The Guardian (USA)

The Guardian view on lower league football: unsafe in a broken market

- Editorial

Sport has become a touchstone during the pandemic. Whether the continuati­on or otherwise of sports the British hold dear deserves to assume so central a place is another matter. A game is after all only a game, and is of little consequenc­e compared with how hospitals, care homes, schools and universiti­es are coping. But from the government’s wish that televised football recommence to boost the nation’s spirits, to the fraught discussion of which clubs and leagues will survive, the question of sport’s future has been inescapabl­e.

The government has, as in most areas, managed to achieve the worst of all worlds. It has permitted the return of sport but without fans, making many clubs nonviable. Hence the long-running argument over whether the Premier League should bail out the rest of football’s creaking pyramid. There were hopes this might be resolved this week, but as with most things Covid-related – the arts bailout, the future of cinemas, aviation, the night-time economy – there is a stalemate, leaving many organisati­ons to muddle through while the government sits on its hands.

It is valid to ask why lower-league football was allowed to return with little or no income. What purpose is served by Harrogate Town playing Bolton Wanderers in League Two when no fans – these clubs’ principal source of income – are present? Would the Royal Shakespear­e Company stage

Hamlet in an empty theatre for the sheer hell of it? Probably not. There was a brief hope that some fans could be allowed into grounds, but that was quickly dashed. Streaming games will produce some income, but how many takers will pay a tenner a match for a product that is unlikely to come close to the broadcast quality they are used to?

Britain’s sporting bodies, with the connivance of the government, are pretending that nothing has changed when everything has changed. A government trying to steer a middle course between full lockdown and herd immunity has managed to befuddle everyone. Its response to the four horsemen of the apocalypse has been to encourage us to have a bet on the winner.

Do clubs like Harrogate and Bolton Wanderers deserve to survive? Surely they must. These clubs are much more than just a nursery ground for talent. They are deeply woven into their communitie­s and when you take them away a deep hole is left. It’s not the lower leagues’ fault that they have no audience and no income; they are acting on the government’s instructio­ns, and Whitehall or the Premier League, or most likely both, will have to organise a lifeboat. Premier League clubs owe something to those lower down the league. It is only an accident of timing that, say, Brighton and Burnley happened to be in the top division when the pandemic hit as opposed to fallen giants like Sheffield Wednesday and Sunderland. Where is the longterm plan – for football as much as for culture, universiti­es, pubs and restaurant­s, and everything else? The “new normal” isn’t working and the sooner the government admits it, the better.

 ?? Photograph: Isaac Paarkin/News Images/Rex/Shuttersto­ck ?? Harrogate Town’s George Thomson and Bolton Wanderers’ Ryan Delaney playing to an empty stadium on 3 October. ‘What purpose is served by Harrogate Town playing Bolton Wanderers in League Two when no fans – these clubs’ principal source of income – are present?’
Photograph: Isaac Paarkin/News Images/Rex/Shuttersto­ck Harrogate Town’s George Thomson and Bolton Wanderers’ Ryan Delaney playing to an empty stadium on 3 October. ‘What purpose is served by Harrogate Town playing Bolton Wanderers in League Two when no fans – these clubs’ principal source of income – are present?’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States