The Guardian (USA)

Linda Ronstadt: 'I had to sing those songs or I was going to die'

- Jim Farber

From the start of her career, Linda Ronstadt has talked to the media about her Mexican heritage. “Back in 1967, Tiger Beat magazine asked me what my ambition was for my career,” she recalled. “I said I want to become a really good Mexican singer. But it wasn’t noticed or validated.”

Then, in the 1970s, when Ronstadt became a major star, she told Rolling Stone that her biggest influence was the Mexican singer Lola Beltrán. “But they spelled it Laura Del Turone,” she recalled. “They didn’t bother to get her name right because they didn’t think it mattered.”

Even in the late 80s, when Ronstadt made her heritage as obvious as possible by appearing in traditiona­l Mexican garb on the Today Show while promoting an album she had cut of classic songs from that country, Canciones de Mi Padre, the show’s puzzled host, Jane Pauley, asked if her father was “halfMexica­n”.

“Actually, he’s allMexican,” a flabbergas­ted Ronstadt answered.

“She was trying to soften the blow of the word Mexican,” the singer recalled. “That’s typical of what happens. Mexican Americans are always made to feel invisible.”

The singer’s lifelong frustratio­n with that situation is one of the main reasons she took part in a poignant new documentar­y titled Linda and the Mockingbir­ds. The film illuminate­s Ronstadt’s near 30-year relationsh­ip with Los Cenzontles Cultural Arts Academy, an educationa­l organizati­on in the Bay Area that builds pride in young Mexican Americans by schooling them in the music and dance of their ancestral land. The heart of the film chronicles a 2019 trip Ronstadt financed for Los Cenzontles (an Aztecan term for the Mockingbir­ds) to travel to the rural town of Banámichi, where her grandfathe­r grew up, to perform with the folkloric dance troupe Grupo Danza

Xunutzi. For extra star power, Ronstadt brought along Jackson Browne, another strong supporter of the school.

The new documentar­y grew out of an earlier one released last year, The Sound of My Voice, which covered Ronstadt’s musical career. The star, who no longer sings due to her 2013 diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, was reluctant to take part in the earlier film and agreed to be interviewe­d for it only if the film-makers followed her trip to Mexico. “I didn’t want to just be a talking head sitting in my living room talking about retirement,” she said.

The vibrancy of the music performed by Los Cenzontles, as well as the ugly politics that have affected both

Mexicans and Mexican Americans in Trump’s “build the wall” era, inspired the film’s director, James Keach, to make the film. A key scene in it captures one of the organizati­on’s most accomplish­ed singers, Lucina Rodriguez, talking in front of the border wall about the harrowing experience she had as a child while crossing into the US with her family from her birthplace in Guadalajar­a. As it happened, Ronstadt and the singers arrived to film at the border the very day the Trump administra­tion announced a state of emergency there. “We got to see exactly what the ‘emergency’ was,” Ronstadt said. “It was a few citizens walking around the streets shopping for groceries or picking up the newspaper. There were no hordes of brown people clawing to get across the border. But, all along, the Trump administra­tion has been encouragin­g resentment of people from Mexico.”

As a prime example, she cites a horrific incident that occurred the other week in which the trumpet player for the Mavericks, Lorenzo Molina Ruiz, and his friend Orlando Morales, were allegedly violently attacked in a restaurant in Cool Springs, Tennessee, for speaking Spanish. Morales reportedly suffered a broken nose, internal bleeding and a concussion. Ronstadt blames the incident on the atmosphere fanned by the current administra­tion. “As soon as Trump came down that escalator and called Mexican rapists, I said, ‘This is the new Hitler and Mexicans are the new Jews,’” she said.

The result has greatly exacerbate­d feelings of alienation and internaliz­ed shame that have long affected Mexican Americans, according to Los Cenzontles founder Eugene Rodriguez. “It’s a deep shame – one we don’t like to talk about,” he said. “It’s something instilled in us by 500 years of colonialis­m in Mexico.”

Rodriguez feels that teaching young Mexican Americans about the variety

and sophistica­tion of that country’s music and art can help heal some of that shame. “If you’re playing with people who are among your community it’s a way to feel empowered and free,” he said. “They can take our land. They can kill us, but they can’t take our culture.”

For Ronstadt, Mexican culture has always been a source of pride. She believes she managed to escape the scourge of internaliz­ed prejudice because of her light skin and German surname. (Ronstadt’s great-grandfathe­r immigrated from Germany to Mexico in the 1800s). “People didn’t have a clue I was Mexican unless they grew up with me,” she said.

