for Brendan Gleeson’s take on Trump, the first substantiv­e dramatized portrayal of the sitting commander-in-chief from the realm of prestige TV. He only shows up on night two, and when he does, it’s easy to forget that he’s supposed to be the draw. It’s a fine impression and middling performanc­e, better in its particular­s than in its essence. Visually, he’s a dead ringer in profile, but looks unnatural in headon shots. The hair’s wrong, missing the comb-over’s wispy structural complexiti­es. And though Gleeson’s got the tone of voice down pat, he can’t master the cadence, that aimless lilt that saunters from one half-formed thought to the next.

That might be the writing, which feeds faux-Trump lines more coherent than the free-form word-jazz that spills out of his mouth with a semi-cognizant viscosity. His Trump behaves like a common jerk rather than a nihilistic force of spiteful chaos, which is to say that he’s recognizab­ly human. Ultimately, it all comes back to the same surplus of good faith coloring the depiction of Comey. Ray wants to fit the last four years into a framework comprehens­ible to politics as we know them, when the cruel senselessn­ess plowing through the status quo has always been this administra­tion’s defining feature and greatest weapon. We’re way out where the buses don’t run. No use looking for one to take us home.

The Comey Rule starts on Showtime in the US on 27 September and in the UK on Sky Atlantic on 30 September

 ??  ?? Matt Bomer: ‘The younger generation I hope will take the time to understand everything our community has been through over the years.’ Photograph: Gareth Cattermole/Contour by Getty Images
Matt Bomer: ‘The younger generation I hope will take the time to understand everything our community has been through over the years.’ Photograph: Gareth Cattermole/Contour by Getty Images
 ??  ?? Bomer with Jim Parsons in The Boys in the Band. Photograph: Joan Marcus
Bomer with Jim Parsons in The Boys in the Band. Photograph: Joan Marcus
 ??  ?? Jeff Daniels and Brendan Gleeson in The Comey Rule. Photograph: CBS Television Studios/Ben Mark Holzberg/Showtime
Jeff Daniels and Brendan Gleeson in The Comey Rule. Photograph: CBS Television Studios/Ben Mark Holzberg/Showtime
 ??  ?? Jeff Daniels and Kingsley Ben-Adir as Comey and Barack Obama. Photograph: CBS Television Studios/Ben Mark Holzberg/ Showtime
Jeff Daniels and Kingsley Ben-Adir as Comey and Barack Obama. Photograph: CBS Television Studios/Ben Mark Holzberg/ Showtime

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States