The Guardian (USA)

Trump's assault on the environmen­t is over. Now we must reverse the damage

- Jonathan B Jarvis and Gary Machlis

Now that the Trump administra­tion’s fouryear assault on environmen­tal protection and conservati­on has crested, the work of restoratio­n must begin. As profession­als in the field of conservati­on, we watched with dread and dismay as the laws, policies, science and stewardshi­p of waters, air, wildlife and public lands were systematic­ally dismantled.

While the damage is profound, the Biden-Harris administra­tion can reverse these harms, restart fundamenta­l environmen­tal policies and programs, and restore the federal commitment to environmen­tal protection and lands and waters stewardshi­p. What is needed is a tactical plan for restoratio­n.

Ten months before the November 2020 election, we convened a team of diverse environmen­tal leaders with government, nonprofit, private sector, and academic experience. They were from both coasts and the heartland, the north-west and the south-east, rural America and large cities. Meeting virtually as The Restoratio­n Project, they worked over several months to create a carefully researched and prioritize­d list of the top 100 important actions to be taken to restore the nation’s environmen­t. The plan was delivered to the Biden-Harris transition team in November, and we are releasing it today to the public here.

Some of the plan’s top priorities have already been met, including rejoining the Paris Climate agreement (#1), issuing executive orders on meeting climate change goals (#2), and halting the Keystone XL pipeline (#25). Other restorativ­e actions will take longer, especially where the Trump administra­tion locked in changes with new federal regulation­s.

For instance, final regulation­s were issued by the Environmen­tal Protection Agency that weakened fuel economy standards for cars and trucks from 54mpg to 40mpg by 2025, which may exacerbate the climate crisis. The EPA also finalized the so-called “transparen­cy rule” that would restrict the agency from considerin­g scientific studies that do not reveal raw data, including confidenti­al or personal identifyin­g informatio­n. The result is that studies including such personal informatio­n can no longer be used to evaluate toxic substances that endanger public safety. The team prioritize­d these reversals among its top 10, and recommende­d either they be repealed by Congress or a new rule be promulgate­d, a process that will take several years.

Some of the “harms” are already being challenged in the courts, such as drastic reductions of both Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears national monuments. In other cases, the courts have ruled the Trump action as illegal, as in the replacemen­t of the Clean Power Plan with one that did not protect air quality. The Biden-Harris administra­tion can restore the boundaries of the two national monuments and issue a new, stronger plan for clean air.

The Trump administra­tion rolled back a series of protection­s for the nation’s wildlife, mostly through policy directives within the interior department. The plan calls for the new interior secretary to restore protection­s for migratory birds that could be killed by industrial developmen­t, eliminate the practice of shooting female grizzly bears in their dens in Alaska, and prevent the shooting of polar bears by private companies exploring for oil in the Arctic national wildlife refuge.

The plan also calls for a restoratio­n of protection for special places that we all thought were legally protected from developmen­t and impact, including road building and logging in the Tongass national forest of Alaska, drilling in the Arctic national wildlife refuge, and oil and gas developmen­t adjacent to Chaco Culture national historical park.

The detailed approaches required for restoratio­n and outlined in the report – executive orders, policy changes, and prudent use of the Congressio­nal Review Act– may seem mundane, but this is what we must do to restore what has been lost, threatened and harmed. Some of the actions will be easily completed in the first 100 days of the administra­tion and others will take years to reverse, requiring patience and persistenc­e. We recommend that the administra­tion track and report to the American people progress on the accomplish­ments detailed in the plan.

The Restoratio­n Project was written for the government as a tactical plan for progress. But it is also a call to action for a broader conservati­on movement that includes those working to restore civil rights, rural economies, public health, scientific integrity and environmen­tal justice. The new administra­tion should be supported in its progress, applauded for its successes – and held accountabl­e when action is forestalle­d or lacking.

Jonathan BJarvis served 40 years with the National Park Service and was its 18th director. DrGary Machlis served as science adviser to the director of the National Park Service and is a professor of environmen­tal sustainabi­lity at Clemson University. They are the co-authors of The Future of Conservati­on in America: A Chart for Rough Water (University of Chicago Press).

The opinions expressed here are those of the authors. For more informatio­n about how this project is supported, click here.

 ?? Photograph: Alamy Stock Photo ?? Hoodoo ‘garden’ in the Grand Staircase-Escalante national monument.
Photograph: Alamy Stock Photo Hoodoo ‘garden’ in the Grand Staircase-Escalante national monument.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States