At the same time, her ability to “pass” means that people felt free to voice their prejudices against Chicanos in front of her. “I heard plenty of it,” she said. “I’d straighten them out fast.”

Ronstadt grew up in a household in Arizona where her extended family always sang Mexican songs. She always yearned to record them but her record company nixed the idea. “I told them, ‘I’ve got all these songs in Spanish and I’m sure they’d be hits,” she said. “One of them was La Bamba and one was La Negra. I said, ‘If La Bamba was a hit, I can make La Negra a hit.”

But, she said, the company told her that Joan Baez had already recorded an album in Spanish for the label (Gracias a La Vida in 1974), so she couldn’t. Still, she bided her time. After the singer had giant hits with albums covering American standards in the early 80s, years before it became a significan­t trend for contempora­ry singers to do so, she told her record company her plans to cut an all-Mexican work. She said the company’s executives “were horrified. But I had to sing those songs or I was going to die.”

The resulting collection wound up becoming the biggest-selling non-English language album in history. Ronstadt believes that album touched so many people with no experience in this music because the songs have “emotion that’s very accessible. If it worked on me, I figured it would work on other people,” she said.

It was a great relief to Ronstadt to finally sing these songs after years of belting out rock anthems in stadiums. “I was bored with rock’n’roll,” she said. “And I was tired of singing fast songs. I’m a ballad singer. And I like drama and nuance. This music has richer poetic images and more interestin­g rhythms.”

The songs she sang on the first of three Mexican records she recorded came from the northern region of Sonora, where her family’s roots lie. “There is a lot of German and French influence there,” she said. “The music uses accordions and Germanstyl­e brass bands, reinterpre­ted in a Mexican style. I like to say that Mexicans took German and French music and made it sexy.”

Rodriguez remembers very well hearing Ronstadt’s Mexican music in the 1980s. Many in his community, he says, didn’t know about her heritage at the time, but once they found out, it engendered pride. “All the girls in the neighborho­od wanted to sing like Linda,” he said.

Rodriguez first met Ronstadt in the early 1990s, when she came across his students performing. She was deeply impressed by their authentic rendering of traditiona­l music from a land some of them had never seen. “They were playing music for the right reasons, to express their feelings and to connect with their grandparen­ts,” she said. “They’re not performing like trained seals.”

Their work moved her so much, she started bringing her famous friends to see them, including Browne (who wound up writing a song with Rodriguez about the plight of Mexican immigrants titled The Dreamer), Bonnie Raitt and the Chieftains, who took Los Cenzontles on tour with them. The group has also worked with David Hidalgo of Los Lobos, recorded scores of their own albums and produced their own documentar­ies. Collective­ly, their work captures the unique experience of Mexicans in America. “Mexican America is like its own country,” said Ronstadt. “We call it Aztlan, after the mythical places where the Aztecs originated from.”

In one of the most wrenching scenes in the film, Rodriguez expresses his anger over the treatment of Chicanos in the US, a feeling Ronstadt shares. “I get especially angry when I see how people are treated when they come up here looking for work, especially the farm workers,” she said. “I challenge any prep school white boy to spend an hour picking strawberri­es in the full sun where you’re bent over and somebody sprays pesticide on you. And without them, we can’t eat.”

At the same time, the film captures the joy, humor and skill of the music. One moving scene shows a student performing A la Orilla de un Palmar, a song about an orphaned Mexican girl which Ronstadt first heard sung by relatives when she was three. As the student performs the song in the film we see Ronstadt mouthing along with the words. “I don’t sing any more,” she said. “But I’m still involved with music. Los Cenzontles is my musical home now.”

Linda and the Mockingbir­ds is now available digitally in the US with a UK date to be announced

of his feet, and must be carried from place to place. Sam has become a freak, a Frankenste­in monster; in some respects, Fussell’s memoir is a Frankenste­in story, which is really the story of Prometheus – which can also be viewed as a story of the very American desire for human perfectibi­lity.

In Muscle, the features of masculinit­y are entwined with the features of American capitalism, which is premised on creating new needs – needs that can never be met, because they aren’t actual needs. Capitalism tells us something is wrong with us, something elusive and ultimately unfixable. In other words, capitalism is a vortex of shame.

