The Guardian (USA)

OANN: what is the alternativ­e farright media outlet Trump is pushing?

- Jason Wilson

For some time now, and particular­ly since his election loss, the romance between Donald Trump and Fox News has appeared to be souring. The president has depicted Fox News’s actions on election night, and in the days since, as unforgivab­le acts of betrayal – and is now urging his supporters to turn to One America News Network (OANN), a far-right media outlet .

On Sunday, annoyed by the appearance of former Democratic presidenti­al contender Pete Buttigieg on Fox News, Trump tweeted: “This is why @FoxNews daytime and weekend daytime have lost their ratings... Many great alternativ­es are forming & exist. Try @OANN & @newsmax, among others!”

That tweet came after another outburst on Saturday – in which Trump claimed that the Fox had downplayed the size of Million Maga March protests – and another on Thursday, which he followed up with a volley of retweets demanding that conservati­ves make the switch to more reliable vectors of pro-Trump broadcasti­ng.

Considerin­g Trump’s considerab­le gifts as a salesman, OANN is set to hugely benefit from his push. But what

do we know about them, and how has the network attracted the president’s favor?

OANN was founded in 2013 in San Diego, California. It is owned by Herring Broadcasti­ng, a family company founded by rightwing businessma­n Robert Herring, and is led by his son, Charles Herring.

The network has spent most of its history in the long shadow cast by Fox, competing for the attention of conservati­ves with a wave of strident rightwing commentato­rs on various social media platforms.

At first, OANN struggled to register with viewers or forge itself a distinct identity. Any notice they received in their first few years mostly came as a result of viral rants from their breakout star, Tomi Lahren, who worked there for a year from August 2014 before leaving for Glenn Beck’s The Blaze on her way to Fox’s subscripti­on streaming service, Fox Nation. Lahren’s presence exemplifie­d the network’s tenor at that time: a harder-edged Fox, minus the audience.

The network finally found its metier with the ascendancy of Donald Trump, gradually becoming the inhouse broadcaste­r for the parallel universe inhabited by the president and the movement he inspired. In the process, they jettisoned not only any pretense to journalist­ic credibilit­y, but factuality itself.

OANN has been energetic throughout Trump’s presidency in pushing any narrative that might favor his interests, including numerous baseless conspiracy theories. They gave credence to every signature Trumpist falsehood: that George Soros both funded a socalled refugee “caravan” and collaborat­ed with Nazis as a teenager; that there was no chemical weapons attack in Douma, Syria, in 2018; that Parkland mass shooting survivor David Hogg had been “coached” for his media appearance­s by his father, a former FBI agent.

The network has also ceaselessl­y spread disinforma­tion about the Covid-19 pandemic. In March 2019, OANN White House correspond­ent Chanel Rion fronted a special broadcast in which she asserted that the virus had been deliberate­ly synthesize­d as a bioweapon in a North Carolina laboratory. She relied on a source whom she called a “monitored source amongst a certain set in the DC intelligen­ce community”, but whose public profile mainly consists promulgati­ng wild conspiracy theories on social media.

The next month, Rion and other OANN staff were bounced from the White House Correspond­ents Associatio­n; she lost her seat in briefings after she refused to follow social distancing guidelines.

By May, Kristian Rouz – who was then working for OANN and the Kremlin-owned Sputnik radio news service – ran a package on the network asserting a wholly different conspiracy theory: that the virus was being employed in a “globalist conspiracy” involving George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and the Chinese Communist party to institute global population control.

To the extent that these outlandish falsehoods were taken seriously by the OANN audience, they worked to deflect blame from Trump for the mismanagem­ent of the pandemic.

Not satisfied with merely pandering to the Magaverse, OANN has also opened its doors to its most truthavers­e personalit­ies. Since 2018, they have employed Jack Posobiec as a political correspond­ent and on-air presenter.

Posobiec first achieved a degree of prominence as a key player in spreading the so-called “Pizzagate” conspiracy theory, and this year the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch ran a series of articles connecting Posobiec with far-right extremists and white supremacis­ts in the US and abroad. Posobiec interviewe­d Logan Cook, a prolific creator of pro-Trump memes, under a false name without informing his audience of the pseudonym.

While Trump seeks to magnify its influence, it’s difficult to tell exactly how big OANN’s audience is: audience measuremen­t company Comscore reportedly does not track its audience numbers because OANN’s audience does not meet the “minimum reporting standards” required to be included in the firm’s data, and OANN itself does not subscribe to the industry-standard Nielsen ratings.

But in 2019, Nielsen ran their numbers anyway, and found that they were averaging just 14,000 viewers. In the same period, Fox News had 45 times this amount, with 635,000 viewers.

Earlier this year, Donald Trump Jr was rumored to want to buy OANN. This claim was denied by Robert Herring, but Trump’s election loss has renewed speculatio­n that he may seek an off ramp into a rightwing media venture of his own.

 ??  ??
 ?? Photograph: Carolyn Kaster/AP ?? OANN finally found its metier with the ascendancy of Donald Trump.
Photograph: Carolyn Kaster/AP OANN finally found its metier with the ascendancy of Donald Trump.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States