The Guardian (USA)

It was hard not to laugh at Rudy Giuliani's hair malfunctio­n – but it's time to stop equating looks with character

- Emma Beddington

Weren’t the pictures of Rudy Giuliani’s hair malfunctio­n last week wonderful? I was transfixed by footage of him bug-eyed and ranting at a press conference, as dark rivulets of hair dye (or mascara, expert opinion was divided) ran down his sweaty cheeks. The incident spawned a delighted outpouring of comment and mocking tweets. He was a Scooby-Doo villain unmasked; a gargoyle, a comic-book grotesque, and it felt so apt. For critics, it was as if corruption, lies and moral turpitude were finally oozing out of him as a tarry discharge.

It is the same satisfacti­on we feel as we dissect the brittle spun-sugar edifice of Trump’s hair, the harshly theatrical lines of his makeup (“una naranja espantosa”, a scary orange, as a White House housekeepe­r described it to the Washington Post) or his cack-handed panda-eye concealer habit. It is delicious when the facade cracks, especially in one so obsessed with surface. It feels like poetic justice when a man who built a gold tower, regularly comments on his daughter’s looks and mocked a disabled reporter is caught looking diminished and ridiculous.

No amount of expensive vanity, it seems, can cover what is essentiall­y rotten about these men: the ugliness keeps showing through. “If a person has ugly thoughts it begins to show on the face,” Roald Dahl wrote in The Twits. Except, of course, that is nonsense. I don’t believe for a moment that any of us actually thinks there is any correlatio­n between looks and character. So why do we still allow and amplify this lazy trope?

Years of cultural conditioni­ng doesn’t help, I suppose. Hollywood has been conflating ugliness and moral failing since cinema began, and Shakespear­e was doing it 500 years ago. The messaging is at its most intense in childhood: villains, from Disney to Harry Potter, are fat, disfigured or ugly. David Walliams has been called out for it; Dahl is infamous for it. Reading The Witches to my sons when they were small was an odd experience: they adored the story and Quentin Blake’s enchanting illustrati­ons, but the diagram and explanatio­n of an unmasked witch confused them – because it looked like me. I have alopecia and, like the witches, am bald beneath my wig. Was I planning to turn them into mice?

Even in 2020, Anne Hathaway’s Grand High Witch in the new screen version is revealed, beneath her disguise, to be a bald monster with disfigured, claw-like hands. Weary disability campaigner­s were provoked into action once more on the film’s release, condemning yet another depiction of disability as evil. People with limb difference­s, from Paralympia­ns to Bake Off’s Briony Williams tweeted pictures of themselves tagged #notawitch and Warner Bros was flustered into one of those weaselly not-quite apologies. The studio declared it was “deeply saddened … our depiction of the fictional characters in The Witches could upset people with disabiliti­es”.

Things are slowly changing: the British Film Institute has said it will not support films with facially scarred villains, and the campaignin­g group RespectAbi­lity is dedicated to analysing shortcomin­gs in Hollywood’s portrayal of disability and trying to shift its portrayals.

From a fictional perspectiv­e, it is surely more interestin­g to subvert the “ugliness as evil” trope anyway. One of the best things about the Amazon’s ultra-gory, superheroe­s-gone-bad series The Boys is how absurdly good-looking the truly repellent baddies are, all chiselled cheekbones and dewy beauty.

But this reframing needs to go further than fiction, and that is up to us. Corruption and amorality can also be high-definition glossy and ready for its closeup: think of Ivanka and Jared. The next generation of hard-right demagogues probably won’t look like Trump or Steve Bannon (another whose general aura of dissolutio­n and decay it is terribly hard not to conflate with his repellent politics). Isn’t that actually far scarier?

There are many reasons to loathe Trump and Giuliani, but a heavy hand with the retouching wand, a pale expanse of paunch spilling out of a golf shirt, or a turbo-charged bad hair day are not among them. They are rotten to the core; let’s resist the temptation to fixate on the surface.

 ??  ??
 ?? Photograph: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters ?? Rudy Giuliani’s hair malfunctio­n last week.
Photograph: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters Rudy Giuliani’s hair malfunctio­n last week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States