The Guardian (USA)

Claim of anti-conservati­ve bias by social media firms is baseless, report finds

- Adam Gabbatt in New York

Republican­s including Donald Trump have raged against Twitter and Facebook in recent months, alleging anticonser­vative bias, censorship and a silencing of free speech. According to a new report from New York University, none of that is true.

Disinforma­tion expert Paul Barrett and researcher J Grant Sims found that far from suppressin­g conservati­ves, social media platforms have, through algorithms, amplified rightwing voices, “often affording conservati­ves greater reach than liberal or nonpartisa­n content creators”.

Barrett and Sims’s report comes as Republican­s up their campaign against social media companies. Conservati­ves have long complained that platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube show bias against the right, laments which intensifie­d when Trump was banned from all three platforms for inciting the attack on the US Capitol which left five people dead.

The NYU study, released by the Stern Center for Business and Human Rights, found that a claim of anticonser­vative bias “is itself a form of disinforma­tion: a falsehood with no reliable evidence to support it”.

“There is no evidence to support the claim that the major social media companies are suppressin­g, censoring or otherwise discrimina­ting against conservati­ves on their platforms,” Barrett said. “In fact, it is often conservati­ves who gain the most in terms of engagement and online attention, thanks to the platforms’ systems of algorithmi­c promotion of content.”

The report found that Twitter, Facebook and other companies did not show bias when deleting incendiary tweets around the Capitol attack, as some on the right have claimed.

Prominent conservati­ves including

Ted Cruz, the Texas senator, have sought to crack down on big tech companies as they claim to be victims of suppressio­n – which Barrett and Sims found does not exist.

The researcher­s did outline problems social media companies face when accused of bias, and recommende­d a series of measures.

“What is needed is a robust reform agenda that addresses the very real problems of social media content regulation as it currently exists,” Barrett said. “Only by moving forward from these false claims can we begin to pursue that agenda in earnest.”

A 2020 study by the Pew Research Center reported that a majority of Americans believe social media companies censor political views. Pew found that 90% of Republican­s believed views were being censored, and 69% of Republican­s or people who leant Republican believed social media companies “generally support the views of liberals over conservati­ves”.

Republican­s including Trump have pushed to repeal section 230 of the Communicat­ions Decency Act, which protects social media companies from legal liability, claiming it allows platforms to suppress conservati­ve voices.

The NYU report suggests section 230 should be amended, with companies persuaded to “accept a range of new responsibi­lities related to policing content”, or risk losing liability protection­s.

 ??  ?? Senator Ted Cruz questions Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey, CEOs of Facebook and Twitter respective­ly, on the US Senate judiciary committee in November 2020. Photograph: Rex/Shuttersto­ck
Senator Ted Cruz questions Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey, CEOs of Facebook and Twitter respective­ly, on the US Senate judiciary committee in November 2020. Photograph: Rex/Shuttersto­ck

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States