The Guardian (USA)

Are firstborn children really destined for success? Not according to the latest science

- Arwa Mahdawi Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist

What do strippers and scholars have in common? There is some evidence that they are more likely to be firstborn children, like me. The over-representa­tion of firstborns in these profession­s, according to a 1975 research paper, could be down to the fact that “both groups have especially intense needs for recognitio­n, attention, and approval”. Another explanatio­n, of course, could be that the stripper study was based on just 35 people (of which 31 were firstborn) and is thus completely meaningles­s. But I think I prefer the original theory.

It’s not just stripping and scholarshi­p that is supposed to attract eldest kids. A 2017 Swedish study found that firstborn children are more likely to be CEOs and managers while youngest children are more likely to take risks and be self-employed. Another study (which, bizarrely, was commission­ed by Disney as PR for Frozen) found that middle children are 30% more likely to be CEOs than their siblings and 41% more likely to be Olympic athletes.

The idea that your birth order determines your future is beguiling: it means you can blame more of your life choices on your parents. Alas, a new study from the University of Houston has found that the role of birth order on personalit­y and career choice has probably been overestima­ted. The psychologi­st Rodica Damian looked at data tracking 3,763 Americans across 50 years and found that “there is little-to-no evidence here to suggest that first- v later-borns are destined for specific careers.” Her results chime with another largescale study from 2015 that looked at 20,000 adults from the US, UK and Germany and found “no birth-order effects on extraversi­on, emotional stability, agreeablen­ess, conscienti­ousness or imaginatio­n.”

So there you go: for every research paper saying one thing, there’s another paper saying exactly the opposite. I’m no scientist but I am an older child and have a hunch that the studies that show firstborn kids are smarter than their siblings are probably the most trustworth­y of the bunch.

 ?? Photograph: Klaus Vedfelt/Getty Images ?? For the high jump ... firstborn children are more likely to take risks, according to one 2017 study.
Photograph: Klaus Vedfelt/Getty Images For the high jump ... firstborn children are more likely to take risks, according to one 2017 study.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States