The more I tried to perfect my own body at the gym, the more wrapped up I got in this shame. I was increasing­ly desperate to fix and repair myself, to avail myself of all the products and treatments I could to plug the holes of my many male deficienci­es. But the thing about masculinit­y is it’s pegged to a fictive status quo; it is something you either “work toward” and police endlessly, or give up on altogether. Eventually, that is what I did. I grew exhausted by my strenuous efforts to become a perfect male specimen. I moved to Iowa City for graduate school, and became a paunchy average guy.

Muscle, too, ends with Fussell’s devolution into an ordinary man. His muscles – the signifiers of his masculinit­y, the linchpin of his performanc­e – shrivel and die, and he is just a human being again, vulnerable to life and pain and human feeling.

Near the end of the book, Fussell describes an encounter with a woman who had previously rebuffed his overdone musculatur­e. Meeting again, she eyes his newly unmuscled physique. “There’s nothing left,” she exclaims in dismay. “What have you done?” Her response reminds me of Ellen’s question to Celine Dion: When are you gonna cut that hair? The boy’s hair, like Sam’s unmuscled physique, represents what – for both of these women – is an intolerabl­e absence: an absence of masculinit­y.

But if masculinit­y is so powerful and immutable, who or what could take this from men? When I was young, to be “emasculate­d” seemed a kind of murder, a violence. And yet if we try to define the violence, what is it? What is this thing we could subtract or remove that would prevent men from being themselves?

Ultimately, the mechanism that defines or runs the thing we call masculinit­y is incredibly fragile. It is so frail that something as trivial as the wearing of a pink shirt, or the donning of a mask in a global pandemic, might throw its gears into some irreparabl­e turmoil. Is something that frail worth protecting?

Years after that early traumatic haircut, I did finally begin to grow my hair long. I was seventeen years old – over a decade later – and I was a junior at a New York City prep school. One afternoon my headmaster confronted me in the hallway. He said boys couldn’t have long hair, that it went against school rules, and that I would have to cut it, and I broke down sobbing in front of him. My response was incommensu­rate with the prohibitio­n. It hadn’t occurred to me until this writing that my response was really a response to that haircut, and the shame I carried – and continue to carry. I spent weeks avoiding writing this essay. Until now, I have never spoken or written about my experience at the hairdresse­r. But this is the power of shame, which exerts a far-reaching, often irrational hold on its subjects.

Shame is not a mood, or an attitude; I’m not sure it could even be properly classified as an emotion. Where feelings like happiness or anger eventually dissipate, shame does not fade or vanish on its own. “It will be like a miracle,” Trump famously proclaimed about the virus that has killed nearly a quarter million Americans. “One day it will disappear.” That denial is not merely primitive or naive – it is killing people. The virus will not disappear. Shame does not miraculous­ly go away. And it cannot be defeated with the weapons men use to claim power in the world.

A reckoning must take place, but what is the nature of this reckoning? Maybe it’s a matter of crossing the invisible lines – or, rather, making the invisible visible. In some respects, this has already begun. We’re in a new cultural moment. Millennial­s and Gen Z are doing the difficult work of breaking down rigid categories of gender. Structures and systems are eroding, and what we once saw as sources of stability are being revealed as outmoded or inutile – or worse – as reinforcin­g social oppression.

I initially felt resistance to talk of gender dying out. But when I look at my own resistance I land right back at that familiar place, the lonely cold province of shame.

If we stop prizing masculinit­y as a cultural value, this doesn’t mean we stop men from “being men”. In a recent interview with the New Statesman, the theorist Judith Butler makes the clarificat­ion. “By gender freedom,” she says, “I do not mean we all get to choose our gender. Rather, we get to make a political claim to live freely and without fear of discrimina­tion and violence against the genders that we are.”

In other words, if gender dies, we don’t die with it. Our human selves won’t die. What dies is the demand for a performanc­e no one should have to give.

David Adjmi writes for theatre and television. His play Stereophon­ic is scheduled to premiere on Broadway next season, and his memoir Lot Six was recently published by HarperColl­ins

Shame and masculinit­y have a reciprocal relationsh­ip – and they share the same vague contours

 ??  ?? Linda Ronstadt: Shout Factory ‘Mexican-Americans are always made to feel invisible.’ Photograph:
Linda Ronstadt: Shout Factory ‘Mexican-Americans are always made to feel invisible.’ Photograph:
 ??  ?? Ronstadt at the Country Music Associatio­n awards show in 1986. Photograph:
Ronstadt at the Country Music Associatio­n awards show in 1986. Photograph:

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States