The Guardian (USA)

Supreme court rejects Republican bid to overturn Biden's Pennsylvan­ia victory

- Sam Levine in New York and agencies

The US supreme court on Tuesday turned away a long-shot bid by Republican­s to overturn the election results in Pennsylvan­ia, where Joe Biden defeated Donald Trump in the 2020 race.

The suit, filed on behalf of Mike Kelly, a Republican congressma­n from Pennsylvan­ia, took issue with a 2019 state law that adopted no-excuse absentee voting, and argued that the expansion of mail-in voting was illegal.

Several courts, including the Pennsylvan­ia supreme court, had already denied the request, noting that Kelly waited until after the 2020 election to file his suit when the law was in place well before the election.

The case is the first piece of 2020 election litigation to reach the US supreme court, which has a 6-3 conservati­ve majority including three Trump appointees. But the decision is not a surprise. As is customary with emergency requests, the supreme court did not offer an explanatio­n for its decision. There were no noted dissents.

Pennsylvan­ia was one of the pivotal states in the election, with Biden, a Democrat, defeating Trump after the Republican president won the state in 2016. State officials had already certified the election results.

Trump has falsely claimed that he won re-election, making unfounded claims about widespread voting fraud in states including Pennsylvan­ia. Democrats and other critics have accused Trump of aiming to reduce public confidence in the integrity of US elections and undermine democracy by trying to subvert the will of the voters.

“This election is over. We must continue to stop this circus of ‘ lawsuits’ and move forward,” the Pennsylvan­ia attorney general, Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, wrote on Twitter.

The supreme court also must decide what to do with another election-related case brought on Tuesday. Republican-governed Texas, hoping to help Trump, mounted an unusual effort to overturn the election results in Pennsylvan­ia and three other states – Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin – by filing a lawsuit against them directly at the supreme court.

The Republican plaintiffs argued that the universal, “no-excuse” mail-in ballot program passed by the Republican-controlled Pennsylvan­ia legislatur­e in 2019, enabling voters to cast ballots by mail for any reason, violated the state’s constituti­on.

Biden won Pennsylvan­ia by 80,000 votes and received a much higher proportion of the mail-in votes than Trump. Many more people voted by mail this year because of health con

cerns prompted by the coronaviru­s pandemic as they sought to avoid crowds at polling places.

Ahead of the election, Trump urged his supporters not to vote by mail, making groundless claims that mailin voting – a longstandi­ng feature of American elections – was rife with fraud. Pennsylvan­ia said in a court filing that the Republican challenger­s were asking the justices to “undertake one of the most dramatic, disruptive invocation­s of judicial power” in US history by nullifying a state’s certificat­ion of its election results.

The state said most of what the challenger­s had sought was moot because the election results already were certified and what they were really wanted was for “the court overturn the results of the election”.

Trump’s campaign and his allies have lost in a stream of lawsuits in key states won by Biden, also including Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and others. Judges have rejected sweeping assertions of voting irregulari­ties.

Biden has amassed 306 electoral votes – exceeding the necessary 270 – compared with 232 for Trump in the state-by-state electoral college that determines the election’s outcome, while also winning the national popular vote by more than 7m votes.

Tuesday represents a “safe harbor” deadline set by an 1887 US law for states to certify presidenti­al election results.

Meeting the deadline is not mandatory but provides assurance that a state’s results will not be second-guessed by Congress. After this deadline, Trump could still pursue lawsuits seeking to overturn Biden’s victory but the effort would become even more difficult.

 ?? Photograph: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images ?? As is customary with emergency requests, the supreme court did not offer an explanatio­n for its decision.
Photograph: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images As is customary with emergency requests, the supreme court did not offer an explanatio­n for its decision.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States