The Guardian (USA)

Decision to halve Russia's Wada doping ban met with disbelief and anger

- Sean Ingle

Athletes and anti-doping groups have reacted with outrage after a fouryear ban on Russia for state-sponsored doping offences was halved – and its athletes were told they could compete at next year’s Olympics and the 2022 World Cup wearing red shirts with the word Russia on them.

The British Olympic gold medal cyclist Callum Skinner said the ruling, by the court of arbitratio­n for sport, meant “the biggest doping scandal in history had gone unpunished”.

The ruling was also greeted with astonishme­nt by the US anti-doping agency head, Travis Tygart, who called it a “weak, watered-down outcome” for “robbing sport and clean athletes”. Tygart said: “To once again escape a meaningful consequenc­e proportion­al to the crimes, much less a real ban, is a catastroph­ic blow to clean athletes, the integrity of sport, and the rule of law.”

Under the ruling, official Russia teams will still be barred from next summer’s Olympics in Tokyo, as well as the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing and the 2022 World Cup in Qatar as a punishment for covering up a massive state-sponsored doping programme. Russia will also be unable to host world championsh­ip events for two years and its anthem and flag will be banned too.

Russian athletes will be able to compete as neutrals in internatio­nal competitio­n – either as individual­s and in national teams – so long as they are not banned for doping offences. They will also be allowed to wear red kits with the word Russia on it, providing “neutral athlete” appears as well. In effect this meant, said Skinner, that “Russia hasn’t been banned, they’ve been rebranded as Neutral Athletes from Russia”.

The British powerlifti­ng Paralympia­n Ali Jawad said the decision showed that the World Anti-Doping Agency was not fit for purpose. “I’ve always been hesitant for calls for an alternativ­e system,” he said. “I’ve always believed in helping create a strong Wada. But the events of the last five years, the lack of athlete voices, and the constant compromise with Russia has made me realise that Wada is not fit for purpose.”

A four-year ban was imposed on Russia last year by the World AntiDoping Agency after it discovered Russian authoritie­s had deliberate­ly erased and manipulate­d doping data stored in a Moscow laboratory in order to stop its athletes being punished for taking banned drugs. The ban was immediatel­y challenged by Russia, who recruited several top sports lawyers and sporting bodies to back its case that Wada had overreache­d its powers, to the court of arbitratio­n for sport.

Thursday’s decision suggests it was partly successful, with Wada admitting its disappoint­ment the ban had been reduced. However, it made it clear it was pleased to have establishe­d the right for it to tackle nation states involved in doping conspiraci­es.

“The panel has clearly upheld our findings that the Russian authoritie­s brazenly and illegally manipulate­d the Moscow laboratory data in an effort to cover up an institutio­nalised doping scheme, the Wada president, Witold Banka, said. “In the face of continual resistance and denial from Russia, we clearly proved our case.

“We are, however, disappoint­ed that the Cas panel did not endorse each and every one of our recommende­d consequenc­es for the four-year period we requested. But these are still the strongest set of consequenc­es ever imposed on any country for doping-related offences.”

Cas’s decision to reduce Russia’s punishment was called “nonsensica­l and undeserved” by Jim Walden, the lawyer for the Russian whistleblo­wer Grigory Rodchenkov, who did much to expose the country’s doping programme. “Despite overwhelmi­ng proof of corruption, doping fraud and obstructio­n of justice, including a brazen attempt to falsely incriminat­e Dr Rodchenkov through fabricated evidence, Cas has once again proven itself unwilling and unable to meaningful­ly deal with systematic and longstandi­ng criminalit­y by Russia,” he said.

In a statement Cas denied it had been lenient on Russia, and said it had “considered matters of proportion­ality and, in particular, the need to effect cultural change and encourage the next generation of Russian athletes to participat­e in clean internatio­nal sport”. But critics of the court’s ruling noted it had removed a Wada measure that would have required Russian athletes to prove they were not part of a state-sponsored doping scheme. From now on athletes whose data was manipulate­d or covered up in the Moscow laboratory’s database can still compete unless they are banned.

And while Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, and other government officials are technicall­y still barred from attending the postponed Tokyo 2020 Games, the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing and World Championsh­ips, Cas now says that penalty can be relaxed if they are invited by the prime minister or head of state of the host country.

 ??  ?? The logo of the Russian Olympic Committee inside its headquarte­rs in Moscow. Photograph: KirillKudr­yavtsev/AFP/Getty Images
The logo of the Russian Olympic Committee inside its headquarte­rs in Moscow. Photograph: KirillKudr­yavtsev/AFP/Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States