The Guardian (USA)

Talk of Rahm Emanuel in Biden cabinet outrages his Chicago critics

- Gloria Oladipo in Chicago

Of all the names bouncing around as prospects yet to be tapped for the incoming Biden-Harris administra­tion, there’s one triggering intense emotion, especially in his home town.

News that Rahm Emanuel is being considered for transporta­tion secretary or another position in Joe Biden’s cabinet or senior team has sparked outrage among Chicagoans who believe his controvers­ial tenure as mayor of that city should disqualify him from a return to the highest echelons of Washington.

Emanuel is a Chicago native with a track record as an Illinois congressma­n before serving as Barack Obama’s chief of staff then two terms as Chicago mayor.

But he’s a divisive figure who long ago upset liberals, most prominentl­y in Washington, by discouragi­ng Obama from pursuing what became his signature legislativ­e achievemen­t – healthcare reform via the Affordable Care Act – and then in myriad ways as mayor of Chicago from 2011 to 2019.

He’s been endorsed by key moderate figures such as the Illinois senator and Democratic whip Dick Durbin, ex-transporta­tion secretary and former Illinois Republican congressma­n Ray LaHood, current congressma­n Mike Quigley and Chicago South Side alderman Michelle Harris, who described him as “the perfect candidate” for the transporta­tion job.

But prominent progressiv­es in Chicago and elsewhere are livid that Biden would even give his name an airing, accusing Emanuel of exacerbati­ng the city’s entrenched, acute inequaliti­es and, most dramatical­ly, botching the handling of Black teenager Laquan McDonald’s killing by a white police officer in 2014.

Rahm Emanuel “covered up the murder of a young Black man in Chicago in order to advance his political career”, city alderman Carlos RamirezRos­a said of his potential appointmen­t.

Dashcam footage of 17-year-old McDonald being gunned down by officer Jason Van Dyke, who was convicted in 2018 of the murder, was suppressed for more than a year before a judge ordered it released. Emanuel’s role in that delay ignited weeks of local and national protests and calls for his resignatio­n. It left an indelible stain and he didn’t run for a third term.

Eva Maria Lewis, a Chicago artist and organizer as well as the founder of the Free Root Operation, a nonprofit fighting poverty-induced gun violence, said that a post for Emanuel in the Biden-Harris administra­tion would mean “people don’t care” what Black Americans have to say.

“You can’t argue against the informatio­n, the evidence is all there – 16 shots and a cover-up, everyone knows what that means. He was essentiall­y ousted. People were not going to go for him being in office after the Laquan McDonald cover-up,” she said.

In the aftermath of the scandal, Emanuel opposed a federal investigat­ion into the Chicago police department and failed to cultivate a community oversight board for the police, as had been promised.

Elsewhere, the New York congresswo­men Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and congressma­n-elect Jamaal Bowman spoke out along similar lines, as did Missouri congresswo­man-elect Cori Bush.

Liberal critics in Chicago are opposed on additional grounds.

Ramirez-Rosa pointed to the infamous closing of 50 Chicago public schools under Emanuel. He added: “He passed policies that balanced the city of Chicago on the backs of working people. I think he’s shown that he is not fit to serve in Biden’s cabinet and really do what needs to be done to undo the harm that was caused by President Trump.”

And he accused Emanuel of focusing on wielding power “on behalf of the interests to billionair­es”, including ultra-wealthy Republican­s.

Emanuel divested from Chicago’s public education after mandating millions in budget cuts as well as 1,400 layoffs, leading to a dire reduction of school nurses, librarians, social workers, and others. In 2012, Chicago teachers went on strike for the first time in almost 25 years.

The school closures, the most at any one time, were concentrat­ed in majority-black, poorer neighborho­ods and disrupted many families’ lives.

“Children had to cross gang territory to get an education. Schools were overcrowde­d. People were forced to attend dilapidate­d schools. The budget was not equitably distribute­d – closing the schools was avoidable,” said Lewis.

Notoriousl­y, Emanuel closed half of Chicago’s public mental health clinics with most of them concentrat­ed on the South Side. The closings resulted in wide disparitie­s in access to mental health treatment, with 0.17 licensed mental health clinicians for every 1,000 South Side residents versus 4.45 for every 1,000 residents on the city’s wealthier North Side. The closing led to a convoluted transition process, with hundreds of unaccounte­d for patients and overburden­ed neighborin­g community mental health providers.

Then there is his style, typical descriptio­ns ranging from tough and effective to abrasive and bullying and, obviously, his reputation on transporta­tion, which is glaringly inconsiste­nt.

“If you didn’t agree on an issue, he was extremely confrontat­ional. I often had one-way confrontat­ions with him where I would ask him questions that should’ve been asked on different issues – such as the ‘Elon Musk tunnel’,” said Scott Waguespack, alderman of Chicago’s 32nd ward.

He added: “Even asking questions about that was met with pushback from him. He didn’t like anyone questionin­g his projects like that. That’s what people have to expect.”

Emanuel touted a project with Tesla’s Musk to built a high-speed undergroun­d transporta­tion system to link downtown to Chicago O’Hare airport, which ultimately failed.

“It was all imagery he put up, that in the long run really had no substance to it,” said Waguespack.

The mayor also created the Chicago Infrastruc­ture Trust, claiming to have secured $1bn worth of private investment and pledging to create 30,000 jobs over three years. The promises didn’t come to fruition and the current mayor, Lori Lightfoot, has since dissolved the trust.

Overall, Emanuel has a mixed legacy on an ambitious transporta­tion vision for Chicago, credited with expanding walking paths and biking lanes in some neighborho­ods, making essential upgrades to Chicago’s public transporta­tion and improvemen­ts at O’Hare – but a drive towards sustainabi­lity and greater equality in services was missing.

The Guardian contacted Emanuel for comment but did not receive a response.

And there is another constituen­cy whose opposition to a great “Return of Rahm” should give Biden pause – trade unions, including in transporta­tion, whose support was a crucial source of votes in Biden’s win last month.

The Transport Workers Union of America (TWU) called the prospect a betrayal and Sara Nelson, president of the Associatio­n of Flight Attendants­CWA, called Emanuel a union buster.

Emanuel had a hostile relationsh­ip with representa­tives of teachers and other city employees.

“We didn’t work our asses off to have Rahm Emanuel as the secretary of transporta­tion … he’s antitrade union, he’s anti-worker,” John Samuelsen, internatio­nal president of TWU, told the Intercept.

Chicago alderman Ramirez-Rosa concluded that any elevation of Emanuel would be a sign that a Biden administra­tion meant “more of the same” political culture in Washington that has eroded public faith.

He said it would signal that “if you have lobbyists, big donors, or billionair­es backing you up, they will be able to put you in that cabinet so you can carry water for them”.

 ??  ?? Rahm Emanuel, who led Chicago as mayor between 2011 and 2019. Prominent progressiv­es in Chicagoand elsewhere are livid that Biden would even give his name an airing. Photograph: Kamil Krzaczyńsk­i/AFP/Getty Images
Rahm Emanuel, who led Chicago as mayor between 2011 and 2019. Prominent progressiv­es in Chicagoand elsewhere are livid that Biden would even give his name an airing. Photograph: Kamil Krzaczyńsk­i/AFP/Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States